Is that one of the reviewers of the first link mentions he wasn't sure about seeing her based on the mixed reviews .LMFAO

And, she is in Salt Lake City- maybe that explains something about multiple reviews that could have been "ditto" after the first one.  Maybe not much talent for the jack mormons to visit.

before people stop seeing them? Just wondering.

like, "how many roads must man go down?"  Personally, I'd rather fly.

I find amusing when reviews talk about "I was there so I'll just go ahead with it" or " "my little head was doing the thinking" etc, etc. And some if the reviews are from vets if the hobby and obviously can do research. I don't get it.

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=183035
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=184363
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=170261

That's a record in my book.

I have always believed that if you are savvy enough to post a review, you are savvy enough to check for reviews beforehand. This always baffles me when I see them.

I took the pic from a BP ad for a gal named Summer I believe. When I realized I should have include her review link I looked for her on Tin Eye and got no hits. I would think it would have shown up. So Tin Eye isn't too reliable either?

They can't cover the whole internet; it's too vast.  But it helps and I use it along with Google Images; often one will find something the other different.