I consider most unethical and rather predatory   for a John to threaten a provider with bad review if she does surrender to his unreasonable demands, I know this is a very common complaint of blackmail is common among newbie 90-day wonder , whose English is limited , who want to please and cannot afford to have a bad review. 

On the other side of the coin is providers who ask clients to give review them and give them a score of 10 & 10 irrespective of their performance ,attitude and service they offer. It is unethical for a provider to engage in such a conversation with a client and once this becomes public it puts the credibility of the said provider's reviews in doubt.

I recently came across these two reviews of Nicole Page in which both reviewers allege  that she asked them for 10, 10 scores. If their claim is true it makes all of NP's reviews worthless  and her reviewers reputation tainted.

HIHOSTEVERINO'S REVIEW OF NICOLE PAGE

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1261317

PUNTER69'S REVIEW OF NICOLE PAGE

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1264410

harpman, kudos to you for having the balls to write this post. You and I are kindred spirits...see link below..

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewall.asp?MessageID=65732&boardID=7&page=1#65732

I set up an appointment with her, got to the door and walked out!!!  She and her BH apartment smelled like smoke/ashtray and I could not handle it.  She was like a 7 in looks.  I got south shot from her and the dumbass' on the boards to take down the review (which I did).  That's why I stick with the same providers or get a referral from a provider or friend in the hobby.  I don't trust a lot of these reviews.  They reflect 10s and they then out to be 5s on my scale. Some of these guys HAVE to pay to get laid so they OVER rare these women because their standards are...well, they don't have any standards.

She asked me to do the same!

Or is it a lot more common than we know?

Did u?

Offer an extra half hour for a 10/10 review, or see the client at a discounted rate for a 10/10!

wtf I have been doing this for a long time & just got my 1st 10/10 review, which I worked very hard for, so how does TER allow the new providers to reach the top 100 list by being unethical?

1 of the same providers in SD who does this also, uses fake photos to get the dates.  Hard business!

-- Modified on 7/25/2012 8:25:49 AM

I was going to write a review for Nicole Tryst, and at the same time asked her if she could white list me.  Her response was that she would only white list me if I gave her a great review.  I told her that I thought it was unethical to base one on the other.  After all, isn't white listing a means of keeping this industry safe, particularly for providers?  Well, I felt that my review would be tainted, so I opted not to write one.  If anyone cares to know about the specifics, I'll gladly respond to a pm, but feel that this isn't the venue to critique her looks or performance either.

Ok here is the deal.  Everyone has standards.  Well some of us do.  For GODs sake I know guys that will fuck a women that is 400lbs.   I have standards and the trick to this hobby is to find someone that has the same type of taste or standards and get referrals from them or from different providers.   Before I see a girl I see who they have seen and then I review who they saw and how they rated the girls.  Then I send them a Private message to get the REAL scoop on the girls.  Most of the time guys will tell you the real truth about them over PM because your are scared of the providers getting pissed at them.  Dude!  We are paying these fucking girls.  Come on!!!  It's a SERVICE. People tend to lose sight of that.

an alias any more than each of our official handles/ screen names is alias. The two reviews I cited are not written by aliases and the reviewers have at least as much credibility as you and given how many reviewers fear the backlash that legitimate negative reviews generate, I submit that they should be commended for having the courage to express their true experience. If only more were like them.

You can only speak for yourself and your experiences  and it is expected that you would stand by your review.

The LA Discussion board is the right place for this post because the provider, the reviews and the appointments took place in LA and the reviews of the provider and by the reviewers are available on LA Board. However, be my guest , if you wish to start a national discussion on the reviewers board ,I am sure the provider would love you for questioning her professional  integrity and work practices nationally, instead , of limiting them to a local board. Still , maybe someone else  will take you up on your suggestion and post this on the Reviewers Board.

I more than anyone else , other than perhaps B310, have opposed aliases but I don't remember you criticizing them before and have no idea if you hide behind the skirt of an alias , when it suits you or not.

Please stick to the topic and don't interject red herring in an attempt to hijack the the thread.  

I agree with you on the unreliability of the score. I find half of the top 10 would score 6 or less on my own personal scale. I often wonder if my standard is really that different than everyone else's or the scores are not a true reflection of the reality. If the scores are not accurate then there's a high probability that the details of the reviews are inaccurate as well.  I have come to the conclusion that I can not rely solely on scores & reviews to select who I would like to see. However, scores & reviews does help me to know if the provider is legit (not LE) and is not in possible trouble and is still active. I try not see anyone with less than 5 reviews and anyone with review that's over 1 year old. It's too easy for LE to set up someone with 1 or 2 reviews. Anyone who is not getting any reviews for over 1 year may be a sign of personal trouble (it could be in many different forms) or may have retired. I would not trust a referral from a provider because of conflict of interest. Why would she recommend someone who is prettier and better than she is? I am still too new at this hobby so I don't have any friend yet so I have to depend on myself.

It's true that I don't get free sex at this time (too complicated for me), but that doesn't mean I have no standard. Are you sure your standard is higher just because you are getting lay for free? I have found that I would be more willing to compromise on quality if I am getting something for free.

I just did a google image search on her photos.

Smart to advise the PM for additional info.  All should use this feature

Just because it is a "common request" does it make it right?

Its sad but thats why I stopped writing  true reviews because they dont get approved  because they are way lower then the girl previous  scores .  So I dont bother writing reviews to offend the girls that have a big ego that think the guys are assholes cause he doesnt think Im beautiful. Some of the guys that review a  girl have never been layed in there life so anything with 2 legs is a 10 . Ive said it before and ILL say it again .If I offend any girls Im sorry .There are no Playboy  Models in this buisness or else they wouldnt be doing this or they would be on a cover of a magazine . .There could be a rare gem but a 10 is liking finding a needle in a haystack . Ive noticed one girl that Ive wanted to see that has nothing but perfect 10 scores but half of her reviews are from  guys that have only that review and she charges way above the price . I once saw a girl that had all perfect 10 scores and in my book she was a 5 and I left .

by Carlhungus in which he parodies LA Discussion Board's resident  narcissist  and fake reviewer, pretty funny don't you think.

I will try respond to your other post on this thread with a more serious aspect.  

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1248495

It struck me as more of a Reviewers board item, but doesn't matter much.

I think it absolutely wrong for anyone in any industry to ask for high marks in a survey or a review.  It's a real turn off for me.  The guy who sold me my car, said to give favorable answers when I did the J.D. Power survey. In the end I had a bad experience with the dealership, so fuck that noise.  It's okay to be reminded to take the survey, but do not tell me how to answer it.  It's about as ethical as the sellers filling out the survey themselves.

Thank you for sharing this because some of us limit ourselves to our local boards . Appreciate you took the time and made the effort to address a serious issue.

It happened to me on every single Lexus that I purchased, but I am still happy with my Lexus. Regardless of what the dealership did, it's still a good car.

I wish you stayed on sidelines. Until the moderators outed your allied  you used your handle and your allias to respond and support each others' posts. You even used both to gang up on me ( check link below) .
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=276473&boardID=1&page=#276473

It tells volume about you if you pulled your review of NP because of " pressure" from others , what about the cost to your credibility once your actions suggest your review might be fake.

You have been accused of fake reviews by providers and judging by some of you reviews of K-dolls I would not challenge these allegations. It is very easy to post a fake review of a K-doll ( especially if it's a positive review) since the K-dolls are not in the habit of responding.

You say you are a changed person but your reviews do not suggest rehabilitation

I would like to PM you about Nicole Tryst but can't PM an alias?

I would like to hear what Nicole has to say about all this!

You gave Sarah Jessie 10 for Appearance. I don't even find her attractive, but I would rate her a 8 if I am writing her review. The reason is that I know many people would find her attractive. It's not a matter of standard. It's just different people have different taste or preference.

they are not linked to values and ethics or  if the person has no integrity or self respect and lacks the character to defend his convictions.

It is ok to boast and feed ones ego , unless that is the are no foundations to support the claims.

These "scores" have been a MAJOR bone of contention since TER went on-line in 2000!

 Early on; statistician, actuary, and fellow hobbyist "Mathesar" created a TOP 100 "Mathesar Report" in LA. By its second cyber publication Hooking had become a blood-sport amongst the top twenty rated providers in LA. The anointed at the top were regularly engaging in every form of clandestine bullying, extortion, and of course COLLUSION between friends, boy friends, SO's, hubbies, active and noted hobbyists, as well as an Administrator and his minions. Within a year there were MANY TER members pleading to end the "Mathesar Report" and the madness caused by it. But with 3 or more of the TOP Ten providers now being Mathesars pro-bono ATF's and a small legion of SO's, minions etc also profiting it would take until Mathesar was too old & sick to stop publishing it.

 NOW we have a automated TOP 100, and many of the venal human elements have been removed; but it is still far from controversy free.

I've never found much wrong with the "performance" scores and their precepts; but the "Appearance" system breeds nothing but contempt from both sides.

Simple answer?  Change "Appearance" 1 - 10 to "Photo fidelity" 1-10

1. Not the woman in the photos

2. Far from the truth

3. 10 years & 25+ pounds ago maybe

4. Face/eyes obscured & body doesn’t match

5. Face/eyes obscured but body matches

6. Total Glamour shots using all the tricks

7. Glamorized but realistic

8. Artfully posed but representative

9. Very fair representation

10. What you see is totally what you get

 Too bugger up the computer's (or human's) ability for "Value added" simply substitute #5 description for #10 description, #8 for #3, #6 for #9 etc etc.

Which is morally, ethically worse; a provider asking for 10-10's, or a provider influencing someone to write a less than honest/flattering review about another provider?

I agree 100%

I wouldn't post anything if there's no alias. I feel I need it for my personal safety. There's no way for me to know there isn't a nut job out there somewhere who may be able to track me down if I offended him/her somehow. I know it still doesn't completely protect me, but it's better than nothing. Do you know how easy it is to crack a site like TER if you really want to? It's just my 2c.

did she contact you after your review was posted?  

There is a Independent asian girl who does the same thing! Her name starts with a " A ".
Claims to be a sexy asian. But, more like a Thick asian after you see her!

Here you go.

Unless necessary I try to avoid mentioning her by name. Anyway you took  the thunder out of  what was going to be my next OP , I will have to think of something else. Every hippo has it's day

She is B310 project so I will only say Karma is indeed a bitch.

.

I wouldn't suggest that your car or mine is a bad car to drive because of the way the dealer behaved.  I don't like my car any less.  But, I'd never go back to where I bought my car. Not because they asked me to rate them high in the survey, but other things they did.  They are gone now, so maybe there's a reason why.  I am glad I didn't fill out the survey right away.

I am sure that your name will now appear on the NBL...hahahahaha..Sorry buddy but welcome to the "Asian A" Club to be blacklisted because you called her out on her crap.


Be prepared for the backlash from her "supporters". I can hear it already...blah blah blah blah...


But yes indeedy Karma is a bitch..isnt that right "A"?  


toodles...


Beemer looking for a "Sexy Asian A"

Did not review and provide her what she yearns for. I would check ten national black list , whose value has been compromised by misuse and abuse by irresponsible, unethical out of control providers.

and HE asked me for a good scoring when his bosses did a follow-up to his service visit.

I've been solicited in this manner by everyone from hotel maids to attorneys in this world of "Angie's List" I dunno what your fuss is about.

 I've seen Nicole several times since my 9 - 9 review. Between her knowing just how to dress for me, and her happily accommodating certain favorite predilections of mine; an updated review would only reflect a better scoring.  

Harpman60 with all due respect you are a dumbass. All reviews are subjective. Nothing more. Otherwise you would believe every delusional f#$%^ that believes that they are god's gift to woman and they perform better then a porn actor or that they are member of a superior race for f#$%ing for 10 hours straight. Reviews are nothing more then to gauge the providers attitude, friendliness, atmosphere, skills, etc.
Yes, if you look I did give her a ten and to me she deserves a 20! That is my opinion of her. Take it or leave it. It is up to you to decide to see her.
For you to question the integrity of the reviewers, compare to what? yours? What everyone have to ask themselves is: What is Harpman60 motive and what does he benefit by creating this thread? integrity? to benefit the community as if he is a good samaritan? or an ulterior motive:

ul·te·ri·or  (l-tîr-r)
adj.
1.  Lying beyond what is evident, revealed, or avowed, especially being concealed intentionally so as to deceive: an ulterior motive.
2.  Lying beyond or outside the area of immediate interest.
3.  Occurring later; subsequent.

other than suggest you ask yourself what ulterior motives you have for such a response & may I add I do not ask reviewers to grade me a 10, I do not badger reviewers who do not submit to my demands nor do I  ask for my negative reviews to be removed.

Furthermore , there  is a whole lot of difference between a client posting a review that reflects his genuine experience and a provider corrupting the review process by asking for high scores , deserved or not, and thus  undermining  the integrity of the reviews. And FYI reviews is the greatest asset of TER is the reviews  , that is why reviewers are rewarded with VIP status for reviews. If  reviews  are suspect or tainted they become redundant  and ultimately it would effect membership. Hobbyist rely on read  before deciding how to parting with with their hard earned cash .    

OK, so here I am, no alias (I've never had or used one), a 10/10 reviewer of Nicole.  I stand by EVERY review I've ever posted, all hundred+ of them, including the one for Nicole.  I think she's absolutely beautiful and provides an intimate, sexy and top of the line experience.  At least, that's been my experience with her each and every time; each experience has been like with any GF- we talk, fool around, argue and then have mad passionate make up sex!  I've always stayed longer than our appointment time and she has NEVER asked nor expected extra donation from me.  But, YMMV.
As for whether or not she asks her clients for scores, well, who cares?  The problem is the idiot who gives the perfect score when he doesn't really believe it!  Another poster said his cable repairman asked for perfect scores, so do my car mechanics for their reviews.  Who cares what they ask for, WE control OUR scores and should post only honest scores here.  And those who don't are the ones who screw it up for us.  I do agree that scores are subjective to the reviewer which is why I always look at the reviewers other scores to see if we have the same opinions when deciding whether or not I should trust them.  So, stop hating on Nicole already and take responsibility for your own scores!

I believe integrity and honesty are expected by most hobbyists here on the board. In my review, I didn't mean Nicole was a bad provider. IMHO, she just did not deserve to be among those top ones with 10/10 scores. I admit those scores are subjective, however, with most 10/10 scores, I guess everyone would expect sth outstanding. But from my experience, it was not. Whether it's subjective or not, I can't trust those 10/10 scores anymore.

I do apologize for my opening statement. I should have written: Harpman60 with all due respect you are wrong but instead I was led my emotions of what you are doing to Nicole Page. I still do not understand what is your motivation for creating this thread? It is to warn the community or because she pissed you off in some fashion? What is to gain of it? Is it the same as saying: hey watch out for Jane Doe because she is a swindler, con-artist, spinner that will rob you blind. Again I have to question yours or anybodies motivation because I do not buy it that you care that deeply for the integrity of the reviews. What is the benefit other then your self serving ulterior motive!

There's a good reason a lot of the top providers won't see you.

I agree.  I have any given a 10/ 10 like once.  Let's face it, most these women are NOT super models. They are hot but not that caliber.  Agree?  Disagree?  Either way it's VERY subjective.  That's why I tend to PM people that have seen these ladies and ask more questions.  I like thin/ skinny blondes and others ghat like chubby Asians.  Whatever your click or fansy just be open and honest when we PM you

I could have asked did you write your post on your own accord or were you directed by Nicole Page to step forward and defend her. We can forever question each others' motives but what will that prove.

However,  your review should be read in the spirit it was written why shouldn't my post be accepted or rejected on face value without interjecting anything that only  sidetracks the issue and hijacks the thread.

I have no vested interest in the fate , failure of Nocole Page, we have inner communicated or even responded to each others' posts,  she has done absolutely  nothing to please or piss me off and I have nothing personal against her. I have never tried to contact her and as a matter of fact even after this post I have no idea what she even looks like.

If you noticed I attempted to marginalize Fidcuof's posts on the thread because of his  documented lack of integrity and questionable credibility and for attempting to use the thread to apparently settle a personal score or vendetta with Nicole Page and her supporter and to falsely feed his ego at the expense of others. 
 
The issue at hand in not whether ratings are subjective or not that is a given . The issue is whether or not providers should  influence the score she receives by exerting undue influence over a client , and if that is the case what is the value of the said reviews,on a review site? While this practice is widespread  it is nevertheless unethical , high score should be earned and not demanded otherwise the are meaningless and even the legitimately high score become tarnished because of the providers actions. 

Reviews in a site like this are based on honor and trust. Unless one believes that the reviewer has actually seen the provider and that the review is an honest , beit subjective, reflection of the experience the reviewer had the whole review system becomes as irrelevant as it is redundant. 

I have no axe to grind with Nicole Page, it is only by coincidence that I came across her reviews. I simply used the two reviews as examples of a widespread problem that needs discussing.

You may not have  read my posts however , if you have , you will know that have an issue with fake reviews , reviews written by the proxies of bookers agencies and providers, reviews written in retaliation and I have stated I rely on reviews by a few trusted bros and recommendations by reelable reputable bookers.  
      

Joe, I agree with you. I have seen Nicole multiple times (more than 3) and she is one of the nicest provider that I have seen. All reviews are subjective and if there is no connection with the women you see then the rating will reflect the entire experience. This entire thread is highly vindictive and unnecessary to try to hurt Nicole Page.

I guess you don't read the discussion board very often.  This is one of the wat he rolls.  There are a number of non-Korean providers that are on his bash list.  N.P. is probably one of them.  It's generally a case where the lady has posted something on the board that he finds offensive to K-girls and he comes after them - over and over.  Of course I could be wrong.  Maybe he just stumbled across these reviews by accident and felt everybody on the board needed to know.

Snitches who carries K-bookers water on this board. Don't make accusations and slanderous statements because after being exposed for what  you are  you feel the need to settle a score.

Unlike you I do not hide behind the skirt of an alias but use my only handle to respond to those who express racist tendencies or a misogynist attitude or bash those who can not respond back,   irrespective of whether the culprit are paper clowns like you or blatant racist , whether they are johns  or working girls. Beside sitting on the sideline like UBL little boy tossing  grenades and bombs steep forward and reveal  your values and principles if you have any.

For once be a man and instead of trying to lower the discussion to your level address the issue which in this case has to do with providers undermining the integrity of reviews . If you have nothing to contribute try not to get your cheep thrill without once again proving how morally bankrupt you really are.  

why don't you produce the links where I bash any provider independent or otherwise which is not a response to a racist , demeaning or offensive post by her.why don't you support your false accusations with evidence and facts. You have been involved in many of threads so it should be easy to provide the evidence.

Instead of acting as the watch dog and censor in chief, on behalf of those whose water you carry, deciding  what is appropriate to post do yourself a favor and get a life , go out and have some fun if you know how to.  

This is an important topic, worthy of comment from all corners.  And, to a limited extent, the back and forth has been on point.  Sadly, like nearly all of the threads on this board, however, a significant percentage of the content has been devoted to personal attacks divorced from the topic.  We don't need to bitch at Harpman because of his patronage of K-girls.  Harpman, we don't need your personal diatribes at Fiducof and his sneaky past.  And to the other snarky posters, just cut it out please.  I agree that it is important to call out providers who corrupt review integrity, and I think it worth noting that the offending party has not chimed it.  But it is a waste of everyone's time to prattle on about how somebody has cooties and so we should or shouldn't pay attention to them.  Enough, please.

Don't make presumptions when the facts are underneath you nose. Feel free to express your support for ten providers but not at ten expense of the evevidence and toners. You can have your own opinion but not your facts. You are free to share your experiences but don't deny others the same right you wish to exercise.

You have two reviews alleging that Nicole Page asked them to rate her a 10 in their reviews . Are you disputing their claim and on what basis.

Do you think that it is ok for  providers should make demands that undermine the integrity of the review system ?

You make some pretty big ASSumptions once again and then you back off with your tail between your legs with the last half of your post???? Seriously huh?

You might as well should have just apologized and just kept your mouth shut...

RPD, seriously..were you just feeling lonely?

I think most guys are the same.  We could care less about who is popular and look for the looks and service we like at the price we can afford.

Its akward when a provider pleadingly asks for a 10/10 review.  I get asked when they can tell that i've had a fantastic time.  My response is always, I will write a great review for you.  No offense to the 10/10 guys, but usually that makes me less likely to want to see a girl.  I have to waste more of my time checking up the reviewer, their reviews to get a better feel for trusting them.

When I see a 10/10 I question what the ulterior motive is; true, I write reviews of my good times to help a provider get business, and to help keep a girl around that I would want to see again.

I dont think there is anything wrong for a girl to ask if you'd give her a good review, but asking for a 10/10 makes me think she's missing the point of what a review is all about.

spot on , we should focus on the issue and while I did not appreciate fidcuof making it about himself , especially with his own history, my effort should have been put in keeping all on topic.

As one poster mentioned, there is a certain asian provider that does
this as well. She wrote up a post in which she complained that a
couple of negative (read: accurate)..reviews were fake and started
asking for "support" in getting it removed. Someone called her out on
it and she promptly went apeshit. I use her as an example because it
is not about wether a provider is Asian or non Asian, it is about
PROFESSIONALISM and the lack of it by some providers of all types.

Hobbyists are not off the hook either. Whats the point of reviews then
if a 10 was given because the provider asked for it? You might as well
have just had her write the review. Then, there are those hobbyists
who pressure girls into doing things they dont need to in order to get
a good review..Trust me on this as I am sure many other hobbyists have
heard from other providers about this. Deplorable..

It is a two way street and I don't need to preach about it because we
are all big boys and girls.

I agree that there does need to be a systematic change in the way TER
does it's scoring because it is not fair to the ladies in demanding
too high a set of standards and too easily corrupted by different
aspects of what beauty is about.

Do those that rated N.P. 10's keep returning to see her? Once in a
lifetime is just that isnt it? I find it funny when I see a review
that has ONCE IN A LIFETIME in it but then the reviewer promptly adds
in his review, 'I can't wait to see her again..etc..etc.etc...."..

One other poster..(RPD) makes the claim that the OP is "bashing"
non-koreans by asking about the integrity of Nicole page's reviews, I
found it funny that this same poster (RPD) didnt call out a real bigot
(BPS) in his earlier threads / posts in which he purposefully started
demeaning a certain racial group in the hobby by calling them
derogatory terms. PURPOSEFULLY. Why the hypocritical stance?
oh..forgot...you are a hypocrite....sorry.


I agree that the topic at hand is a great topic and should be addressed.



Beemer asking for 10's because all he has are 20's.....

We have had a similar discussion on the SD boards ,please Check it  out .It's about time we stand up to false ,fake or unfair reviews more hobbyists need to out both the ladies and hobbyists

You are concerned about the "integrity" of the system? Seriously?
You are talking about guys reviewing escorts, some of whom are whack jobs; others of whom are morons; others of whom are vicious and cruel.

Integrity? Give me a fucking break already.

Your post this thread because you actually think that guys are pressured into writing positive reviews if an escort asks us to do so?

That is absurd.

Who gives a damn what the escort asks about rating her highly?
If she deserves it, and wants to be reviewed, why the hell shouldnt she ask to be given high reviews? What the hell is wrong with that?

There is no pressure to do anything, just because an escort asks it.
You can do it or not do it, however you please.
But if she wants to be reviewed it is perfectly proper for her to ask. Why the hell shouldnt she?
And if she thinks she deserves high numbers, then good for her.

There is far more pressure in your endless implications that your precious "k-girl" community bans people who dont give positive reviews.

The question of your motive is a good one. To me, it is obvious.
Your motive is to attack anyone and anything that does not go along with invoking your $250/hr k-girl world as the greatest thing ever created.
If you can find a way to besmirch anything or anyone that does not jump on board with you, you are more than happy to do it if you think that will give you an edge to promote the k-girls you endlessly pimp.

I forgot to respond to the medal post.  I'll go with:  Mercedes for the gold, Kia the silver, and Hundyi the bronze.

You mean get a life you - incessantly posting on a fuck board, researching ancient threads, sombing through guys reviews so I can accuse them of something nefarious? Sounds like fun to me.  You're right, maybe I should try that.

Nobody's calling me a K-girl pimp, so I guess I'm not carrying that water very well.  And those bookers just l  ove me for my reviews.  I just wrote one, ahh what year or two ago.  And I bring their attention to all this stuff on the board because I fail to pay attention to the posts of a couple of K-experts that have frequently stated how the girls and the bookers are paying close attention to all the reviews and discussion board posts.  But hey, if you can't be logical, you can always go the Joe McCarthy route.

And I do need correct one misrepresentation I made on a post.  On those occassions when I get the special rate for carrying the booker water, it's not always $2.50.  Their a couple in the upper tier where it's $2.70.

way or another. I do care about the reviews being honest and not dictated or written by providers or fakers who want free VIP days. You seem to be oblivious to the issue otherwise would not ask such a dumb question. No wonder you are too ashamed to use your screen name handle. What kind of compensation are you getting for your post.

I have no idea who Nicole is or what she looks like but I was disgusted by what I read in the two reviews I cited.

Nuff time wasted on you than you are worth. Sorry no biscuits or chocolate .