Since there is a huge problem with a website no reviews can be posted if that is the only site a provider has so this seems to really limit reviews of a good number of providers. Why is it that you can't just post a review without a provider link, just asking what I think is a reasonable question.

-- Modified on 12/18/2012 8:05:08 PM

I had the same thought long before the other website problem.  Saw a girl with several reviews, but when I was ready to post the review, it was denied since there was no active link. I exchanged a few messages arguing my side, but to no avail.  Different situation, but the same outcome.

And, with the many links being removed from many profiles, it is making TER less useful in terms of viewing ads quickly and easily.  

-- Modified on 12/18/2012 10:04:33 PM

...you have to remember why TER was set up in the first place - to provide the hobbyist with the most information possible to make a good decision about who to see.  Stats and reviews are important but you still need an ad or a website to get a feel for the provider.  Men are visual creatures; you can't just post a link to an LAXpress ad.

Without an ad link, you're just getting a pig in a poke and you might end up poking a pig.

To get around that issue - i just put none in the ad space . . .

Just post the review and for the link put
REPORT NEW WEBSITE  
That was accepted by TER

the longer it'll take the more people will leave

How am I go to be informed on 95% of the best providers out there if there's this cold war going on?

Just look up the provider's name on a TER search and you will
still find it if she had been reviewed before the war.

the form finally got accepted for review, but it was disqualified.