Seems like so many reviews I read it says "not actually her photo but fair represention" or "photo close to her but not really her" but then the photo accurate field is checked as YES.

I understand the reason for not using real photos (so no need to re-visit) but shouldn't the photo accurate field be checked as NO??  Maybe TER needs another field called "not real photo but accurate representation".

Not trying to call out this reviewer but I attached an example.

If the picture is a reasonable approximation, I would be more likely to select YES and explain in the details than select NO simply because in this case YES is closer to the truth of what you will see than NO.  Also, the values in a provider's profile are set by the first reviewer and do not get updated unless someone submits a problem report with updated info; even then TER may reject it if the supporting documentation is lacking.

I don't get it.

-- Modified on 11/12/2012 5:41:14 AM

If the picture is NOT HER, than the it should be "NO" the picture is not accurate.  
Anything else would be wrong.  

It does not reflect on her appearance or skills, just that the pictures should be disregarded.  
I think pictures are important and tell me quite a bit about a provider, but fake pictures don't tell me anything.

That's my point...TER should reject the review because the photo is not accurate or change the photo accurate check box to say NO.

People obviously have different opinions on this but for me I see a big difference between a fake pic that is similar to who I will see if I make an appointment versus one that is a blatant misrepresentation.  Right now, the only way to make that distinction is in the comments sections.  I don't care for the practice but I won't rule someone out if the pics are close.