I saw this over on the legal board and I thought that this article might interest everybody. There is one thing in the article that a number of providers do not know…

Minnesota Court of Appeals ... 2009 decision stated that sexual conduct with a suspect during a sting is “outrageous conduct in violation of the guarantees of due process in the United States and Minnesota constitutions” and “unnecessary to any reasonable investigation.”

Yes...  and as I read that case and decision, I was perplexed why that officer wasn't charged with criminal sexual conduct.  I mean, really.  If someone had gone to a Massage Envy or other spa and did those things to a masseuse, you can pretty well bet he'd have been charged, so why not the cop?   That truly was outrageous.