Hello all. I was searching through the T.E.R. database to find a provider, when I became curious about the total number of escort providers we have available here in LA.
If I'm reading correctly, T.E.R. has a total of 24,989 service providers listed in the Greater Los Angeles Area. If you filter out those that do not provide escort/sex services, that brings the number down to 20,125. Of these, a large percentage haven't had any reviews in the past five years, so it's probably safe to assume they have retired by now, or at least are no longer available to the general public. If we remove those providers, that brings us down to 2802. If we then remove providers who do NOT have accurate photos or do NOT have "Services Delivered As Promised" that brings the total providers down to 1955. Is it possible we have less than 2,000 reputable escort providers in the Greater Los Angeles area? Dunno why, but that number seems low to me for any area with a population of over 10 million people. Maybe we have lots more, but they just aren't being reviewed? I'm curious what other folks think. I'm especially interested to hear from providers — does this number seem low to you? - - - - - BTW, if you exclude providers in the bottom half of "Looks" ratings ("Plain" or worse) and the bottom half of "Performance" ratings ("Average" or worse) that reduces the number of decent available providers to 893. That number feels really low to me.it has changed, since a decade ago and more. Even women in general are 'different' today of current younger generations compared to over a decae ago. TER's heyday and maybe internet/email based escorting in human and American history probably hit the peak in the 00's and early 10's. At least better than gambling on streetwalkers and drive-by's during the 70's to 90's before the web and TER in decades past. Now escorting is diluted with the general social-media culture craze with onlyfans , tinder, twitter, facebook, etc. So plenty of females within mating age range are trying out escorting no matter the quality. Plus the inflation of rates perhaps from inflation in general when one could get quality sessions from quality providers starting from the 400 level. Now I'm pretty much very occasional on trying to see a provider, sometimes not even once in a year. And the providers from the generation of the 00's are aging out past 40 or 50 now. And only the young euro or russian providers less tainted by the woked society of our first world nations look any appealing. (just look how SI swimsuit editions and victoria's secret shows and advertising is now bastardized with today's woked and identity political culture; while staying in shape and toned is no longer as valued or in vogue now as in eat and splurge without exercising all you want now or just make up for it with 'work' and 'procedures' done.) Unfortunately a russian provider in her mid-latter 20's I saw back in 2020 who I had a good rapport with, is now gone when covid started and now the Ukrainian war. Anyway my two cents. I'm sure others have a better or more sound reasoned take on this.
Some of us are still here & thriving, like a fine wine…
890 of them are out of your budget.......I can see your dilemma.