Write Review
2,074,677 Total Reviews 3,709 New Reviews
8,482 Users Online

Los Angeles

Thanks, Ashley.
swimtrekr 59 Reviews 393 reads
posted

No way you should be ranked that low, except it looks like ranking was done by number or reviews, with no regard for hobbyist ratings.

Swim

-- Modified on 7/1/2010 5:15:28 PM

swimtrekr907 reads

Even though I'm not from LA, I'd like to see it.

Swim

ReplyQuoteReport
Ljoe857 reads

I agree - I'd like to see it also.

ReplyQuoteReport
ashleyshye806 reads

Look under my past topic from last week when I posted "Lets Go Green"

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=243888&boardID=1

Related Link: http://beta.theeroticreview.com/reviews/topProviders.asp?city=1

ReplyQuoteReport
swimtrekr394 reads

No way you should be ranked that low, except it looks like ranking was done by number or reviews, with no regard for hobbyist ratings.

Swim

-- Modified on 7/1/2010 5:15:28 PM

ReplyQuoteReport
beautifulmind68517 reads

As such it indicate which providers get a high number of reviews...
Now how Mathesar has indicated this ranking is severly flaked because:
1) Reviews are not randomly generated, so there is statistical bias since the population, meaning the reviewers, is not random;
2) High number of reviews can only be a measure of 'popularity' nothing more, actually a measure of 'quantity' not necessarily the best indicator, since high volume does not translate in high quality of service...

What it might be interesting to do in this regard is to take those numbers from the 100 top provider and construct an INDEX by working through the rating and the number of reviews...index like the one generated in the stock market or the house market...
A single statistal number in form of a single index can be useful to grasp, quantity and quality of service in a provider...
BM

PS: With that Index Ashley will easily on the top 5 provider in the LA areas, no question about...

ReplyQuoteReport
Generalisimo858 reads

I have seen this happen on other sites, some providers will use the ranking for marketing (Good) and to justify fee increases (Bad). They may not comprehend the list has no true meaning and how those of us who have a more discriminating taste do not want to see high volume providers. Well most of the time.

ReplyQuoteReport
rpd1952517 reads

I think some of that premium being paid for lower volume ladies is not necessarily because they are more attractive or provide better service.  Seems to be pretty much accepted that review numbers are inflated in general.  You can't convince me that there's not going an additional inflation factor related directly to the level of the donation.

ReplyQuoteReport
Jennyinthevalley765 reads

Ouch Generalisimo, that hurt! Just teasing. Love you!

ReplyQuoteReport
zorbaelgreeko722 reads

Pages and pages of reviews is a definite turn off for me. I prefer low volume (maybe even if they are a little higher in price).

The last girl I saw on that list had me wait outside her apt. for 15 minutes while "she finished off her client before me".  I should have just turned around and said "no thank you". I think all us guys want to feel "special" in some way, and knowing that we are just part of a production line, kinda takes away from the experience.Well, it did for me.

Of course I am biased after my experiences with Ashley :)

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!