I am a provider that prefers not to draw too much attention from undesirables, primarily LE. One of the steps I take is to control the frequency of reviews. My thought has been to limit them to no more than 3 a month, preferably 1. At times I have chosen to ask gents not to review me for an entire month.

My question is, How often do you like to see providers reviewed to feel assured she is safe, & reports about her & her services are current & accurate?

Thanks in advance for your opinions!
Leann

I like to see that a lady is still active in the business.

I agree on once or twice a month, good to know a provider is active and hopefully the reviews are consistent.

I would probably not see a provider if they asked me not to review them.  How do I know they haven't dropped their game, and why would they need to bother keeping the level of effort up if they felt they weren't going to get reviewed?  Also, the ability to get, or keep, VIP status through the writing of reviews has value to me and many, and I would not want to give that up.

I should say that, without having read the OP's reviews, I'm guessing she's a decent, hard working provider who works hard to give clients a good session.  But I still wouldn't see a provider who asked me not to review them.  I would, however, (and have), held things back when  writing reviews.  Like if a provider doesn't usually do greek, but feels confident that they can take my slender member with ease, and does.  I wouldn't include that part.

...about frequency of reviews. I think if LE wants to get you they will get you whether you have one review or a hundred. But to answer your question, I don't worry too much about how many reviews someone has, or if they haven't had one in awhile. Well, maybe unless it's been a LONG time, like a year or more.  And of course everyone will have a different answer based on their own preference so you'd be hard pressed to satisfy everyone anyway.

if she asked me in session, I'd ask why.  Like you, I rely on reviews to keep VIP status--I can certainly afford to pay for VIP, but haven't figured out how to pay for it without creating and leaving a paper trail that I don't want to leave--so I'd want to be able to review her at some point. The OP's question sounds like she'd be ok with someone doing it later (and TER accepts reviews up for encounters up to six months old), just wants to ration her monthly "visibility."  I'd be ok with delaying a review.  I'm also ok with someone with no reviews for 4-5 months, but after that, I'd begin to wonder.

In this lady's case, you're right about one thing: she's definitely "a decent, hard working provider who works hard" and gives a great time.

Yes you are right. My concern is to spread them out so I don't have a half dozen reviews or more a month. This is only a small piece of the precautions I take to prevent LE from getting too curious. The best defense, is a good offense. IMHO.

...it's becoming more and more common, in my experience, that they do not write reviews. I've come across  some who have seen quite a few ladies and never reviewed any of them. Some say this just " do not kiss and tell." And others have told me that they see ladies sporadically and don't feel the need. I respect those that prefer not to, as more and more I prefer not. It just seems slightly vulgar and unnecessary to me. I can completely understand stating what's on the menu, and if there were any complications...but other than that.. I would prefer to keep the details to myself. Espeially seeing as everyone's chemistry is different. I too, have decided on limiting my number of reviews. I found this to be an excellent question!

It's the comments as to their professionalism, hygiene and experience in the business that I look for.

This is exactly what I'm thinking and I agree, this is a great question that I've often thought about and chatting with some of my ATF's about.  

As you'll notice, I have a LOOOOOOONG gap between reviews due to going a little further under.  But the problem here lies in the fact that then gents think you are either A. Out of the Business or B. Trying to hide something.  Neither was true but the phones went quiet, eventually due to those things.  Being someone with a career outside of the hobby it is not a huge deal for me to have phones ringing off the hook but being a provider that loves seeing gents, it's almost a "necessary-evil", if you will.  

I've appreciated the responses though.  It's good to see and hear that only 1 occassionally is suitable for most gents.  

XO
CG

Or maybe not.  

I personally have zero problem--and rather like it--when I see providers concerned about their security.  

I've been asked not to post a review  when I was planning to (by a  lady who is VERY well known/highly thought of-- and a frequent poster here) and complied, even though it led to my membership downgrading here for awhile.  

Right now I think I could have my membership upgraded had I submitted a review for the last visit I had, but for security reasons (and because I think she had an off day) decided I wouldn't.  

I have asked some ladies if they want a review posted or not.  Usually I do that when they have shared some info with me that made me wonder if they might have some concerns--or if they are traveling in a location that might bring down more scrutiny than others.  

Overall, gals and gents all have different reasons for submitting or not submitting reviews.  Those reasons can change from time to time as well.  

Seems to me like common courtesy to honor each others wishes, and think about each other's safety.  I like to think that doing so brings some respect that can help you out in recommendations etc. in the future too.  

Just curious but I have not heard of a case where an escort believes she was targeted by LE because she was getting a lot of reviews.  Does anyone have experience that says LE does this sort of thing?

I have not heard of a provider being "targeted" over a lot of reviews either. I am aware however, of one provider (not in MN) who was successfully convicted & they did use her reviews as evidence against her. This is only a small step among several I have chosen to take to avoid potential trouble.  In fact, I am working gradually toward going completely UTR. Nothing for anyone to be alarmed about.

And I would have decided on my own whether to see her based on everything else I know. I have my conditions for seeing someone and she's entitled to have hers.

If we agree, fine - and if not, that's OK, too; we don't have to see each other.

And the more I think about it, it's none of my business whether her reasons are "valid" or not, as long as everything else is fine.