MEXICO

Re: Burt: please ignore him
Burt2010 9 Reviews 6799 reads
posted
1 / 15

El Grito de Dolores (Cry of Independence) and Dia de la Independencia (Independence Day) September 15-16

At dawn on Sunday, September 16, 1810, while Napolean's troops were occupying Spain and King Ferdinand VII of Spain was still in captivity , Miguel Hidalgo y Costilla, a fifty-seven-year-old priest from an old family of criollos (Mexican-born Spaniards) launched the movement that resulted in Mexico's independence. He had begun to harangue his parishioners in the small town of Dolores in the state of Guanajuato, "seducing them" (according to a chronicle of the time) to rise up in arms - even with stones, slings, sticks or spears - in order to defend their religion against the "French heretics" who had occupied Spain since 1808 and now threatened to come over to the Americas.

alerted by Josefa Ortiz de Dominquez ("La Corregidora") that his revolutionary plot had been discovered and that he would soon be arrested, he brought his plans forward and, with the Grito de Dolores delivered in religious language and from the belfry of his defence against the usurpers of authority and the enemies of Fernando VII. In doing this, Hidalgo started the great revolt of 1810. His battle cry was: "Long live the Virgin of Guadalupe, and Death to the Spaniards!"

What Hidalgo intended - and accomplished - was to launch his flock against the hated gachupines (Spaniards born in Spain and living in Mexico) "who had been exploiting the wealth of the Mexican people with the greatest injustice for three hundred years." Within a month, he had been joined by more than fifty thousand men, mainly Indians from the poorest levels of society. Attracted by his religious magnetism and by other, less noble motives, this multitude devastated the cities of San Miguel, Celaya, and Guanajuato.

In less than a year he was at the gates of Mexico City, with an army big enough to capture it. For reasons that have puzzled historians he retreated. Some analysts point out that he feared he could not control the mob once they have taken the city, which while ungarded, was to receive reinforcements soon.

He was apprehended in a battle along with other leaders of the revolution, among them Ignacio Allende, José Mariano Jiménez and Juan Aldama. Since he was a clergyman Hidalgo could not be immediately executed. A few months later, in July of 1811, he was tried by the Inquisition and excommunicated. Subsequently he was condemned to death by the civil authorities. The four leaders were executed in Chihuahua, three of them on June 26, 1811 and Miguel Hidalgo on July 30, 1811 After being decapitated their heads were put in the four corners of the Alhóndiga de Granaditas in Guanajuato as a way to scare off the revolution.

But by then the seed had begun to sprout. The Mexican War of Independence, a truly popular movement led by four hundred armed parish priests, ended with Mexico being a independent nation.

On September 15, 1910 in preparation for the 100th anniversary of Mexico's independence special envoys from Spain gathered on the illuminated balconies of the National Palace and watched the fiesta of all fiestas in preparation for the grito de independencia, the "cry of independence" that was to arrive with the coming dawn. However, at 11:00 pm on September 15, 1910, President Porfirio Diaz stood on the main balcony of the National Palace, and once again rang the same bell Hidalgo had rung in Dolores. He shouted several vivas: "Long Live the Heroes of the Nation!" "Long Live the Republic!" Below him, in the majestic zócalo that, from the days of the Aztecs had been the ceremonial heart of the Mexican Nation, a hundred thousand voices shouted in reply "¡VIVA!"

But why had the President delivered this grito at 11 p.m. on the night of the September 15th rather than at dawn on September 16th, when it all really began? A minor historical license: September 15 was the Day of Saint Porfirio (a Greek saint of the fourth century) and the birthday of President Poririo Diaz. Thus today Mexico's Independence Day celebration lasts two days.

-------------

This is taken from something I posted on another board, which was garbled during an upgrade.

WymenLover 36 Reviews 4389 reads
posted
2 / 15

Your history lessons are appreciated.

I'll add the following from memory:

I believe Mexico became independent in 1821, but that a Mexican flag was not raised in Old Town San Diego until 1822 because it took that long for the news to get here.

Kadjevic 5692 reads
posted
3 / 15

Posted By: WymenLover
Your history lessons are appreciated.

I'll add the following from memory:

I believe Mexico became independent in 1821, but that a Mexican flag was not raised in Old Town San Diego until 1822 because it took that long for the news to get here.
Well, I doubt anyone really cared enough.  Mexican independence, like American independence, is not taught in schools in Europe.  They will briefly touch on it during the 4th and 5th year of University depending on the field of study.  For the most part, it's ignored.

The history account that Burt posted is extremely one-sided, obviously an anti-European undertone talking about how Spaniards were "hated"  (hated so much, Mexicans still speak Spanish).  Besides, I would like to see some type of evidence that Mexico is truly an independent country and does not do everything the power structure in Europe tells them to.  Almost all of the most powerful Mexican senators and presidents retire to Europe.  Wonder why that is?

It's just another holiday for people to take off work for a week.  Has no real-world significance.

Burt2010 9 Reviews 5532 reads
posted
4 / 15

Who gives a "flying frisbee" about Europe and what Europeans think or teach.  They're part of the past.  Given their birth rate Europeans are on the path to extinction; it won't be long before Europe is almost totally populated by immigrants from Pakistan, India, Turkey, etc.  

The world is now lead by the United States--it's American food, movies, clothes, music, computers, etc. the world wants. Not the cheeses and wine of a "has-been" country like France or the overpriced watches the Swiss can still peddle to those who don't have something, like a Seiko, that makes economic sense.  Even with the huge gov't subsidies that are given to Airbus it's that good old American capitalistic company Boeing that is number one.  And, of course, it's American English--not some European language like French or German--that's become the world's universal second language.  (I wonder if that's because the good old US of A, not Europe, that for the past century or more has been moving the world forward with its inventions and innovations such as the train, car, airplane, pharmaceuticals, telephone, computers, Internet, etc. etc. etc.  During this time what has Europe done?  It gave the world Fascism, Nazism, and Communism.  It's started two world wars, that took the US to end and we're still feeling the effects of the damage done by Europe's colonialism--just look at Iraq invading Kuwait a few year ago because of the way Europe drew lines on a map, or the love and harmony the exist today between India and Pakistan.  Let not forget all the problems in Viet Nam that were the outgrown of France's Indo-China colonial rule.)

The reason people "retire" to places like Spain and France is because Europe provides sanctuary for criminals--just as France has done for years for that pedophile Roman Polaski.  Talk about being soft on crime, Europeans started opposing the death penalty immediately after WWII to protect Nazi's from the only just, fitting, and morally appropriate penalty for the crimes they committed.  

In time, of course, it will be China and India that will be impacting the world.  When that happens the few remaining native Europeans will find their grapes even more sour than they do today.


-- Modified on 9/22/2010 8:03:40 PM

Kadjevic 7422 reads
posted
5 / 15

Posted By: Burt2010
Who gives a *&$#! about Europe and what Europeans think.  They're part of the past.  Given their birth rate Europeans are on the path to extinction; it won't be long before Europe is populated by immigrants from Pakistan, India, Turkey, etc.  

The future is now determined by the United States--it's American food, movies, clothes, music, computers, etc. the world wants. Not the cheeses and wine of a "has-been" country like France or the overpriced watches the Swiss can still peddle to those who don't have something, like a Seiko, that makes economic sense.

Tthe reason people "retire" to places like Spain and France is because Europe is soft on crime.  It provides sanctuary for criminals--just as France has done for years for that pedophile Roman Polaski.  As a matter of fact, Europeans started opposing the death penalty to protect Nazi's for the only morally appropriate penalty for the crimes they committed.  

In time, of course, it will be China and India that will be impacting the world.  When that happens the few remaining native Europeans will find their grapes even more sour than they do today.
Well first of all, Seiko comes from Japan, not Switzerland.  Speaking of Nazis, I believe it was the United States that gave asylum to many (project paperclip).

I suppose if I'm European, I'm a Nazi as well.  That makes a lot of sense.  Additionally, the birth rate in the United States is about the same as it is in Europe, depending on the country.  The US is at about 13.8 births per 1,000 people.  France is 12.57, and the UK is 10.65, so I don't know where that logic about extinction comes from either.  Oh, and iPhones are made in China, my friend.

You just pull random facts out of thin air.  You're of course entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts.  Just as the "prostitution is legal" bit you went on with nothing but hearsay to back it up, while I copy the state penal code.

To be quite honest, it's that attitude that gives the United States the image that it has in the world.  Constantly fighting with other nations, claiming to be superior by birth, and basically drawing a parallel between the hundreds of millions of Europeans who live in the EU and Nazis of the 1930's.    I could also say the same regarding immigration in the United States.  You have what, 10% of your population as illegal immigrants, mainly from Mexico among other places?  I don't think that EU immigration even compares to those numbers.

And here is the million dollar question - what on earth are you doing in Mexico?  Wait.. I think I know.  If you tried to go to the EU, Japan, or Australia with that attitude, you would be cast out of society rather quickly.  In Mexico they might tolerate it since the population is very eager to be 'American'.  But then again, that's assuming you do mingle with the respectable part of Mexican society, which I doubt you do, considering your knowledge of Mexico is limited to Zona Norte hearsay and vague ramblings about Nazis, Swiss watches like Seiko (made in Japan),  and how Europe is a "thing of the past".

When you go into a respectable place in Mexico you might hear snickering and laughing - they're laughing at you Burt.  I doubt you even have to say anything for your mindset to be conveyed to others.

Burt2010 9 Reviews 5659 reads
posted
6 / 15

This will come as a shock to you:  Mexicans love me.  I have a lot of friends in Mexico who welcome me into their homes.  I enjoy Mexico because of the warmth of the Mexican people and the richness of their culture.  (It's people, like Europeans, who have their nose in the air that I don't like--and who don't like me.)

One of reasons Mexicans like me is because I don't treat them like Europeans do, meaning I don't look down my nose at them.  I like their food and music. I  don't use a lemo because I think their taxis are too dirty.    Etc.

------------

BTW, name me three things of the magnitude of the airplane, telephone, and computer that Europe has given the world during the past century.  Too hard?  Then name me one.

Burt2010 9 Reviews 6680 reads
posted
7 / 15

Posted By: Kadjevic

You just pull random facts out of thin air.
Read on.  Let's see who pulls his facts out of thin air--and who doesn't.
Posted By: Kadjevic

Just as the "prostitution is legal" bit you went on with nothing but hearsay to back it up, while I copy the state penal code.
On the contrary, my opinions come from attorneys licensed to practice law in Mexico.  BTW, the statue you love to quote says things like pimping and pandering are illegal, not prostitution per se.  (I read it.  You should re-read it.  Also, when you quote laws be sure to quote those that apply to Tijuana.  Prostitution is governed by state and municipal law not, for example, the law governing someplace like DF. )
Posted By: Kadjevic

Additionally, the birth rate in the United States is about the same as it is in Europe, depending on the country.  The US is at about 13.8 births per 1,000 people.  France is 12.57, and the UK is 10.65, so I don't know where that logic about extinction comes from either.
When using statistics to support an opinion it's important to understand what they mean; apparently you don't.

A study by the Rand Corporation says:   “Across Europe, birth rates are falling and family sizes are shrinking. The total fertility rate is now less than two children per woman in every member nation in the European Union.”  That’s where my idea that native Europeans are on the road to extinction.
Posted By: Kadjevic

... regarding immigration in the United States.  You have what, 10% of your population as illegal immigrants, mainly from Mexico among other places?  I don't think that EU immigration even compares to those numbers.
The International Organization for Migration (IOM) said "there are more than 200 million migrants around the world today. Europe hosted the largest number of immigrants, with 70.6 million people in 2005, the latest year for which figures are available. North America, with over 45.1 million immigrants, is second, followed by Asia, which hosts nearly 25.3 million."  (Since you doubt me, Google it.)  That's where I get my idea that Europe is becoming a land of immigrants, especially when the European birth rate is too low to sustain the current level of native Europeans.

You don't know what you're talking about when you post about the laws governing prostitution in Tijuana.  Nor do you know what you're talking about when you post about immigration rates and the birth rate in Europe.

But I know you, somehow you'll find a way to claim you know more about immigration than does the International Organization of Migration and more about European birth rates than the Rand Corporation.  Why not, you think you known more about the law than does a former Mexican federal prosecutor (because you misread a statue and consulted some cops).

-----------------

Once again:  name me three things of the magnitude of the airplane, telephone, and computer that Europe has given the world during the past century.  Too hard?  Then name me one.  (You should be able to name at least a dozen if Europe and Europeans are half of what you think they are.)







-- Modified on 9/22/2010 9:16:42 PM

Kadjevic 6512 reads
posted
8 / 15

Posted By: Burt2010
Posted By: Kadjevic

You just pull random facts out of thin air.
Read on.  
Posted By: Kadjevic

Just as the "prostitution is legal" bit you went on with nothing but hearsay to back it up, while I copy the state penal code.
On the contrary, my opinions come from attorneys licensed to practice law in Mexico.  BTW, the statue you love to quote says things like pimping and pandering are illegal, not prostitution per se.  (I read it.  You should re-read it.  Also, when you quote laws be sure to quote those that apply to Tijuana, not, for example, DF.)
Posted By: Kadjevic

... regarding immigration in the United States.  You have what, 10% of your population as illegal immigrants, mainly from Mexico among other places?  I don't think that EU immigration even compares to those numbers.
The International Organization for Migration (IOM) said there are more than 200 million migrants around the world today. Europe hosted the largest number of immigrants, with 70.6 million people in 2005, the latest year for which figures are available. North America, with over 45.1 million immigrants, is second, followed by Asia, which hosts nearly 25.3 million.  (Since you doubt me, Google it.)

You don't know what you're talking about when you post about the laws governing prostitution in Tijuana.  Nor do you know what you're talking about when you post about immigration rates.

But I know you, somehow you'll find a way to claim you know more about immigration than does the International Organization of Migration.  Why not, you think you known more about the law than does a former Mexican federal prosecutor (because you misread a statue and consulted some cops).

-- Modified on 9/22/2010 8:37:13 PM
Let's start from the top, shall we?  The penal code I cited states that anyone who invites another to 'commercio carnal' is guilty of 'ultrajes a la moral publica'.  That's a nice way of indicating prostitution both ways.  If you say "Can I get a GFE for $100?" then that covers that, or if a woman says "I'll give you GFE for $100", that covers that, too.  Re-read? I have it in front of me, mate.  Again, you cite sources that are hearsay:  "I know a lawyer".  That's hearsay.  Doesn't matter how many times you say it, it's still third party information.  Not all hearsay is always bad, but when the statute conflicts with what you say, then you might have as well said Santa Claus told you.  I don't care what "Burt's buddy" says, I go by what the law says.  At the end of the day, if you're standing before the judge, the "Burt's buddy said" defense will not hold up.

The Federal Penal Code applies to all cities and states in Mexico.  The stricter of the two statutes applies between Federal, State, and Municipal.  So don't go thinking that something in the Federal Penal Code does not apply to you if you're not in Mexico City.  Actually, you can think it all you want, just don't tell that to other people like it's a solid fact, when it's just your warped interpretation of the facts, kind of like how Seiko is from Switzerland, supposedly.  Again, entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts.

First, you go talking about EU immigration from places like India and Turkey.  I point out the stats of illegal immigration in the US, and then you compare total immigration (both legal and illegal) on the entire European continent.  Can we compare apples to apples, please?  Everyone in the US is an immigrant at some level, because after all, it was a European colony.  Plus, North America is several countries, not just the United States.  Again, quoting Wikipedia articles will not get you very far with anyone with a brain.  It might work in the Cuahuila on all of those "college students" but not here.

You harvest your own facts from your imagination, and then when that doesn't work, you twist other facts to suit your position.  And no, the EU and Europe are not the same thing.  Does the IOM count illegal immigration?  I know your government doesn't, so how can they?  Only you could take a statement about the EU, apply it to all of the European continent, talk about ALL immigration across the board (French living in Germany, British living in Italy, etc.) and then contrast it with the entire North American continent, and then claim that this is accurately reflecting the point you were making.

Kadjevic 4833 reads
posted
9 / 15

Posted By: Burt2010
This will come as a shock to you:  Mexicans love me.  I have a lot of friends in Mexico who welcome me into their homes.  I enjoy Mexico because of the warmth of the Mexican people and the richness of their culture.  (It's people, like Europeans, who have their nose in the air that I don't like--and who don't like me.)

One of reasons Mexicans like me is because I don't treat them like Europeans do, meaning I don't look down my nose at them.  I like their food and music. I  don't use a lemo because I think their taxis are too dirty.    Etc.

------------

BTW, name me three things of the magnitude of the airplane, telephone, and computer that Europe has given the world during the past century.  Too hard?  Then name me one.
I don't put my nose up at anyone.  I just don't care for dirty places or uneducated and belligerent people. And no, not all Mexicans fall into this category at all.  Some of them do, however, which is the case in any country.  Again with your generalizations, I dislike a few places in Tijuana and don't care for a certain crowd, and now I have something against all 110 million Mexican people.

It's debated on who really had the "first" computer, but it was pioneered in Germany in the 1930's as adding machines.  Germany is part of the EU by the way, just in case you wanted to make up your own facts on that one.

The television was invented by an Italian man in the 19th century.  Italy is part of the EU also.

I can keep going.  You wanted one invention, but there's two for you for you to digest while you scour Wikipedia in hopes of providing more "facts" to back up your statements.  I'm not turning this into a EU vs US contest.  But to say that Europe's place is "in the past" and to constantly criticize Europeans is a little naive.

Europeans don't mistreat Mexicans as a whole like you claim.  Quite a few European people live in Mexico and I fail to see this anti-Mexican European tone you speak of.  Why do Mexicans always criticize the United States?  They do so to the point where it even seems tacky to me.  When I meet people and they speak to me, they say something to the effect of "Thank god you're not an American." or something similar.  Personally, I don't have a problem with Americans, but they seem to.  My problem is with the American attitude that some, not all, Americans display, such as yourself.  The superiority visions about leading the world, and freedom, and how everyone wants to be you.  Quite disillusioned if you ask me.

Burt2010 9 Reviews 3733 reads
posted
10 / 15

As I predicted, you think you know more than:

--Attorneys licensed to practice law in Mexico do about the law.
--The International Organization of Migration does about immigration.
--The Rand Corporation does about birth rates.

---------------

I think it would be better to be represented in court by an attorney (one of "Burt's buddies" whose advice you consider hearsay) than it would be to tell the judge, "I read the law and ...".  

----------------

Returning to the subject that started this discussion:

For the third time:  name me three things of the magnitude of the airplane, telephone, and computer that Europe has given the world during the past century.  Too hard?  Then name me one.  (You should be able to name at least a dozen if Europe and Europeans are half of what you think they are.)

I'm still waiting for an answer.


-- Modified on 9/22/2010 9:42:47 PM

Kadjevic 6886 reads
posted
11 / 15

Posted By: Burt2010
As I predicted, you think you know more than:

--Attorneys licensed to practice law in Mexico do about the law governing prostitution.
--The International Organization of Migration does about immigration.
--The Rand Corporation does about birth rates.

---------------

I'd think it would be better to be represented in court by an attorney (one of "Burt's buddies" whose advice you consider hearsay) than it would be to tell the judge, "I read the law and ...".  I think most other people would agree with me.

----------------

Returning to the subject that started this discussion:

For the third time:  name me three things of the magnitude of the airplane, telephone, and computer that Europe has given the world during the past century.  Too hard?  Then name me one.  (You should be able to name at least a dozen if Europe and Europeans are half of what you think they are.)

I'm still waiting for an answer.







-- Modified on 9/22/2010 9:33:21 PM
I got the birth rates from your CIA's world fact book website.  I'd say that is accurate information, unless you don't think it is.

Who said anything about representation?  I'm saying that if someone on here has legal problems due to your assertations of legality, they will be in hot water when they try to use hearsay of some unknown attorney as their defense.  I'm sure your attorney can do his best to take your money and argue a case for you, but as I've said repeatedly, I don't care what you think the law is, I'm citing the penal code and telling others not to take your word as fact, because you're wrong.  I care about other people who don't know about Mexico and might think that you know something since you state so strongly your opinion (which is the opinion of a third party) and state it as indisputable fact, which it's not.

I already answered you about your one thing of magnitude.  Television and computers.  Italian and German, respectively.  You'll be waiting a while until you can learn to read, I imagine, since my answer is a direct reply to your question and there for all to read, including yourself.

Your reading comprehension of my above post about the television and the computer is probably on par with your reading skills in the penal code:  non-existent.

EDIT:  Just for fun, I'll give my third invention to make this hat-trick complete for you.  The internal combustion engine and the automobile.  The internal combustion engine (for all of you Burts out there, that's what's under the bonnet of your car) was invented by the Swiss, the four-stroke engine was invented by the French, and the first car was made by the British.  I know these happened in the 19th century, but so did your telephone example.

I hope three satisfies your requirement.

-- Modified on 9/22/2010 9:58:30 PM

Burt2010 9 Reviews 4644 reads
posted
12 / 15

I said “gave to the world” not invented.  The reason is there are too many debates over who invented what.  The truth is when inventions are made there are usually several people who independently at approximately the same time invent something similar.  Some fade into the dust bin of history while others go on to change the world.  

Take the discovery of the Americas.  People argue if the Vikings, Phoenicians, Chinese, etc.  “discovered” the Americas.  But it was Columbus who “gave the world” the knowledge of the Americas.  It was his voyages that changed the world.

Who invented the computer depends to a large degree on the definition of what is a computer.  It’s true that some consider the Z1 invented by  Conrad Zuse (a German) to be the first computer.  It’s also true that it was destroyed  by allied bombers in WWII and did not lead to the computers in common usage today.  (It was IBM, Apple, Microsoft—take your pick—that “gave to the world” the computers we use today.)

Paul Nipkow patented the scanning disk in 1884, but his invention didn’t lead to television as the world knows it.  It was Philo Farmsworth (an American) and RCA that in 1927 “gave to the world” what we know as television.   Henry Ford didn’t invent the piston engine, but he, more than anyone else, “gave to the world” automobiles as we know them today.  He also “gave to the world” the assembly line and thus manufacturing as world knows it.  Etc. Etc. Etc.

The point I was making above is that it is America—not Europe—that for the last century or more has lead the world in innovation, science and technology. In contrast Europe “gave the world” Facism, Nazism, Communism, two world wars and a colonial legacy (because of the way they drew lines on the map and failed to educate and train those in their colonial empires) is still creating problems today.  Viet Nam, Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait, the Pakistan-India conflict, etc. are  Europe’s legacy.  As I said before, what happens in Europe today does not shape the world—the world’s “mover and shaker” for the past century has been America.  

What Europe and Europeans do and think and teach is really of little or no consequence to the modern world.  The world’s “mover and shaker” for the past century has been America. The future probably belongs to China and India, but Europe’s place is in the dust bin of history.

As I said above, America “gave to the world” airplanes, pharmaceutical, telephones, computers, the Internet, etc.  I again challenge you to name me things of this magnitude that Europe “gave to the world.”  I'm not talking about obscure acts that didn't change the course of history (such as the Z1 or the scanning disk).  I'm talking about deeds  of men such as the Wright brothers, Alexander Graham Bell, Bill Gates--men whose actions more than those of anyone else changed the world through things such as the airplane, telephone, and computer.

I repeat my challenge:  name me three things of the magnitude of the airplane, telephone, and computer that Europe "gave to the world during" the past century.  Face it, Europe is a "has been,"  not a "mover and shaker" like America.




-- Modified on 9/23/2010 10:23:49 AM

Kadjevic 5447 reads
posted
13 / 15

Posted By: Burt2010
I said “gave to the world” not invented.  The reason is there are too many debates over who invented what.  The truth is when inventions are made there are usually several people who independently at approximately the same time invent something similar.  Some fade into the dust bin of history while others go on to change the world.  

Take the discovery of the Americas.  People argue if the Vikings, Phoenicians, Chinese, etc.  “discovered” the Americas.  But it was Columbus who “gave the world” the knowledge of the Americas.  It was his voyages that changed the world.

Who invented the computer depends to a large degree on the definition of what is a computer.  It’s true that some consider the Z1 invented by  Conrad Zuse (a German) to be the first computer.  It’s also true that it was destroyed  by allied bombers in WWII and did not lead to the computers in common usage today.  (It was IBM, Apple, Microsoft—take your pick—that “gave to the world” the computers we use today.)

Paul Nipkow patented the scanning disk in 1884, but his invention didn’t lead to television as the world knows it.  It was Philo Farmsworth (an American) and RCA that in 1927 “gave to the world” what we know as television.   Henry Ford didn’t invent the piston engine, but he, more than anyone else, “gave to the world” automobiles as we know them today.  He also “gave to the world” the assembly line and thus manufacturing as world knows it.  Etc. Etc. Etc.

The point I was making above is that it is America—not Europe—that for the last century or more has lead the world in innovation, science and technology. In contrast Europe “gave the world” Facism, Nazism, Communism, two world wars and a colonial legacy (because of the way they drew lines on the map and failed to educate and train those in their colonial empires) is still creating problems today.  Viet Nam, Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait, the Pakistan-India conflict, etc. are  Europe’s legacy.  As I said before, what happens in Europe today does not shape the world—the world’s “mover and shaker” for the past century has been America.  

What Europe and Europeans do and think and teach is really of little or no consequence to the modern world.  The world’s “mover and shaker” for the past century has been America. The future probably belongs to China and India, but Europe’s place is in the dust bin of history.

As I said above, America “gave to the world” airplanes, pharmaceutical, telephones, computers, the Internet, etc.  I again challenge you to name me things of this magnitude that Europe “gave to the world.”  I'm not talking about obscure acts that didn't change the course of history (such as the Z1 or the scanning disk).  I'm talking about deeds  of men such as the Wright brothers, Alexander Graham Bell, Bill Gates--men whose actions more than those of anyone else changed the world through things such as the airplane, telephone, and computer.

I repeat my challenge:  name me three things of the magnitude of the airplane, telephone, and computer that Europe "gave to the world during" the past century.  Face it, Europe is a "has been,"  not a "mover and shaker" like America.




-- Modified on 9/23/2010 10:23:49 AM
Basically what this is is you throwing out the things developed in Europe, picking out the point where they were beginning to be developed in the US, and then stating that they "gave it to the world".  I can name countless things started in Europe, but your response will just be "Well, Europeans invented it, but it was really America who gave it to the world."  You'll be able to say that about anything.  You'd probably say that pizza, while Italian in origin, was really given to the world by America.

This is an argument of yours based off of your opinion, and not fact.  You can do this easily because you're playing with words.  You can repeat your challenge all you want, but I named three things that come from Europe that are in wide use today, and you simply come back with, "Well, it was invented in Europe, but that's not what I meant."  For instance, X-rays were pioneered by the Germans.  However, you're going to say "Well, the Germans invented it, but it was really America that 'gave it to the world'".

It's a ridiculous catch-all that you can use in any situation because it is simply your opinion.  I'll prove my point.  Here is a list of things invented in Europe.  I want everyone to see how ridiculous you are as you claim that America was the real reason they were brought about:

Oh, by the way, your Congress in 2002 took the recognition for the telephone from Alexander Graham Bell and gave it to an Italian man named Antonio Meucci.  But hey, America "gave it to the world" right?  Oh, and Alexander Graham Bell was Scottish, by the way, even though he did get a US patent.

Europeans invented the thermometer, the wrist watch, the microscope, CDs (compact discs), video tapes, the newspaper, LCDs, the telescope, the piano, artificial refrigeration, launched the first submarine, trains, the lawn mower, the light bulb (I know your schools teach you it was Thomas Edison, but it was actually Heinrich Goebel, from Germany.  Look it up.), the helicopter as well.  So go on and dismiss ALL of those as being invented in Europe but being "given to the world" by Americans so people can finally see how ridiculous you really are.

WymenLover 36 Reviews 5856 reads
posted
14 / 15

Burt: you have been here a long time and the atmosphere always seemed pleasant to me.

Why not just ignore this K-guy, who obviously has a lot of time on his hands.  Maybe if
he is ignored he'll take a long siesta.

Kadjevic 4485 reads
posted
15 / 15

Posted By: WymenLover
Burt: you have been here a long time and the atmosphere always seemed pleasant to me.

Why not just ignore this K-guy, who obviously has a lot of time on his hands.  Maybe if
he is ignored he'll take a long siesta.
Yes, ignoring posts will bring more traffic to the forums and promote discussion.  That's a great idea.  I've seen multiple posts about how forum activity has dropped, and this is your solution.  Pure genius, mate.

Register Now!