Also, you might re-read what I posted. There's an "or" that's pretty important. In logic, "or" is the truth-functional operator of (inclusive) disjunction, also known as alternation. Thus I disagree that my logic doesn't hold. Indeed, you've given no logical argument as to why the reviewer in that thread got "the short end of the stick". Were you in the room during the entire 12-hour session (assuming it occurred) and did you observe the BBFS and other acts that were attributed to the provider?
But if the session happened and there's no evidence to back up the provider, it's her word against the reviewer's.
And reviews back it up. How long can that go on before something happens. Never seen that one. Wierd.
two. I don't recall who found it and posted, but I think the woman was in Texas, but I could be wrong on that. You are right, though.... can't see anything going wrong there, huh??? I just can't image in this day and age why anyone M or F would engage in such activity, but.... I guess it takes all kinds. There are a few local girls that have been known to provide BBFS although they do not advertise it. There are some such reviews.
I guess if one wants the gift that keeps on giving... go for it.
Well said. The reviews confirmed it too, It just slipped i there! This is a Dallas provid
I had someone asking about BBFS the other day!!! And when I said NO!!! He said he's giving up on life & his fantasies cause he can't find anyone who will fulfill it!!! Lmfao!!!!
Ladies if you would like info on this idiot individual please pm me!!!
Sounds like a really sad/pathetic individual, and depending how serious he was, he sounds like someone who really needs help. I'm sure he can find his BBFS fantasy if he keeps looking. I just wonder if all the extras he might get (and pass along) are part of his fantasy.
In the civie world!
Then he should stay in the civie world with the BBFS!!! But this idiot wanted to do a fantasy if doing a Creampie , he's exact wording: "Bare & Sloppy seconds". I didn't know what that meant but my answer stays the same: HELLLZZZZZZ NNNNOOOOOOOO!!!!
I mean if you can't wear a condom there's the fc2 that can sub for that!!! I have clients who's tried for the first time & they love it!!!
Exactly!! I agree with you 100000% on this!!!!! I just don't know why people want to be that selfish, especially if he's married, his poor SO!!! These days you can contract hpv virus just by touching!!! It's a scary world of stds out there!!!
Play safe everyone!!!
Xox
WTF, so gross about?? It's the way nature meant for us to fucking each other! Can believe you a ho, and thinks BBFS is gross. If you truly believe you can catch something from touching, why you sucking dick bb?
Ladies if you would like info on this idiot individual please pm me!!!
Learn to read the medical journal. It's proven about hpv!!!
-- Modified on 11/23/2016 6:48:36 PM
Why you suck dick bb then. Pretty sure, there are plenty that you can catch this way too.
-- Modified on 11/23/2016 6:48:36 PM
... so guys who care at all about safety can avoid her. What's worse IMO is the BBFS that goes on secretly. And what's worse still are the low lifes who put BBFS into a review when it never happened, for revenge (she didn't do something he demanded) or some other reason.
How is that worse still?
... the provider doing BBFS when it never happened isn't a despicable act, I don't know what to say to you.
If the bbfs is a lie and therefore never occurred then there is no way of comparing it
to the dangers of true bbfs.
I would like to add it's irritating when a review isn't clear, and may even be trying to elude to it, yet never really stating bbfs outright. Maybe some of those reviews are retaliation too.
But there can be a huge impact on the provider who got the review claiming falsely that she did BBFS. I know of one case where an FBSM provider got a revenge review because she refused to do FS, so the guy said she did BBFS with him. She couldn't get the review yanked so she delisted. I'm sure that's not the only time something like that has happened.
In the case I mentioned, the guy did see the provider but lied about FS (and BB at that). In the case you linked to, the guy didn't see the provider at all. I have seen cases like the one you linked to where the review got yanked if the reviewer can produce no evidence that the session happened (e.g. an email confirming it) or if the provider has evidence the review was false, e.g. a PM with a threat to write a false review.
But if the session happened and there's no evidence to back up the provider, it's her word against the reviewer's.
according to Hajboom2 he did see the provider (ie. a written review like everyone else). And as for "the reviewer can produce no evidence that the session happened", when I saw this provider, it was all done by phone voice (ie. nothing was recorded) so your logic doesn't hold. From what I know, this reviewer got the short end of the stick here!!
But if the session happened and there's no evidence to back up the provider, it's her word against the reviewer's.
Also, you might re-read what I posted. There's an "or" that's pretty important. In logic, "or" is the truth-functional operator of (inclusive) disjunction, also known as alternation. Thus I disagree that my logic doesn't hold. Indeed, you've given no logical argument as to why the reviewer in that thread got "the short end of the stick". Were you in the room during the entire 12-hour session (assuming it occurred) and did you observe the BBFS and other acts that were attributed to the provider?
But if the session happened and there's no evidence to back up the provider, it's her word against the reviewer's.
You got 3 yawns.
Zzzzzzzz
But if the session happened and there's no evidence to back up the provider, it's her word against the reviewer's.
The facts I gave you about my session indicated no PM's or emails where sent to or from... just voice so
that would cover both your 2 "or" situations ...
1. "...the reviewer can produce no evidence that the session happened (e.g. an email confirming it)..."
2. "...the provider has evidence the review was false, e.g. a PM with a threat to write a false review...."
As for programming, I've forgotten more about computer programming then you'll ever know and learn.
And finally if you can't figure out what I meant by "From what I know", then I'm dealing with ...
i think snotz is starting to talk like a lawyer or something. He's trying to represent all the hookers out there AND he makes no sense (on purpose) as anyone that knows conversational English enjoys more joys than those that mark it up to sound like they THINK they know everything.
And laidies and gentlejerks...watch as this post disappears. It's snot a joke anymore
unless you are a fly on the wall (we all know you are a fly on the latest pile of XXXX) you won't know either. Your argument is totes lame like they all are. BTW...wait, no I'm not going to show that card yet.
lying review that paints a provider in a positive light (looks/services) that simply ain't warranted. You're right that BS reviews suck but they in many ways are the norm in the last two years.
Please knots...this is just a question to all and not an attack against you nor even directed at you. Don't take it personally. I'm simply posting a counterpoint to enhance the discussion.
Both providers and hobbyists alike. Period.
Please knots...this is just a question to all and not an attack against you nor even directed at you. Don't take it personally. I'm simply posting a counterpoint to enhance the discussion.
It's natures way. You old people show know better, in the 70s and 80s, no one gives a shit about condom. Just pull it out method.
That pull it out method only worked when we remembered or could focus clearly lol. Good times back then for sure.
Good joke.
A man (?) of few meaningless words. Keep it up baby Einstein.
After HIV infection, the virus replicates rapidly because there are no antibodies. During this phase it is asymptomatic
Infectiousness occurs, as I understand it, within just a couple weeks of exposure.
Symptoms occur a couple weeks after infection but are non-descript, flu like.
The pull it out method deals (poorly) with pregnancy. It does not do anything for HIV.
It takes three months for the HIV antibody to turn positive so HIV screening tests are not valid until then.
I assume based on what you say on the board that you are a high frequency hobbyist. So this means you are potentially, even despite a negative HIV test from time to time, risking having communicable HIV between tests if you are having BBFS.
How often do you get HIV tested?
How do you know the ladies you see are not HIV positive?
How do you manage the infectious risk to yourself or to others given your comments on BBFS and you?
Just curious.
No PMs
But to your points: HIV is but one of many serious diseases one can contract via unprotected sex.
-- Modified on 11/23/2016 7:42:47 PM
You might want to check definition of WK.
Talon posted a sarcastic, tongue-in-cheek comment which you took seriously and proceeded to respond with your best clinical/medical explanation and verbiage..... which, by the way, fell short.
My comment was not being a WK for Talon. It was a gentle comment to a brainless feck pointing out what was obvious to most others. That's all. I was politely letting you know you didn't get his comment. But thanks for the non-medical advice Dr. Pimple. I'll take 2 aspirins and call you when I give a fuck.
Check's in the mail.
I'll look for a job tomorrow.
I'll pull it out before I cum.
No more. It's Thanksgiving. You've all had plenty of leeway, now go find something else to do other than post in this thread please before bans start getting thrown around.