I understand, respect and agree with most of what you're saying- but what about reclamation? Sex work (and related issues of criminalization, working conditions, job discrimination, politicians exploiting 'sex trafficking' to crack down on sex work, etc.) is a civil/human rights issue, as well as one of economic and health parity. In the vein of many other rights movements and oppressed groups who have embraced language reclamation as an empowerment tactic (LGBT, black civil rights, feminism, Chicano/a movement, etc.), we can choose to embrace the negative connotations our opposition has attached to words and labels, or we can start using them ourselves and actually change their meaning.
Words and labels are social constructs; they are dynamic and fluid. If we go along with the derogatory associations of hooker, whore, prostitute, etc., then those words remain powerful and can be used against us. I especially LOVE the terms hooker and whore, because they have historic power and in my circles signify a giant umbrella of different ways to be a sex worker (as well as embodying a sense of irony). 'Whore' has gained significant reclamation traction in sex work and feminist activist/academic circles, and has come to mean a sexual healer, an intuitive, a job/role with powerful historicity requiring a broad skill set. While 'prostitute' is harder to reclaim because of its very specific legal connotations, I definitely advocate interrogating why we choose to embrace the word associations impressed upon us by our opponents.
-- Modified on 4/24/2014 8:09:11 AM