So I wrote a review of a massage therapist that advertises both on backrubs and therapeutic on Backpage.  She has been reviewed here in the past.  One review of her says she was highly erotic and is a part time escort.   The others (later ones) say she is no "treasure" and you are better off with a vacation in the sierras.

So I write a review saying nothing of interest happened and did not find a good value for money.  The review is rejected as she claims in her ads to offer nothing erotic.  So no reason to run the review (which I thought might be a public service).   Fine, I get it.

Then I see a review recently for Jessica/Steph.  Also nothing happening there. She does not  advertise in backrubs as far as I know.  And certainly does not hint of more action in the ad.  The recent reviewers found nothing doing as far as TER interest.   So why does this review get posted?    

By the way, I had a similar experience with Jessica/Steph as most reviewers.  She wanted to postpone my appointment that was made earlier so she could finish a DVD she was watching.  WTF?  Of course her time is certainly more valuable than mine, so what was my little head thinking?   I had seen her once before years ago and can't say that experience was any different, except she did not play games with the timing of the appointment on the first visit.

Can somebody explain how our hosts decide what to publish?  I sure do not get it.