This isn't the first time that false reviews have been posted, apparently to gain temporary membership. While there are those gentlemen who have scruples, obviously there are those who are not, and that really screws with the integrity of the review database. Perhaps it's time to review the policy of granting membership in exchange for a review. I understand the need for trying to build the review database, but if it's not accurate, it's useless. I'd be all for it if there were some way of verifying the reviews, but I don't have any idea how to do that. If it went to a strictly voluntary system, the reviews would likely come less often, but I think there would be less chance of corruption. Self reviews (or shills) would still be possible, but more easily spotted.
I have noticed a reviewer, luvstolik, has given some stellar reviews to a couple of Twin Cities escorts. See his recent reviews of Sierra and Victoria.
In his Sierra review, he describes her as DFK, BBBJTC and anal, even though I have never seen or heard of Sierra (aka Jessica of Jessicasfriends, formerly of MGC) even being an escort who kisses passionately.
After luvstolik's review of Sierra, a couple people saw her and it was clear the services in his review were not and never were available. I personally know some guys who have seen Sierra and they report she is nice, but is nothing like the review.
Today, I noticed his stellar review of Victoria that included BBBJ and also mentioned how 'young', 'hot' and 'horny' she was and implored people to "get her now guys."
I highly suspect luvstolik is purposefully posting false information in his reviews to TER in order to get business for the escort.
srvfan, if you could please forward my comments to the site administrators, I would appreciate it. I am a paying member of TER, but I absolutely WILL NOT pay for false reviews.
If I hear nothing about this or nothing is done about this, consider my membership cancelled.
I agree - false reviews should be pulled and those proved to be false reviews. But maybe ... just maybe ... the reviewer was reviewing to gain the access to the database, not to get business for certain escorts. I can't see what a girl would have to gain off of such an overly fabricated review. It would make more sense to me, if a review was posted to gain business, the content would be closer to the truth. Remember, the helicopters are still on the ground.
This isn't the first time that false reviews have been posted, apparently to gain temporary membership. While there are those gentlemen who have scruples, obviously there are those who are not, and that really screws with the integrity of the review database. Perhaps it's time to review the policy of granting membership in exchange for a review. I understand the need for trying to build the review database, but if it's not accurate, it's useless. I'd be all for it if there were some way of verifying the reviews, but I don't have any idea how to do that. If it went to a strictly voluntary system, the reviews would likely come less often, but I think there would be less chance of corruption. Self reviews (or shills) would still be possible, but more easily spotted.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
