A review went up a while ago about a massage provider who allegedly provided a HE.  Only problem is, the ad link the reviewer gave was from a therapeutic massage section and included the brick and mortar address where the lady works.  I submitted a problem report to TER but apparently they thinks it's fine as many days later the review and link are still up.  

Now there are two more reviews for this lady from guys who are pissed they didn't get a HE.  I presume that is after they checked her ad to get the address so they could visit her.  WTF?  The whole situation is totally unfair to the lady.  First that someone put up a review alleging she does something illegal with a link to her location, and then that the next two schmucks think it is something to complain about when she wisely refused.  Maybe it's just me, but I'd say the whole train wreck should be deleted and the lady send a nice apology.  

I won't be more specific on this Board but you can PM me.  Maybe if someone else submits a problem report TER will pay attention.

I just had a review rejected for giving the general area where a provider was located. I didn't provide anything near an actual address.

With any massage lady reviewed here that advertises in the therapeutic section
its always YMMV unless it specifically says : NON sexual therapeutic or massage lovers only in the ad
I would assume that extras are possible.
Idk
Maybe she thought he was cute.

I also submitted a review on a provider that has a review on here that indicated she provided more than what she does. and it was rejected because it was sexual enough. Well, that was the reason for submitting the review. So to correct a previous review and not put the provider in a uncomfortable position. I didn't expose her location and understand your statement too.
I think TER should show all reviews so if a review that says they provide certain offerings and they don't we will know that and not get put in a bad position with the provider.

I don't care if she did or she didn't, does or doesn't.  It's not the issue.  

I DON'T think TER should show all reviews submitted to them.  Nobody should be allowed to post a review alleging illegal activity which links to an advertisement that gives the brick and mortar address where she works.  That was Puck's mantra, for sure, and I am disturbed that it apparently is not official TER policy.  

The purpose of reviews is not to give LE a map so they can find providers and bust them.  Whether reviewer number 1 was telling the truth or not, his review should not have been approved for posting until he found an ad link without street address.  Which he wasn't going to find.  

Without the first review there'd be nothing to correct but in any case reviewers 2 and 3, who must have looked at the advertisement and seen the street address, had no business getting pissed that the lady didn't choose to put herself at risk for them.  Her ad contains nothing to suggest she will even if it doesn't explicitly say she won't.  

Puck was a moderator so he had no control over the information in reviews.  However, TER can be very inconsistent sometimes in what gets approved and disapproved and I have often found that simply resubmitting the problem report gets it to go through.  If you'd rather not do that then consider PMing someone with whom you are comfortable with the specific review information and they can try submitting the problem report.

That may be true but, might have been that it didn't have the address in the ad at some point as well.
There's several reviews on massage ladies that have a static location with the same conflicting information on the extras if any at that.
One thing
If LE really wants to bust someone they're going to regardless of what's written on here.
Its not that hard to ping a phone or book & ncns .

In my opinion if the ad is in the therapeutic section or even in some other ad location where its clearly not intended for adult services, then putting a link from a review that indicates adult services were available should be disallowed.  On the other hand if her ad is in the Body Rub section under adult services and she is stupid enough to include the physical address, then tough shit.  Not saying that is the case here but even if under therapeutic and she is providing extras beyond what is customary of strictly therapeutic then its also pretty dumb to provide a physical address.  And if the lady decides to continue that way and doesn't want reviews, then she should get herself delisted which is a pretty easy solution.

That's why I was saying this on an earlier thread:
Because of that grey area, non erotic massage providers shouldn't be reviewed here in the first place just so they don't have to deal with potential problems
but rather a casual board posting .
If its a very good massage with no extras it doesn't mean no one should go there at all either.
There's tons of cross over ads on backpage though its very confusing they're buying the ad space .

This board is about hobbying.  Non-erotic services shouldn't even be discussed on the message board in my opinion.   So if one of the services listed on the review profiles isn't available, why bother with the review or mention it here?   In my opinion any desire to hang out your shingle here for only a regular massage is being nothing short of a cock-tease.

Yet time after time the reviews keep being posted...

And I think TER should not allow that.  If the ad is under therapeutic massage or something similar then no review of a session there should be allowed.  If it is under erotic massage or something similar then it is fair to review it.

The whole massage area is a mess.

Consider the lady's who advertise wearing little or nothing.  Especially the cross posters in Therapeutic and Body Rubs or even Escorts (I do not go into that area much but I think it happens).  

Some are the ladies in slinky outfits are providers, some aren't.  

I am not saying a review is needed if there is a suggestion of hanky panky; but we need some place to say "hey people this is not what you think".

I think the policy should be that if the person advertises in body rubs, reviews are fair game.  If they are in Therapeutic Only, but the ad suggests more (like that famous mansion crowd) then comments in the discussion boards are more appropriate.

My two cents.