If he's such a good client why would he out them? He wouldn't. It's more haters who want to hurt the girls. Even making sure he mentions that now Pepsi's boy friend will know. They may or may not do BB but when it comes out like this you can rest assured there is an ulterior motive. This is a review that should have been screened and rejected.
I've not seen either the legendary Pepsi or Yoona, but the fact that this guy is from out of town, and claims to have seen Pepsi on ten occasions seems suspect to me . . .
If he's such a good client why would he out them? He wouldn't. It's more haters who want to hurt the girls. Even making sure he mentions that now Pepsi's boy friend will know. They may or may not do BB but when it comes out like this you can rest assured there is an ulterior motive. This is a review that should have been screened and rejected.
I also had in the pass some people spreading liers just so to either hurt me or hurt my success as a Courtesan. Not all reviews are written for the right reasons and I think that the reviewer should be assessed as much as the review.
Lets be honest here somethings a bit fishy when those three reviewers have only 3 reviews and nearly identical time frames. I dont buy what they're selling. Lets all be careful out there but this is very fishy to me.
...He says: "Lets just say I don't care anymore after my last test."
What is this supposed to mean? That he doesn't care if he does BB because he has already contracted a fatal disease? And he doesn't care that he may be transmitting it to others?
The 4 reviews alluding to bbfs seem sketchy. I'm sure they were reported to ter, but maybe if it came from you they would do something about it.
I also filed a report to flag pepsi's latest review where she gets a 9/10 for blowing a guy but not having sex. The reviewer's history seemed sketchy as well. Ter responded that her profile allows her to be qualified for 10's.
So, do you still wonder why guys dont enthusiastically send in problem reports?
This guy is either a predicate felon by knowingly passing on an STD or he is a vicious fiend looking to hurt this lady's rep. Iccan't speak for every Kgirl but of the 10 or so I've seen not one has ever so much has suggested such a thing and given the strict controls their managers appear to apply it's very hard to believe the girls would suddenly start engaging in such a practice. Indeed when you read the review the tone and subject are deliberate: he focused almost exclusively on "revealing" his find and not on the rest of the encounter. Everything about the review screams "wolf" and betrays an agenda having nothing to do with happy hobbying. If he's done this 10 times why tell us now if at all?
We all know BBFS happens. But in other reviews where it was mentioned it seemed to be an incident of the review narrative not its chief and overwhelming focus. This guy seems to be on a nefarious mission.
Yes. I had the same observation about that review. Injecting the boyfriend "now he knows" told me that the review is definitely a fake and designed to discredit her. Your other observations are spot on.
I read 4 reviews that implicated her doing BBFS. All are on the first page (most recent). I didn't read all of her reviews, but I do find it suspicious that they suddenly started to appear, but at the same time I can't discount them entirely.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
