http://minneapolis.backpage.com/BodyRubs/thursday-is-two-pops-for-the-price-of-one-day/15435316

I've seen her a few times at two different places under 2 different names.  There are better and more reliable out there.

I was implying she has no reviews and was looking to see if anyone could provide more info.

https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=309458

He sure seems to have a better time than most people when seeing massage girls...

I saw her a number of weeks ago.  CFG's review, as many of his other reviews, is simply not accurate- IMO, and CFG's reviews are suspect to me.  While she is a nice girl, the pics are NOT accurate.  She is flabby in the tummy and has marks from bearing kids and her behind is nowhere near as firm as those pics would have you believe.  Furthermore she has lots of ink.  My session was maybe a solid 6 at best.  She's worth a visit. Not saying don't see her.  Just go in knowing what you'll see.

OK...  wasn't sure.  I submitted a reply to Rxyman's post that should answer your questions.  But I've seen her. Haven't repeated and likely won't. Nice girl. Lots of ink. Sort of rushed.  She's not a 9 as CFG indicates.  Not on a scale of 1 to 10, anyway.

...I have started to write more about CFG and others.  NO WAY IN HELL are all those girls 8s or 9s, and NO WAY IN HELL are all their sessions so great.  Period.   Thanks for speaking up!  

I've seen a few of his 8/9, to me they are all 5/6/7.  He's marketing $$ from these girls for sure.

Guys beauty is in the eye of the beholder. One guys 10 is another guys 2

... apparently anything that wears a skirt (or short shorts) is an 8, 9. or 10 to at least one person.  There is no objectivity there and we can see that.  I've seen a good number of those girls, and I am pretty sure they are not all 8, 9, or 10, and their sessions are not all 7s or 8s.

1) His scores are almost always as good a score as the provider has gotten
2) Often he is the only review or one of the very first reviews for a given provider
3) None of these providers has given him a whitelist
4) Little board activity and none for quite some time

A second review came up today for her. Notice any similarities?  

...amazingly, the old Lorelei reviews have vanished.  The ones that indicated she was DIY.....   Not sure what her menu is now, but I KNOW FOR A FACT that she had reviews from the past....   could be her menu has opened up and a new, fresh start, but I cannot state as fact or give an opinion since  I have not seen her since her "return."

is correct twice a day.  That is such an insightful post by a guy who consistently ranks a couple points lower than other well known reviewers, brags about it and calls women ho's.

I'm slowly switching to low volume high quality experiences.

Well, I am not sure what some of you are proposing however, it is true I am a glass is half full guy! And I tend to like to create friendly relationships with the women I see. Yes, I see them as women, people, not what some of you are referring to them as property or worse. In addition, I have only one TER acct. If I am not mistaken TER won't allow you to have two. All of this does make me laugh, so much gossip and drama on this site it is a crack up.  

... may you live long in your land, prosper and propagate !!  

Multiple accounts reviewing the same set of providers; usually their earliest reviews and better than what others give.

you know...  multiple devices at various locations...  and, of course the assistants and friends

... of the depths to which this board has sunk.  

Suddenly, NW293'S review of Frankie (where in the text in the general details were IDENTICAL to CFG's review) has disappeared?!  

I nominate the 8th dwarf to be the creative fun guy

what's your point

Some of us know better than to turn them off so syndicate clients can't try to bribe their way into our business.

a popular couple I know.

It just makes everyone question the judgement of those 6.

It's not one thing; it's the combination of all of them that makes me suspicious.