I've been checking out this provider on cityvibe, has only one review, so I dunno if it's legit.
any info would be appreciated
Looks legit to me.
Balboa
First of all, one of her pics is fake (the bottom one of her CV ad)...then if you do some extra search on her phone you will get several previous names, which pics are also fake...
Moreover, the reviewer who visited LA, wrote 3 reviews of ladies all coming from Eros...well, he seems no have idea that the lady he review under the name Lana has fake pics which are steal from internet model Alena Hemcova...
I cannot post all the links supporting my inferences because there are too many...I'm just pointing out some reasons that raised doubt about the idea that she will be the person you are going to meet. Lately the amount of fake reviews as increased so much that before putting on the table 800 Benja we should take extra care on doing accurate criss-cross research.
Just my 0.2 cents.
BM
Well, I saw her. If her pics are fake, then she could be the other girl's twin as far as body goes. PARTICULARLY the bottom photo of her CV ad...I had that exact view...and it looked exactly like that.
The girl's Czech...so maybe they're related?
Veronica, the hot bartender,
http://www.007exoticgirls.com/view_ad.php?id=1949355273
Anna Lynne, the busty ultra-sophisticad,
http://www.eros-la.com/files/209774.htm
and super-sexy woman,
http://escortcontact.info/photo/865d43141f2acb654b4db801f13493f6
http://losangeles.sugarnights.com/escorts/vip-anna-lynne
Margaret, the discrete companion,
http://escortcontact.info/escorts/usa/california/los-angeles/512-margaret_discreet_executive_companion
Who also goes by Erica, who also goes by Lola Love
http://los-angeles-escorts.cityvibe.com/escorts/list/231881.htm
http://www.eros-la.com/files/216222.htm
Or
Anna Leann, the GFE/PSE late 30ish Cezch?
http://los-angeles-escorts.cityvibe.com/escorts/list/373485.htm
I must admit that I just looked at the number of reviews from her reviewer.
I basically think if someone has many reviews then that gives some assurance that the girl is legit.
The multiple girls per phone number is curious.
Could they be using the same booker / agency?
Anyway, there are now two people who say she is legit.
Balboa
I can tell you FOR SURE that she answers her own phone and does her own booking. Actually that was probably the most annoying and "weirding out" part of the whole process.
ALL of those photos, with the exception of the very first link, could be the girl I saw. HOWEVER I can tell that the one named "Lola Love" is not her because of the jawline and the body is much more toned.
That said, you DO realize that some girls change their names with their ads, don't you? In fact, I'd say that MOST girls in the business change their names at some point or another. And many use fake images, though if the photos on the Anna Leann ad are NOT her, then I'll be surprised.
Regardless...I saw the girl. She was legit. And those of you who know me, or who met me at the last M&G know I'm for real and wouldn't lie. Shoot...it's not Like I get a freakin' cut of the profits. LOL
http://www.007exoticgirls.com/view_ad.php?id=1949355273
Anna Lynne, the busty ultra-sophisticad,
http://www.eros-la.com/files/209774.htm
and super-sexy woman,
http://escortcontact.info/photo/865d43141f2acb654b4db801f13493f6
http://losangeles.sugarnights.com/escorts/vip-anna-lynne
Margaret, the discrete companion,
http://escortcontact.info/escorts/usa/california/los-angeles/512-margaret_discreet_executive_companion
Who also goes by Erica, who also goes by Lola Love
http://los-angeles-escorts.cityvibe.com/escorts/list/231881.htm
http://www.eros-la.com/files/216222.htm
Or
Anna Leann, the GFE/PSE late 30ish Cezch?
http://los-angeles-escorts.cityvibe.com/escorts/list/373485.htm
http://www.tineye.com/search/9991023fe91ee0a6f1586a9e3abbafbdb67be88e/
http://www.tineye.com/search/93351b2cece82a1a2f3aff51667c44dc3c12661b/
http://www.tineye.com/search/0d7a4bea5dc2777cb088caa77d01709ca07281e4/
http://www.tineye.com/search/c548650113fd7143b82e35375dbffb9ce3961a4a/
http://www.tineye.com/search/96800d9ff07246798482737edfd3b7d46ee3f7af/
http://www.tineye.com/search/603e42678cc7d3fb9f60615291ff1ef6904d67dd/
Because I don't see why you've got such a hard on in this case.
I'm a long time poster...I saw the girl...she looked JUST like the girl in those photos.
What more do you freakin' need?
Unless you're either insinuating or openly calling me a liar.
Which is it?
http://www.tineye.com/search/93351b2cece82a1a2f3aff51667c44dc3c12661b/
http://www.tineye.com/search/0d7a4bea5dc2777cb088caa77d01709ca07281e4/
http://www.tineye.com/search/c548650113fd7143b82e35375dbffb9ce3961a4a/
http://www.tineye.com/search/96800d9ff07246798482737edfd3b7d46ee3f7af/
http://www.tineye.com/search/603e42678cc7d3fb9f60615291ff1ef6904d67dd/
And after this exchange, you like it or not you are just confirming my points:
I argued that there were some reasons to doubt that the person in the photos could be the one who will show up...
You said "there was no DOUBT', but once I posted all the links, by your admission excluding the first one, all of the photos might be of her...so this sound to me enough to confirm my doubts since even you are not able to tell the difference between one lady and the others...to support this I then I posted all the links showing that all those pictures are clearly fakes, including the bottom pictures of her CV ad that you said "looked exactly like hers"...but that it cannot be because that pics is stolen from two internet websites.
Thus, since, by your own admission, all the photos I posted can be of her, and all the photos are stolen in one way or another, this support my inference that before you thrown 800 Benjas you should do a criss-cross reasearch...perhaps not many here are so 'intuitive' like you on picking ladies without thinking twice about 800 bucks...but even your intuition clearly has some problems as I tried to demonstrate posting all the links to support my inferences. After all, you have to agree that you are very lucky in your pick...but luck in the hobby is not random so to speak.
That's all, I'm trying to help the community here to make informed decision about their choices. This place is becoming a quagmire, full of fake reviews, supported by 'dudes' who pretend to have met ladies who clearly are not them, embedded into a network of one fake ads after another, which chains are getting bigger and bigger each year...
So relax, write you review and then hobbyst will make their decision about Anna Leann, or whoever body lies behind those pictures.
Sincerely,
BM
And you don't think she could have been the person in those photos? You presume that she isn't, but you've never met her in person. I have. She easily could be the one who posed for those photos.
And considering that I'm the one who saw her in person AND saw the photos while you're the one who only saw the photos and never saw her in person, I find it interesting that you seem to think you're better informed at making the determination if she could be the person in the photos.
Like it or not, your "point" is predicated upon assumptions on your part, not facts.
While I tend to put a lot of faith and stock in your opinions BM68 (you're one of the rewiewers who I always believe!), I can say that Gabriela of Heshrabkin's review is real because I recently met her (she asked me to NOT write a review, but if I had, I would give her an 8/9). But, after reading his review, which seemed to be glowing, I don't understand why he gave her only a 6 for performance. Regardless, she is very real and I am going to see her again soon!
cheers!
The fact that a reviewer has many reviews don't automatically mean every reviews are legit. Some people just don't get it.
But usually a person who has a lot of reviews...ESPECIALLY when they have some reviews in a) other cities and b) where they gave POOR reviews USUALLY is a safe bet.
Better to be safe than sorry? Sure. But come on, guys. You've got two long time posters (I've been on here since 1999) who are verifying it.
She wasn't the best I've had, or my ATF by ANY stretch, but she was fun. 'Nuff said.
Review looks legit, but I would ask about his rationale for his performance rating, which seems to be inconsistent with his narrative.
She's legit. Mid-to-late thirties, but in INCREDIBLE shape. CURVY, not fitness toned, but in VERY good shape. Definitely NOT a GFE, most definitely IS a PSE. No question. From looks to performance.
Personality? A BIT crazy/flighty, but still fun with a good attitude. Best recommendation is to go in with a smile on your face and sit back and enjoy the ride. You'll see what I mean afterwards.
I'll get to work on a review.
any info would be appreciated
So it sounds like her photos were "photo shopped" because the body in those pics is pretty fitness toned in my book. So much for the 1000% real.
Sounds like you had fun provided you were looking for the PSE experience. Thanks for chiming in.
I don't think they are so much photoshopped as they are old. She definitely WAS that toned at some point, and she certainly isn't out of shape by any stretch...but she's not a GND or a GFE. She's 100% pure PSE all the way.