...just thought I'd point this out for those who are as slow as me to catch on. I'm not exactly...

http://youtu.be/zOvyRjVQLjE

...... or could be the reviewer saw photos someplace else.  Or maybe he just needs to take more time on those drop-downs.

Phone number thing..... agency girls.  So not surprising phone number is the same for several girls.

Not surprised either that TER didn't catch this...... they let much more obvious problems in reviews & profiles pass by every day.

But now the world is safer for hobbying, so we can all sleep easy tonight!  

and the link to the cached ad.  http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:qk7lyEG_LXcJ:minneapolis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/xx-young-horny-asian-gf-waiting-for-you-tonight-jenne-xx-24/11239598+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a

The problem is with TER which defaults to the most recent ad.  That in turn means that "photos real, yes or no" is irrelevant because the photos change all the time.  It's been a persistent annoying deficiency for quite some time.

The solution is to copy the link, then google the link and open the cached page.

Sorry if that's not clear. But you probably get my drift...