Minnesota

oh,confused_smile
tiltedhalo 2 Reviews 287 reads
posted

A reply is never required. It may be assumed by you, but it is never a requirement.

Mr.M.Johnson1908 reads

It's been low for a long time

Who agrees

Recruiting ringers, or kicking out the unfit?

How about gene therapy?

Posted By: darmody
Recruiting ringers, or kicking out the unfit?  
   
 How about gene therapy?

loveyourtouch424 reads

the pattern that for some the answer ALWAYS resorts to them removing and/or censoring others.  All about control.  And to suggest gene therapy and suggest others are the problem??? Wow!  Scary shit people think and post.  So who is really the problem?   And such comments are A-OK with TER?

loveyourtouch306 reads

Yes.  Of course I am familiar with sarcasm.  There is always truth of the speaker's intention in it.  I also know there are some things that aren't so funny.... whether sarcastic or not.  I don't see the humor in this.  Would it be OK for some (such as me) to suggest others others require gene modification?  Somehow I think not.  

(And to the person in the community counting my posts:  This is why my number is higher than others.  I respond to people when an reply is required.)

A reply is never required. It may be assumed by you, but it is never a requirement.

loveyourtouch208 reads

...so why not follow your own advice?  Hmmmm???   (That was rhetorical. I know the answer.)  You added absolutely nothing (zilch, zero, nada) to this thread.  And don't pretend to know what I assume.  You don't have a clue.

But in some cases a reply is appropriate.

loveyourtouch332 reads

Your point was clarified.  Thank you.  And I apologize for jumping the gun.  I agree with your take on the OP.

loveyourtouch282 reads

Thank you.

Though many in here won't believe it, I really am a laid back and humble guy.  I call 'em as I see 'em.  And when I am wrong, I 'll be the first to say so.  Nice of you to comment.  Thanks.

debauchedB523 reads

are so vicious b/c the stakes are so low -- and I often feel the need to substitute 'childish' for 'vicious'.  

But when I do bother to give thought to the disputes, the root problem doesn't seem to be IQ but people who believe that something they call "WK-ism" is rampant, intolerable and those "guilty" of it need saving.  

But the anti-WK crowd seems immune to the idea that for most of us, insofar as 'WK-ism' means something bad/"stoopid"/pernicious, etc., few, if any, are guilty of embracing it and insofar as it means something that most of us embrace, it's part and parcel of being a happy, well-adjusted, decent human being.  My 2 cents.

-- Modified on 12/5/2016 8:59:40 AM

It seems that the issues are not about WKs at all. They appear to be just a small insignificant tangent of the problems behind the scenes.

Be careful when following the masses...  sometimes the M is silent.

Please clarify your point. Pretty ambiguous  

Posted By: Its_My_Money
Be careful when following the masses...  sometimes the M is silent.

The gap between IQ and life expectancy in America is narrowing and perhaps one day will pass each other going in opposite directions.

The hilarious "Idiocracy" and "Dumb and Dumber".

Posted By: Mr.M.Johnson
It's been low for a long time  
   
 Who agrees?  
   
 

Register Now!