She has two pages of reviews and most of her reviewers are seasoned reviewers.
She obviously has two profiles, and they should be merged. That's not a crime. It happens.

Now, if you want to rat her out for posting TER's property on her website, then fine.

If she's a fake, your post does not prove it.

And you base your evidence on what?

It seems strange to me that this agency slanders a well reviewed provider.  The provider links to the TER review, does that make the TER review fake?  Does that mean the many gentlemen that have seen her are also fake?  When I provide screening info, which usually includes an email address, the screener usually contacts the provider to get verfication.  Sounds like that didn't happen here.

I would think that an agency that posts fake pictures should not be the one making such accusations.  Look at the reviews for Aubrey and Brandy.  Oh, yeah, the agency will say the pictures are representative of the provider so that's ok -- but in my definition, representative pictures are still not real (or fake)!