She isn't able to be disscussed here anymore since her request to be de-listed!
I'm already allowing one "unauthorized" thread for her on this page, put your additional comments about her under that thread!

I've still got to pay for it just like you!
 I check my PM everyday, hoping the ladies will be so impressed with my awsome power and majestic presence that they will throw themselves at me in a bare-back orgy delight,,, but it's been almost a year that I've been doing this and no offers...
 Mostly I just clean up the little messes, like when some jittery drunk fumbles around and double posts...

We are starting to get a LITTLE too much censoring on this board which kind of surprises me a bit since I thought Ben was more tolerant that some others.  Lots of providers have been delisted but its never gone as far as being censured off the boards.  And how the hell can you tell if we are talking about the same Mandy.  God forbid if some new Mandy pops up and we all miss out because of this bs.  Its not that I want to post shit about girls that want to be strictly UTR, but its the principle of this that bugs me.  Just my .02

I think it's the first thing I've censored in months!
 This is a TER rule, that once a provider requests to be de-listed, that they are no longer able to be discussed... Thus your claim that " Lots of providers have been delisted but its never gone as far as being censured off the boards" is COMPLETELY FALSE! This has been the policy since the beginning of TER and is enforced HEAVILY on all boards! I am BY FAR the most lax moderator about this!
The one thread that I am allowing about her is more than any other board would allow!
As far as any other Mandys or UTR girls you wish to discuss, they are all fair game, unless they also contact TER and request to be de-listed... And how will I know if it's the same Mandy or not? I'll check the link and read the context of the message body... just like how ANYONE ELSE would figure out who was being discussed!
(But I think you have a good point in that I will need to be more specific as to which provider is not allowed to be discussed)

 BTW, my rule-post was in response to a new Mandy thread which had been started, that I removed... There is a current thread about her on this page, and if the posts had been made under that existing thread, I would have left them and not needed to post this warning...