As has been debated here and other boards a zillion times, both the terms GFE and PSE are pretty overworked, and the debate will probably never end.  (Another I've found is "BBBJTC" which used to imply CIM by it's definition, and now has come to mean "almost to completion," but I digress.)

I've always taken GFE to mean that the provider was emotionally engaged...  was actively involved, or as one person once said well, is "fully present" in our meeting.  For others, it usually means specific activities...  So I tend to avoid the term as much as possible.

And to me, PSE has always implied a very blunt, direct focus on the whoopie, while for others, it means a meeting with a true porn star.

(And to me, GFE and PSE are by no means mutually exclusive, while others use them to mean the opposite of each other.)

But I certainly agree with your central premise, that we seem to overlook the "nice roll in the sack" session that doesn't really have any GFE or PSE frills to it...  A provider with high marks for appearance and "technical merit" but does not seek high scores in "artistic impression."

Here's the trick... to come up with a term that does not have any negative conotation to it, so that a provider (or agency) wouldn't feel bad about advertising it.  (Thalia/MC being a prfect example.)  If it's a positive term, MC could have said, "no, she's more of an RSE, but gets very high marks for that" and somebody like Brittney could set the expectation right up front by saying it on her web site.

Maybe:
RISE for "Roll In the Sack Experience"
RSE for "Roll in the Sack Experience"
NFE for "No Frills Experience"  (may have a negative spin though)
???

As one who has seen Brittney I agree its not a GFE experience, but considering the lower rate, I would not wish to put any negative vibes out about her. In my opinion, she's worth every penny considering what other non-GFE's and GFE pretenters charge.  Can't recall whether her ad claims GFE or not, but if it does you've got a point.  As for the term, I think it needs more explicit definition on this board.  With the exception of uncovered sex and bj, I think its got to mean basically what you would expect from a provider if she were ACTUALLY your girlfriend.  I think most of us would expect that to mean DFK, and the proper attitude to go with it. I don't think it necessary means some ideal of an anything goes provider.  Some of us just want the clinical/technical performance. In my case, because my significant other won't bbbj or cim or anal.  I don't need a girlfriend.  But for those who do, I think GFE should mean what it says.   But thats just my opinion