I noticed a few recent reviews that make no mention of whether or not they covered up during a session.  If I don't see it mentioned in a review my thought is that a condom wasn't used.  So are some reviewers just being lazy about mentioning protection because it sounds better?

Whether or not a review specifically mentions putting on a condom strikes me as a poor way to decide if BBFS happened.  You can always PM the reviewer if you like.

I personally don't mention it because i figure it's assumed a cover was used, except when it comes to oral, than i specify. Funny, it never even occoured to me...

I can recall when your reviews would not get approved if it wasnt clear about being covered for fs.  Considering the change in policy, reviews are getting approved regardless now.

I'm not sure whether it's on the rise but, in my experience, it is available from "quality providers" so long as you are capable of differentiating yourself from other guys and being viewed as someone "special." Not an easy thing to do given that there are a lot of appealing guys out there. Another option is to run an ad on a "Sugar Daddy"-type service. A number of quality young women view the thought of earning an extra $XXXX a month appealing. Might be less risky healthwise, too. In either case, you're talking about a substantial amount of time and money and, maybe, committing to see them exclusively. By "quality" women I'm excluding the trailer park trash types who might offer it to a lot of guys.

That's why I asked before removing a provider from my short list.  Thanks for the insight guys.  Seems like different reviewers have different styles of writing.

It's curious to have a topic where every person who offers an opinion eithers says or implies that they, personally, don't practice this activity.  I don't know about it, personally, but...

I do know about BBFS, personally, and practice it on a regular basis.  I get tested twice a year and I have never had an issue with disease of any sort.  I also know that it is not necessary to pay a premium fee to get it.

How can it be so fascinating to comment on a practice you don't practice and don't intend to ever praciice?

so I know who NOT to see. Ultimately, it's your life and the providers. But I have no desire to see anyone who offers BBFS, and I would appreciate it if TER would make it very clear which providers and hobbyists are in to BBFS. It's simply irresponsible and unprofessional, in my opinion.

Relax.  If you really want to remain safe, you should not have sexual contact of any kind, whether covered or uncovered.  No matter how many people enjoy BBFS or which providers have it available, you will never be required to do it.

It is very much on the rise!!! Out of the last 4 providers I've seen they all offered it and for no extra charge. If you ask you would be surprised at  how many yes answers you will get. Even from some of the ladies I've seen post here has no ways. It happens don't be nieve. If you want to be safe it's up to you to do so.

Just because I will risk hobbling, does not mean I want to risk being with a woman who barebacks and admits to it in public.

Don't let them fool you.I have BBF more  $300 and $400 providers from MN then I can count on one hand.I won't put it in a review and out any of my ATF that let me BBF.But then if they are doing it with me there doing it with others.

But I know a lot of girls do it and they will always say they don't but they do.

I guess I have to ask.  How does the risk of being with a woman who "barebacks" increase if she
"admits to it in public."  None of the many conversations that I have had with providers about BBFS have been "in public."  Without exception, they have been in private and involved two people.

Presumeably, you prefer to use a condom and you are comfortable that you are adequately protected from disease.  So, what difference does it make what the provider does with others and who she tells?

If you trust the condom, you are adequately protected.  If you don't trust the condom, you ought not be there at all.

Does it anger you that some people have done BBFS for years, without penalty?  I'm not comfortable on a fast motorcycle, but I understand that they are fun and rewarding for those that accept the risks.  I just don't think bitchng about people who enjoy BBFS, makes you any safer from disease.

It is a sensitive topic and the ones that do so are very unlikely IMHO to want to advertise it publicly.  So, even if there is such a field, I suspect most escorts will do all they can to make sure it says that it is not available.

Lets face it guys, most of us are married, and the concept of catching ANYTHING (even strep) and sharing it with my family is a horrible one.

But what about the other question? Is the woman really making the choice, or is her driver/addiction making it for her?

For you upscale ones who do it with high level clients, no offense.



That being said, I hate condoms, and would love to find a BB friend, but I am not wealthy enough to secure loyalty

You ask "Is the woman really making the choice, or is her driver/addiction making it for her?"  

How is this question more relevant for a woman doing BBFS than a woman who doesn't do BBFS that you would, presumeably, be comfortable seeing?   Hobbyists and providers engage in "the hobby" for many different reasons, all personal to the individual.  

How would you respond if I offered my opinion as to whether your reasons are genuine and reasonable?  You might well say that your reasons are none of my business.  You would be right.

If you are so concerned about "poor wives," you should demonstrate your concern for the "poor wife" that you can actually effect, your own wife.

When you have taken care of yourself, maybe then we could talk about you taking care of everyone else.