I have two issues with reviews lately.

I realize beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and high ratings creates high (sometimes unrealistic) expectations, but cmon, the consensus speaks for itself. When there a review is an outlier, you don't necessarily become suspicious, but you take a look at their credibility. From a review history standpoint, this reviewer gives high marks to a few that were graded middle of the pack. That's what lead me to be suspicious. (I won't state who or who was reviewed, but as a hint its a review of a girl formerly known as Roel.)

Second, what is up with all the 9's and 10's for the first 7-12 reviews, then a guaranteed slide in ratings. Service stays high, but appearance takes a dive. I think some of it has to do with fake reviews, a niceness factor for being an initial review, not wanting to bite the hand that feeds you, and expectations vs reality. But I there are obvious brownie points that are undeserved in the initial ratings.

Well off my soap box. I know, just live with it, but imagine how much better this site would be if these were resolved....

Some girls that I would not even think about hooking-up at bars even get 9/10's here . When I show up for those meetings, of course, I get disappointed. Too bad, I cannot just cut-and-run for a numerous reasons. I still end up enjoying the session somewhat if they have nice bodies. While being in the hobby, I have only seen two below averages. They had gorgeous bodies though. Oh well.

Some guys are getting afraid to give low numbers.  They might end up on a blacklist somewhere.  If putting down a 9 brings rewards then why not continue the behavior?

The reason bookers want to know your TER handle is so they can control who gets to play based on how you rate the girls.  So, in many cases, truth in ratings doesn't exist.  Some guys would give a 7 a 9 just to make sure they don't piss off the bookers.

We know the answer is to hide your TER handle, but if you did, you wouldn't pass the bookers screening.  So we're stuck.  There's no solution right now except to lower your expectations when you go to see a girl.

To be honest, there are plenty of girls out there.  If.a booker blacklists over a.stupid rating, then move on.  Not.workth the stress or.worry. Imo

K-dolls Or hobby are not  TER members and even more do not write reviews. If K-doll , in fact all working girls , were to limit themselves to seeing  TER members they would go out of business . Hobbyists come from all kind of socioeconomic backgrounds ethnicities ,and I am sure the majority  big spenders never post on the LA DB  or write reviews.

Some guys naively give their TER handle to the K-dolls and end up regretting it or using an alias.

Bookers are concerned any score below 7 will  be almost impossible to overcome, and the Doll ends up being farmed to  work elsewhere or returned home if she is unable to generate income. The problems lies with the reviers who overtime inlated score and to some extent to TER rating system which stipulates that scores are tied to the menu rather than the experience with all the variable and tangibles that are not measurable.  

The bookers monitor both the board and reviews very closely , the Dolls follow their reviews , recognize many of the reviewers and the fake reviews submitted by guys seeking free VIP membership.K-dolls who speak ,  read and understand English read the boards too.

Ultimately all providers seem to demand 9's  and 10's irrespective of the of the quality of the experience.

The rating system has been compromised and an alternative that is fair to the working girls and informative to the clients needs to be developed if the integrity of reviews is to be restored.

We are lucky to have such a great review system and such great providers.  And the review system contributes to the quality.  Many of you are probably too young to remember the days before reviews, when you'd walk into an amp and just hope there was someone younger than your grandmother.  There were no reviews and often had no idea what you'd find.   Back then, there WERE many 4s and 5s. By comparison any of our k-girls would be a 10.

As forwhy a girl's scores decline with time--there are many. In addition to those mentioned,  there is regression to the mean.  Providers with high revieew attract many customer s; someone will eventually be disatisfied. It makes someone like Lohan that more amazing--she can maintain those high scores for years
Rather than contantly dissing reviews/reviewers, we should enjoy the golden age of mongering we live in.

In the bad old days you were lucky if the sweet young thing on LA Exotics (anyone else remember that site?) didn't turn out to be a ROB or worse. When I read the reviews with all those 9s and 10s (written by reviewers who are sure they gave the lady multiple Os and who are sure she is really bi even though theyve never seen her anywhere near another lady I just shake my head. But if TER does little more than help to avoid being ripped off and give you some reality based idea of what you're getting it's still an infinite improvement over crossing your fingers.

If I have doubts I simply pm the reviewers and ask for their honest opinion.