Minnesota

I saw her
boodega 2 Reviews 1541 reads
posted
1 / 8
makehersquirtalot 840 reads
posted
3 / 8

I saw her many months ago.  Her pics are touched up a bit, but she is a pretty gal.  The session what very business like with no sensuality and no hint of anything more.  The massage was only mediocre, so I won't even consider going back.  She seemed in a hurry.  YMMV, but that was my experience.  I couldn't post review because of her ad and services offered.

Drumsticks 90 Reviews 612 reads
posted
4 / 8

I don't understand the rules for posting a review of a massage gal when no sex occurred. A score of 7 for performance is supposed to assume that physical sex occurred, not just in the mind of the hapless massagee.

ogglesby11 41 Reviews 1056 reads
posted
5 / 8

Nice gal. Quite beautiful. Gained a few pounds below the waist since these pics. Therapeutic only to the best of my knowledge.

vectorvictor 830 reads
posted
6 / 8

Therapeutic was my experience.  I was under the impression that therapeutic listings were to be not reviewed.

makehersquirtalot 575 reads
posted
7 / 8

I did see her several months ago.  Sounded very nice on the phone and threw some subtle hints. Session was 100% therapeutic. She remained fully clothed and strategically moved and/or positioned herself to her advantage.  Rushed/cut-short session.  A very mediocre massage by therapeutic measures.  I wouldn't go back for a 1/2 price sale.  But that's just my 2 cents.  The massage room is in the back of beauty/hair salon.

Derpdydoo 78 Reviews 554 reads
posted
8 / 8

Posted By: vectorvictor
Therapeutic was my experience.  I was under the impression that therapeutic listings were to be not reviewed.
There is a section of reviews for brick and mortar girls.. AMP's for the most part.  But, as much as some guys have some imaginary line they've drawn about "therapuetic" there isn't one.

I get more real fun at the "therapeutic" then these body rub ads that are so full of high priced DIY BS.

Register Now!