My last ten consecutive shills have been echoed with a +1 by a particular poster. This poster does not have other shills for these providers, reviews for them or whitelists by them so there is no direct evidence that he has seen them. Does anyone understand this practice?  
Respectfully submitted, WK2014.
 
Re: [xxx] +1  
Posted 2/7/2015 11:42:34 AM by wadzilla69
 
Re: [xxx] +1  
Posted 1/31/2015 12:29:12 AM by wadzilla69
 
Re: [xxx] +1  
Posted 1/4/2015 9:14:01 AM by wadzilla69
 
Re: [xxx] +1  
Posted 1/2/2015 9:25:42 PM by wadzilla69
 
Re: [xxx] +1  
Posted 11/28/2014 3:18:12 PM by wadzilla69
 
Re: [xxx] +1  
Posted 11/23/2014 8:37:06 AM by wadzilla69
 
Re: [xxx] +1  
Posted 11/23/2014 8:36:32 AM by wadzilla69
 
Re: [xxx] +1  
Posted 11/23/2014 8:36:05 AM by wadzilla69
 
Re: [xxx] +1  
Posted 11/23/2014 8:35:35 AM by wadzilla69
 
Re: [xxx] +1  
Posted 11/23/2014 8:34:46 AM by wadzilla6

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAROv-V783

You see, a kind, thoughtful gentleman PMed me recently about Julie, and he included a link to one of her reviews (from many years ago, and only one of hundreds but anyway...) that mentioned bbfs.  Now, this gentleman has no way to know whether that review is accurate, and Julie does have a sterling reputation in the industry.  And anyone who's been around the hobby for awhile knows that many reviews depict things that, well, just didn't happen as the reviewer would like us to believe.  But I was touched by this gentleman having such concern for my health and safety that he reached out to me, unsolicited, to warn me about Julie... even though he admitted that he personally would never piss away his money on a woman like her.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdCjbJ6NEf

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/submitReview.asp