i find backpage to be comical and look at it strictly for comic relief...once in a while you see a classy lady advertising but that is rare...i particularly enjoyed this ad where said advertiser says she only takes 5 appointments a day...come on now...what's the point of even writing that...

Bonnie has also advertised bbfs and bb anal.  No thanks

I got lucky and had a great experience with a BP provider (Touring Tara) this weekend.  98% of the ads are kind of a joke but I check it out because many girls on BP are so close to me vs. the much longer BWI and DC trips.  Convenience does count for something.

On her website she lists bb as a "fetish" for an extra $150.  

Does this young lady he a death wish?

I don't have one  so that is an immediate turn off

Well...don't let her do you in the butt with her penis.  

You don't want to catch an std... But vaginal sex ain't that risky death wish wise for a man. Let's not act like girls ain't barebacking someone's outside of the hobby...my confidence level is high that a lot do so with a friend with benefits, or boyfriend.

If you can't understand the difference between BBing one or two significant people in your life, versus BBing anyone who'll give you an extra hundred bucks, you need to get out while you still can

Well as I'm not that far removed from college...lot of girls same age as these providers are on birth control and they ain't all got a steady boyfriend and could take or leave condoms as getting prego is the biggest worry.  

Anyways you hear from the guys on here that some girls offered them bbfs after seeing them for quite some time...and they decided to stop seeing her. Hence I'm sure a good amount of providers bbfs a couple of long term clients and replace as needed. Advertising for every Tom, Dick, & Harry...nope.  

But I'm addressing that its naive to think a couple of the guys that have reviewed a girl didn't bbfs no matter what they stated in a review yet alone maybe a couple of guys that are not big into reviews. Granted its not the same as advertising for everyone...but I'm confident some long term clients are getting bbfs from quite a few of the providers yall have seen/see.

Having sex recreationally and having sex for a living are two very different things. Many would say that having bareback sex with a significant other is considerably less risky than having bareback sex with clients.  The risk is still there in both situations, but the risk is probably more mitigated in the former situation rather than in the latter.

I also never understood the mindset that pregnancy was the biggest worry.  Pregnancy can be taken care of; some STIs are forever. It's so foreign and backwards to me. anyway..

 If you understand that, you'll understand the mindset of most providers.  Most providers don't offer bbfs to clients; some do, and that's their choice to do so.  Some people have to handle their business differently than others.  Everyone's limits are different.  

You could indeed be very right about those who offer bbfs services to long-term clients, and those clients have the option to stop seeing her or not.  But the chances that that client was actually exposed to anything during his time with her having protected fs? Pretty minimal, assuming the condom was used properly every time

 
yeah...cause college aged girls only have bbfs with their boyfriend in the land of hook-up culture, lol, hahaha! granted a several guys in college every year ain't 100s, but the risk would appear to be the same for the ones that offer bbfs to long-time clients as the ones that only bbfs in the civilian world.... except for providers that bbfs everyone.  

i mean damn...this game has a lot of 18-26yr olds that are supposedly going to college. To think some of the highly promiscuous girls on campus wouldn't become providers is naive. There are guys in college dicking down peoples favorite providers with no condom anyways...so that being the case then most of guys should not see many of these girls.  What's the difference between a couple of long-term clients and college kids barebacking the girl?...hobbyist are less pure

and here's the kicker...are not a lot of hobbyist classified as a significant other that is sleeping with other women? hahaha.  

whats the difference between a client and a significant other? blurred lines. Hell, a clients probably uses condoms with more women than a civvy.

I'm with you on clients and providers using protection more frequently than civilian populations, but your judgements about "purity" are way off base. I'm not sure why you've decided to pass judgements on the actions of others. If you're safe and using protection all the time with providers you see, there's no reason to worry about what they do when they aren't with you. Same goes for any civilian. If YOU are always protecting yourself, there's not much to be concerned with.  

Bottom line: as a provider, it's not any of my business what a client does concerning his health and protection when he's not with me. As a client, it's none of your business what a provider does concerning her health and protection when she's not with you. All any one client or provider can do is protect themselves as they see fit. My health and welfare are incredibly important to me, so I take all necessary precautions to ensure my health and welfare are protected.  Different people have different values, and it's not for me to judge someone based on their actions.

 
Fair points.

I'm just commenting on the reaction to bbfs in the hobby as opposed to the civilian world.  

 

Cause the reaction is when a girl offers a long term clients bbfs as i've heard/read a lot tend not to go back even though they were/will be using protection. I think the risk was always the same even when not being offered bbfs cause you don't know whats going on outside of the hobby. Hence....why cut a girl off instead keep playing if safe after you respectfully decline?...But the reaction is cut the girl off.  

And I'm just going based on my college experiences and being 26-32 aka not far removed....dudes is bare-baking and you got some girls getting trains ran on them in some cases.  I believe the risk has always been there from day one of seeing a lot of these girls....the only thing being different is a guy gets offered bbfs and has some kinds realization of risk and cuts them off completely, lol.  


-- Modified on 4/24/2014 12:12:29 PM

Honestly, I can see what you're talking about.  Why does a regular client all of a sudden drop a provider when she offers bbfs to him, instead of continuing to see the provider and using protection?

I'm not sure.  I feel like that offer might shock a lot of clients, especially if they've never asked for it.  The assumption would be that "if she offers it to me, she probably offers it to others".  It's not something that's special anymore, maybe? Knowing, pretty much fully, that she offers and gets paid for bbfs at all could be enough of a boner-killer for lots of clients. They might also assume that because she offers bbfs that she's "dirty".  

When you're dirty, you need a shower.  When you have STI, you need treatment, not a moral judgement.  

These guys are probably assuming some age-old "well, she's just another dirty hooker" crap.  Fact of the matter is, she's not "dirty".  She's got different limits. If she wants to offer that, that's her choice.  If he wants to accept or reject the offer, that's his choice.  

I would be hard-pressed to find anyone, civilian or otherwise, who has never had bareback sex. It happens.  Condom usage is always over-reported because people know they're supposed to be safe, but often aren't

Exactly.  

Some Providers are doing bareback in the civy world and its not exactly significant others...but long as its not in the hobby where guys would know the concern is not there, lol.  

A provider that barebacks a couple clients and is safe in the real world aka a signicant other.... is less risky than the party girl that only uses protection for work from the numbers alone, haha.  

Eom.