Minnesota

Well, that was one helluva discussion ....regular_smile
srvfan 6 Reviews 14860 reads
posted

First, thanks to all who responded to the discussion about improving TER and a possible area for "escorts only".

I am surprised at the emotion it brought out but then again, I learn something new every time I get myself in the middle of one of these things.

As a follow up, I will condense ideas, suggestions, etc. and send them to the TER administrator. We'll see where it goes from there.

This is a great group of people. Let's keep up the discussions.

One last thought .... I heard this stupid joke on KQ today:
Q: What do you call a lesbian with a long tongue?
A: Well-hung

THE TC MOD

The reviews already list, in detail, what a provider does, and does not do.  The performance rating should simply measure how well she does it.  If the rating mixes how good it was with what was done it's less useful for the hobbiest.  For example, if I want a REALLY good kiss but don't care about greek and bbbj then I should be able to search for providers that kiss and see performance ratings that are heavily influenced by how well she kisses.  I can't do that now because WHAT the provider does impacts the rating.  Providers who do not kiss as well but do greek and bbbj will probably get a higher rating.  A provider that does everything increadibly well and is wonderful to be with should be able to get a 10 even if everything is covered.  It's not a question of fairness or safety, it's a question of better information for us hobbiests.

You guys have had a great discussion regarding the review process.  I've always thought to myself "You Can't Fight City Hall!"  But now I wonder--again, great job!

Register Now!