Minnesota

I think it's clear it's a typo...
knotsaway 38 Reviews 104 reads
posted

... and should have been "off".  It wouldn't make sense otherwise.

But it demonstrates that some typos in reviews are more important than others!

I saw a review recently of a highly-rated local provider in which no cover was mentioned.  But there was no direct mention of BBFS either. Which leads me to believe it was just sloppy writing.  

GroinGravy1771 reads

"...and took off the protection..." verse "...and took out the protection.." in this review ...

      http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/detail/audrey-moore-review-by-rahuls3109-2071869

There always seems to be a bit of controversy with these.

... and should have been "off".  It wouldn't make sense otherwise.

But it demonstrates that some typos in reviews are more important than others!

I saw a review recently of a highly-rated local provider in which no cover was mentioned.  But there was no direct mention of BBFS either. Which leads me to believe it was just sloppy writing.  

Register Now!