I read a recent review of a lady I was thinking of seeing and then looked at all of her reviews. She has scores for appearance from a high of 10 (once in a lifetime) hard to imagine - to 6. Are we supposed to split the difference? It would be nice if guys were realistic and not looking with the one eye.

Completely agree. A few problems with different scores.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Too many guys have very narrow tastes in appearance.  (Did you know there are websites devoted to oddly beautiful women?)
Some guys punish women with scores if they will not discount.
Read the review.  Is this the kind of interaction that you want?
And then, take a chance.  She has reviews, so she is authentic.
Life is boring if you eat or dress the same way all the time.

In general..I take the number give and reduce by 1...as it is usally too high.....and nothing agasint the gals being rated...but 8-9-10 seem to be given way too much.....

You are not going to find a supermodel providing!!!!!  

I understand that beauty is in the eye of the beholder but I have seen her pics on her site and she is a 7 - 8 tops. I think we can all agree that a 10 would be someone like Monica Bellucci and we are not going to find those here very often so why score them that way? Lets be a bit realistic shall we? Please?

Does the rating score for appearance really matter if the providers has pictures? Whether her pictures are real and accurate means more to me than the score, which is very subjective.
Putting a person's appearance on a number scale seems rather demeaning to me.

different people like different things and are attracted to different looks but it is so much more than that.  psychologist will explain that 60% of the decision about the food in a restaurant is made before you taste the food.  when you meet some one who could be a 6 or a 9 at the extremes, it will depend on other things.  was the first contact friendly, did you like the sound of her voice, the atmosphere when you arrived is just the start.  It is not misleading or did honest.  From experience most of us can recall a meeting with a lady who started out less than attractive and in the 15 minuets before we walked out she became truly ugly.  More often it goes the other way, a lady who could be a 5 or 6 objectively takes an a glow in the heat of the moment,  Take a good look at your old wedding photos and compare it to the lady you went through divorce with.  Kind people get better looking mean people are ugly.

You take the aggregate of the Appearance scores then add the aggregate of the Performance scores minus total number of reviews divided by two. Divide total by number of reviews then divide by two. Then make an appearance rating based on her pictures multiplied by number of reviews. Subtract number of reviews divided by 4 or 2 if pictures where clearly edited, then divided by number of reviews. Then divide by two. Add the two scores then divide by two. MAYBE?

You spend a lot of time thinking about this? Or typing it?
I know I spent way too long looking at it lol.

My formula:  Smile + Look me in the eyes + knowing touch = Perfect

Because I grew up on the beaches in southern California and saw girls like this everywhere every day, I can not give her a higher score. However I do reserve the right to raise her score after seeing her face!

Like it...your way is even simpler!

But, has anyone ever accused you of thinking too much

I have no idea who you are talking about nor do I care to look. However, what I consider to be gorgeous and stunning will be completely different from others. If I rate a woman a 10 in looks, it is because "I" think she is a 10. I do not expect anyone to agree with my rating nor do I agree with others. For me, the ladies rating also figures in personality. So a lady that only gets a 9 in looks but a "my" type of gal personality would have a higher score.
As far as the other score, that just irritates me. Too many clients just guess on what is offered. Because remember that score is based on what is offered not what the 2 of you enjoyed.

Eye appeal x pant tenting (mine not hers) volume x boobie (hers not mine) volume = SCORE

Any woman looks good with her chin on your balls. I have witnessed amazing transformations myself. Additionally, their eyes have gotten much more seductive from that point of view. I will continue to experiment and report back on this spooky phenomenon.

What if she doesnt have a chin?  This one in the link gets a score of 7 from TER reviewers.  Wonder what a 4 would look like?  Aliciah Hartoley got  a 7 too.  Her pictures look like they were taken by a coroner.

"Madam, at night all cats are grey."

I am not sure what is worse the fact that Dr TR came up with this formula or that I am correcting it. I notice the "4 or 2" in the formula and thought it was really odd and then I notice that (1037 - (125/2)/125 does not equal 974.5 it is 7.8 so I decided to go through the example and got  

Genius!

I get the biggest kick out of the 6-6 scores that detail what a great looking lady she is and what a great time he had!  And then "I've already repeated!"

This is what I do
1) Look at the actual pics - if accurate you can make up your own mind from that
2) Read the review details - will hopefully tell you if the pics are reasonably accurate or not and reveal other details the pics may not
3) Check out other reviews by the reviewers - helps give you a better idea of how a given reviewer looks at the ladies, particularly if you find someone you have also seen

Further, I think you would do well to incorporate some kind of outlier-elimination logic once a provider has a statistically significant N of, say, 15 reviews.  You could use either a Gaussian or power-law (Pareto) approach to normalizing distribution.

And I've wondered the same thing.  Funny you should suggest splitting the difference, because I'd honestly rate myself (looks alone) as an 8

You are too modest.....you're beautiful baby!!