I am not certain that a last name is necessary. If a market is saturated with a certain name -- and a provider decides to use a common name, then I feel that it is a marketing mistake by the provider.

The trend in many forms of entertainment is to forge a distinct identity with a single name. In music, for example, we have Prince, Madonna and Beyonce. In basketball, for example, we have Kobe, Shaq and LeBron. The force of their personalities, along with their accomplishments, require only a single name to establish who we are discussing in a conversation.

An accomplishment for a provider would be to develop a nickname for their stage name. For example, Kobe is well-known as the "Black Mamba", and LeBron is well-known as "King James".

In all respects, it would take some effort for a provider to earn a nickname. It would probably have to reference a sex act (i.e., Linda Lovelace as "Deep Throat") or a certain indelible energy that a provider exhibits in a session.

I wanted something that fit me a little more and I believe when you use too exotic of a name it starts to sound trashy. Brittney Bottoms works for me and is just perfect. If I had to go without the Bottom than my name would not have much pi-jazz to it. Brittney Bottoms is the girl you always had a secret crush on in high school, she turned porn star and you defiantly still want to fuck the brains out of this girl next store kinda name.

It would certainly save me time when I do searches. Convincing the girls is a different story.