There is a new review for Lydia. I like her look, I am interested. I am not VIP so there is only so far I can get to research this one.
Reviewer says photos are real and accurate. No TinEye hits. Any comments on this one? Does our reviewer have a history? Thanks everybody... and the review in question seems very positive IMO... in fact, I'd say the performance rating is conservative based on the full text of the review.
Related link: http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?ID=22718
http://tinyurl.com/cg472eo
Never got a response...probably a BS review...
35 reviews over nearly 5 years, but one review is labeled "BS" because he didn't reply to an email.
A lot of TER members don't post in the discussions. It doesn't mean they fabricate reviews. And there's many reasons for not replying to an email.
The 35 reviews and he doesn't post here I will
agree with you on. As for an email, there is a
little message that's pops up on top (left) saying you have mail and also, if you just wrote a review,
they give you 15 days of VIP so he does have
PM capabilities.
In any case, if he uses TER and has 35 reviews going back 7+ years, I assume he does a little
homework which does not explain why someone would
TOFTT with ...
http://tinyurl.com/cg472eo
...someone using the names Shayla, Jessica, Staci, MsBecca, Rosa,
and at least 4 different phone numbers....
Will let you do a follow up mission for us
and let you report back...
-- Modified on 4/21/2013 3:14:05 PM
Just a few things to keep in mind:
1) Not everyone goes on TER every day. There's times when I go several days w/o logging on myself. So if you haven't waited a few days for a response, I think it's too soon to complain about no response to your PM.
2) A PM is not an email. Thanks for clarifying you sent a TER PM, not an email.
3) The review says the pics are "real". It didn't say "accurate". The reviewer himself questioned whether they were accurate, at the start of the review. Based on the review, they seem close enough so he was pleased with what he found behind the door.
4) It's just under 5 years, not 7+ years of reviews. Still a LOT of reviews (35), over a long period of time, with lots of variation in scores, including some low scores, and considerable detail in many reviews, all of which doesn't seem to fit the profile of someone who would fabricate reviews.
5) The reviewer seems to have taken a hiatus from the hobby, or at least from reviews, for nearly 3 years. Then four reviews in the past 2 months. Two were a first review, one was a 2nd review, one was a 3rd review. So maybe this is someone who likes to or at least doesn't mind seeing less-established providers.
Bottom line: Could be a case of an ad having re-used pics (which as you know happens all the time with legit providers), but close enough to the looks of the provider that it was not a big deal for the reviewer. IMO there is not enough evidence to declare a "BS" on this review. I tend to give someone with a review record like this the benefit of the doubt.
I have seen where the first review says there real pics then reviewer 2, 3, 4, etc... says it not the
girl in the ad. I could start looking for those reviews but if you read the new reviews quite often you'll see that.
"...Call setup a time to meet at her apartment...."
But then...
"... I will repeat when she is in my part of town again..."
------------------------
Still thinks its BS???
I think this would be much easier to move across town...
http://framework.latimes.com/2012/10/15/time-lapse-video-space-shuttle-endeavours-trek-across-l-a/
... that was you I believe?
Note the multiple cities. That could explain it. Or could be someone who isn't as clear as he could be in the written word. I've seen a LOT of that in reviews... and in Discussion posts!
Doesn't mean the reviews are bogus.
You do what you think you need to do. I need a little more evidence before disparaging someone's integrity.
http://theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=227279
http://tinyurl.com/cwbr5j5
Why not call her, get directly to the bottom (no pun intended) of this?
BTW... providers have been known to relocate. I can't see any evidence that these photos couldn't point to the same woman. You, with your superior powers of deduction and observation, might see otherwise. ![]()
guy to move her apartment building next time ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXdViWVgHq4
Disappointing. but much better than being disappointed at her door.
Back to my original plan before this distraction.
Why give the OP all this free advice? You are such suckers, in the name of helping a brother out.
Let him buy or fuck his way to VIP status.
Then he can do his own research-
I don't get why would you pay for VIP and then give it away to this lazy, cheap asshat?
Reviewer says photos are real and accurate. No TinEye hits.
Any comments on this one? Does our reviewer have a history?
Thanks everybody.
...to many of us. I have benefited from his reviews. With that in mind, I'm happy to tell him that Lydia's reviewer looks credible, gives her the same score as the OP gave the fifth person on his review list, and looks like he grades harder than does the OP. The review was of a quicky, with lots of data absent, but was enough to reinforce my inclination to think about seeing her.