So, there is a 10/9 review of Mink, a never before reviewed Asian gal. The Review is a rave, but the reviewer and reviewee are both first timers? What say you, TER Brain Trust? Yea or Nay? RT Dubious & out
I've been seeing a lot of that happening in my area, Tampa, FL, also. Wonder what is going on. Is that policy no longer in effect?
Swim
I never saw Mink but she was around several years ago and initially had some really good reviews - the photos are pretty hot. Then the reviews went downhill and she disappeared. She is now back advertising with pictures that make her look just as she did before, but now she advertises only massage. I was looking forward to seeing a new review, but I agree with you that this one from someone who has no other reviews is suspect, especially given Mink's prior history.
Let's give 32duden a break. Maybe he's been locked up in a monastery for years and this is the first gal he's ever seen. As such, de facto she is one in a lifetime(or a 10)for him. Sorry, I just had to do it. LOL Ciao!
http://orange-county-escorts.cityvibe.com/escorts/list/378882.htm
http://san-diego-escorts.cityvibe.com/escorts/list/378883.htm
... which usually consists of the bare minimum of verbage and alphabet soup. This was clear and flowed smoothly.
No judgements or endorsements here, just observations.
I agree the review is well written, cogent even.... However, I am just flabbergasted that a first time reviewer (who also knows enough to write such a cogent review) just happens to get a top 2% gal his first shot. I don't believe in coincidence or luck, that's all I am saying....
History will tell the tale....
RT
I've been watching to see if she would ever get reviewed. She seems TGTBT with such good pics and a rocking bod.
When I saw the review, I though the same thing. New reviewer and such terrific reviews.
I'm hoping a few more reviews will come. Not sure I want to TOFTT.
I am not defending the reviewer or White Knighting for Mink. Just that she has been around on and off for years. At one time she had pages of reviews and then had them pulled. I think she was planning on retiring but ended up coming back. She will go back to Asia for long periods of time and used to have a spectacular body. I recall her reviews did start to suffer from poor performance which I think we all who had seen her as regulars saw firsthand a personal decline due to some form of chemical abuse. At her peak she was a 10/10 IMHO. Mink is older, back then I suspected 40-something but stunning woman to look at and very well preserved.
She briefly resurfaced maybe two years ago with a new number as I used to have her old personal cell which was disconnected. An old mamasan type answered, right away knowing it was not her I asked to speak with Mink (but referred to one of her old provider names) and then said her real name. The mamasan asked who I was and some other questions trying to verify how I knew the real info. She said she would get back to me she did, Mink told her that she did not remember me and it would be only a FBSM. I passed. I used to get a seriously killer deal on multi hour appts and got the vibe that maybe that would be happening again. I think the pics in the ad are old by a few years at this point.
This may be her first review now, but from what I remember, she had pages and pages of solid reviews, but used to travel back to Asia and disappear for long periods of time. She had a rocking body for a late 30-something.
So numbers might only be slightly inflated in proximity to how quickly he wrote review after his visit.
Rick2
An arguably dubious review gets questioned. Rational, reasoned analysis follows. Doc G chimes in with a cautious and logical comment. Others provide info and reflection.... Et, viola! We have a much better understanding of the various explanations. Not perfect, of course, but a wonderful discussion. If the original reviewer would chime in, it would really add to it...but of course, he is free to remain silent.... RT Pleased & Out
I saw her 8-9 times back in her heyday. Last time was around xmas 2005. I think there's a good chance the pics are recent. Her body was tight and toned back then and I wouldn't doubt it still is. I'd say the boob job was a little (or maybe a lot) over done, but they were probably the main drawing point for many. She was quirky to say the least. Don't know her status now, but she was indie back then. Think it was my first visit when she answered the phone while she was on her knees servicing me. Another time she handed me her phone and a notepad after our session was over and had me check her messages and write down the guys name and number. Some guys might find that off-putting. I thought it was a hoot.
very nice time, check my reviews.
As stated above, her old reviews were pulled. I wrote one as well. You can call up the review up from your own account, but when the public checks your list of reviews, Mink/aka Jade will not be among those available for them to view.
I checked your reviews -- I couldn't find Mink. Was it removed by TER?
This is a mystery. I saw this new review and it talks about full service but the ad is for massage only. First of all, I did see her about a month ago. She had the same ad up for sensual massage and the pics drew me in. I drove out to the Miracle Mile area for an incall - it was just a massage w/hj. That is all that was offered. She wasn't bad looking, but the pics were really misrepresentative but I didn't complain, she seemed to be a nice woman. She was tall, in great shape but probably in her 40s, Asian women have such great skin. I believe she was from Taiwan. The session was OK, not the best, not the worst, I kept her number on my phone because she said she'd come out to my house for the same rate and worked real late (like until 3AM).
So I saw her ad a couple of days ago and I thought, I'd give her another shot. So I texted the number I had in my phone. It bounced back. The number I had was no longer in service. The number on the new ad on CV was different. I sent her a text, no reply -- I did remind her who I was and that I had seen her before.
I personally think the review is dubious. Doesn't make sense it's for FS when the ad is for massage. I have her email from before so I will send her a ping to see if she replies.
I'm thinking back in my murky past and I do recall ANOTHER Mink. I think this is the "original" one some of you guys have been talking about having seen, she was quite bodacious, very busty, super great shape, tan, a total hard body. Yes? The first time I saw her she was actually working at an AMP which used to be next to the Pacific Dining Car restaurant on Wilshire and Princeton. Then she went solo.
The Mink I saw recently was NOT the same Mink. She was much taller than the original Mink, very fair skin, quite thin, with bolt-ons.
So the issue now is, is the ad for the original Mink or for the new Mink that I saw last month?
The Mink that I used to see is the one in the pics. That is why I said the photos are old, she used to model or least pay for tons of professional photography. I think she did some minor legit modeling for bikini and lingerie. I want to say with a 100 percent certainty that I remember seeing the three pics in her ad from her old portfolio. Does anyone else recall how she had photos of herself all over the incall and even a few posters she would show if asked?
The Mink that I knew went by many names was a tall lean woman with fantastic implants and flawless skin. She was very weird most of the time and others just wanted to fuck. More than once we would do laundry, walk her dog and nap between fucks. If she was comfortable with you, a whole afternoon would go by.
Also she is listed under escorts on City Vibe in addition to massage. I first saw the ad appear maybe 4-6 weeks ago.
It is a legit review. I have been inactive from TER for several years and could not reactivate my old name. Have been seeing Mink for years and she asked that I review her since she decided to get back in the game. Pictures are recent and yes she can be as quirky as ever, but when you gain her confidence the service and experience is second to none.
That is great that you took the time out to reply. I still think the pics were taken sometime ago but she must still look stunning as ever. She must have made a deal with the devil.
Thanks a lot for your reply.
I have been following this thread and I'm glad to see where it wound up. Mink is a classic. She is older, but so am I. I haven't seen her for a few years, but she is beautiful. I can easily believe she has a body today that is far better than mine. She may do laundry during your session, but she'll fuck you royally in her spare time which is what we all want. She is a classic - a quirky classic - but a classic!
I'm still confused/unconvinced.
I did hear back from the Mink I saw last month who just provided massage. When I saw her, he just did not seem overly sexual, in fact, the HJ was pretty mechanical. She seemed quite nervous to me, not a natural sexy creature. Now I'm really curious. I'll get a hold of her and see if she offers more than just the sensual massage to me. And as in my previous post, I do recall a completely different Mink who was a real hardbody but it's been over 10 years and I don't think its the same one that I saw recently. The height and shape are different. But 32duden sounds legit so hence my confusion.
We need a 3rd party to confirm! Any takers??
It's pretty simple. If the Mink you saw recently has a pair of huge, more or less rock hard DD's, then she's the girl in the current pics - the classic Mink. I haven't seen her in 5 years, but there is no doubt those are the classic's pics. If the lady you saw didn't have huge boobs, then it's not the classic Mink.
Well, I guess its the real Mink then because she has big hard d cups. But other asian women can have big d cups.