I am not sure what is going on, but for the 3rd time, in the past year I have had a review "unapproved ".  The reason being that it did not give enough details. I have read reviews that were approved with far less details than mine. I resubmitted each one trying to make things more detailed. Has anyone else had this experience? I hope they don't want us to make stuff up, because we rely on the accuracy of what to expect when we see a provider. I have been on here a long time and know enough really fun ladies that I don't really need this if they don't want me here. I do it to help others get to know the ladies and what to expect.

Are you able to review what you wrote ?  
What I always suggest to my reviewers is to safe it in a draft so that they can copy and pasted it on more than one site  

I was going to ask if you’re open to removing the providers name and sending it to me in a dm ? Because I’m also curious to know what I might be able to pick up  

I like analyzing and making guesses

Exactly how TER decides when a review lacks enough details is puzzling at times when you see some of the ones that do get approved but so long as the ones you resubmit get approved then I'd just stick with that.  You can also DM them next time and ask them what specifically is the problem.  Sometimes, that's all it takes to fix the problem.

Have not written many recently but one of my very first mentioned a great BBJ. Got sent back asking what was great about it . Actually wrote nothing more about the BBJ but added a line here and there and got approved in like minutes.
Recently had a review not published for about a week . Finally asked why - no answer except published in about an hour.  
Consistent in their inconsistencies.

I expressed my frustration to the powers that be and it was approved.

almost always on the basis of not enough details.
And it drives me crazy. Sometimes I have just given up. Sometimes I have added details, sometimes complained and then it has been allowed.
I think they employ relatively less gifted and maybe younger editors and that is the first issue.
But the second is that they are not giving enough guidance to them.
Reviews are of real value when they are timely and written to help, both hobbyists and sometimes providers.
These days those are the only reasons I write.

But TER doesn't prioritize that and so fake reviews and useless information and multiple reviews for high volume providers stream onto the list first. And it makes me nuts.

I have had frustrations as well.

I also had them get denied for "not enough details".  I think the reason why because I scored them at a level and it didn't meet the requirements type thing.   Lets say i rated them a 9 for performance and I didn't mention they did a BBBJ, anal, DFK, etc.   I think that is the issue.

You can write 10 paragraphs but if you dont have that stuff included that meets the requirements for the rating is why they state "not enough details".

That would be my guess.

And it's also why endless 6/6 and 7/7 reviews are posted, screwing up the ratings system, and deflating the numerical rep of numerous providers.
Credible, useful reviews are the core of TER. Management needs to get a grip.

Is endless  9s and 10s for appearance.  Majority providers here are 8 at absolute maximum on a super good day!  7 is more realistic.

At least theres a consistent basis for the rejections which suggest there's only one person looking at the reviews or that theyre using AI to process them.  My guess would be the latter.

but the scale is a scale and if it sits in the middle it's almost useless.
So you say 8 is the max. In the last few years several reviewers describe having an amazing time and rate it a 7.

On the other end, many people have 6 as the lowest number.
So now the scale is 6-7-8 and useless.

Another persons 6 is another's 10.

Also one person could have a great time with a provider because of things other than sex.  Could have a great connection.

That is the problem with a "rating" scale.  That is also why many providers dislike this site or don't consent to reviews or have a "no review" policy.

Anyways we dont need to talk about it.

What the OP was asking about was the WHY some get denied.  

I am talking about appearance only! Having an amazing time would be  performance.

" I showed up, we bang, was Gouda"  
- Approved -

"He crawls up, between my legs where he stops to rid me of my sodden panties. He slings it away carelessly, his ogling eyes never leaving the naked place they covered. He continues to stare, licking his lips – obviously beyond aroused by the sight but there’s nothing to hide my intimate folds and I feel exposed, squirming and certain that my blush reaches all the way down there."  
- Not enough details! Rejected

Like most rejection in my life I just move on now and only resubmit when I need VIP  
otherwise it just becomes a personal note/reminder for me so I know who've I met or who to avoid

I know some providers hate the details, or the scoring, but for others it has built their business.
And the only reason TER has any value to johns is reviews too.
 It is the TER engine. So TER needs to pay better attention to them.  
E.G. About 4 reviews of mine have been rejected when I wrote about a scam, carefully, in detail, "but not enough details" of sex of course. I had to then write to Support, explain what was going on, and 50% of the time there was success. Which is not enough to justify the work but there you go.
In the meantime people writing crap can do whatever they want as long as they rate it 7/7, and they do.

OH I agree that it is the main reason for TER and what not.

The main reason why I come here is to make sure they are not a scam.  Which i dont understand why the moderators dont understand when you talk about a scam they dont post those reviews.  The other is possible services they offer or dont offer.  That why you dont need to get specific in communication via text or anything.  Then you dont need to have an ackward convo that can throw off the mood right away.  IE: you know if they do those services or if they dont going in.

Also if the apperence is moderatly the same or not.  DEPENDING if your doing "agency" type asian, latino, etc.  OR if someone has aged, gained weight, etc.  

I also know chemistry is a case by case situation.  But many dont think this way at all.

But that is why a standard rating can throw things off.  Like mentioned per looks my 10 can be your 3.   My idea of a 10 in performance could be someones elses 2.   That is why the typical "standard" scale of 1-10 is off.    

IMHO should get ride of that type of scale.  Just do services rendered type thing (just like they have know the "check boxes") and then talk about how the experience went.   I know some like to write novels to make them seem like the next porn star in the making.  While others are more down to earth.

One thing I wish that TER would add in to the reviews for each individual one is a time length.   IE: did you see the provider for 30 min, hour, 90, over night, etc.   It could help others know what to expect as well.