are definitely in that rare category of ladies who look better in person than they do in their pics. The pics are smokin' hot, don't get me wrong. But both of them far exceeded my expectations when I was fortunate enough to get my first appointments with them.
It really is such a wonderful thing when that happens. Since 90% of the time, it's the exact opposite.
* I recently had a kind of quandry in writing a review -- was a bit disappointed that the provider did not look as good as her CV pics, but did not consider it so drastic as to list "no" on that item about fair portrayal of pics. Wish TER has a level not as drastic as "no", but "pics enhanced or photoshopped".
What would you list in such case? There are so many such enhanced pics.
* Btw, in my limited experience (less than 2 yrs) in TER community, I've met only 4 who live up to the CV pics: Lita, Rani and Rosella are exactly as shown in CV; Amber looks better than her CV pics.
* Of course many others don't fall under this discussion because they deliberately blur their faces in CV.
The profile will remain the same as before your review, unless you fill out a problem report
In addition to Amber you have Boa , Hosi, Kami and Lohan are among the unblured faces who more than live up to their ad photos.
The photos are meant to at least resemble the K-doll however, to often the discrepancy is in the body figure. I recall Audrey's initial ad during her first tour did not feature her tattoos her ad during her second stint did show her cropped black dyed hair which , in my opinion, gave her a uniques and better look.
What would you list in such case? There are so many such enhanced pics.
* Btw, in my limited experience (less than 2 yrs) in TER community, I've met only 4 who live up to the CV pics: Lita, Rani and Rosella are exactly as shown in CV; Amber looks better than her CV pics.
* Of course many others don't fall under this discussion because they deliberately blur their faces in CV.
Boa and Lohan are undoubtedly the best two hardbodies on CV.
Then again....what do I know....
Beemer
In addition to Amber you have Boa , Hosi, Kami and Lohan are among the unblured faces who more than live up to their ad photos.
The photos are meant to at least resemble the K-doll however, to often the discrepancy is in the body figure. I recall Audrey's initial ad during her first tour did not feature her tattoos her ad during her second stint did show her cropped black dyed hair which , in my opinion, gave her a uniques and better look.
What would you list in such case? There are so many such enhanced pics.
* Btw, in my limited experience (less than 2 yrs) in TER community, I've met only 4 who live up to the CV pics: Lita, Rani and Rosella are exactly as shown in CV; Amber looks better than her CV pics.
* Of course many others don't fall under this discussion because they deliberately blur their faces in CV.
Alas! Hosi is gone again.
Hosi will be back after vacation , LA is second home and should be back within 2 months- he prays.
Not to worry. She told me she'll be back after a vacation.
she's vacationing at my house.
I wish.
What times the party start?
are definitely in that rare category of ladies who look better in person than they do in their pics. The pics are smokin' hot, don't get me wrong. But both of them far exceeded my expectations when I was fortunate enough to get my first appointments with them.
It really is such a wonderful thing when that happens. Since 90% of the time, it's the exact opposite.
Real providers use fake pics, so score them accordingly. REal pics-NO!
Loser's get a life & stop stealing photo's, or totally photo shopping them to make you appear to be model material!
Since I do not patronize the other sections or girls of CV you may be right about them, but I find the CV Asian section to be the most reliable site of all for ads and more of the K-dolls look better in person than disappoint. Still the clients have the option to walk away if the pictures do not resemble the doll. CV along with TER reviews helped the K-dolls become so dominant in the LA hobby scene and that would not have happened if the ads do not resemble the doll.
I find many of the provider websites use outdated if not fake photos with hidden or blurred faces .I guess the M & G , where you see the girls as is are useful for leveling the playing field.
Loser's get a life & stop stealing photo's, or totally photo shopping them to make you appear to be model material!
Agreed!
I would say that 90 percent of Asian CV pics are accurate or that the girl would look much better in person than her ad pic.
Honestly most of these Kgirls are head turners in any case.
Beemer
I find many of the provider websites use outdated if not fake photos with hidden or blurred faces .I guess the M & G , where you see the girls as is are useful for leveling the playing field.
Loser's get a life & stop stealing photo's, or totally photo shopping them to make you appear to be model material!
I have to disagree. This is highly subjective, of course, but my experience has been that the CV Asian provider photos are doctored far too much. The k-organization must have a very good Photoshop artist, because he/she makes every girl look like a 9 or 10. And, in the real world, they are not all 9s and 10s.
There are only a small number of ladies who look BETTER in person than they do in those air-brushed, body-altering photos, IMO. Kami and Lohan definitely do look better. I don't want to single out others who do not, but I would say the great majority of them do not.
They are still hot! No question about that. Just not as hot as the pics -- again, IMO.
True. Very highly subjective matter.
In my experience so far at least, I have had the good luck to run into very beautiful women such as the likes oh the Lohans, Litas and Boas and have rated them accordingly to my taste. Looks will always be subjective but as long as you enjoy the company and have a great time then who am I to critisize.
Beemer
There are only a small number of ladies who look BETTER in person than they do in those air-brushed, body-altering photos, IMO. Kami and Lohan definitely do look better. I don't want to single out others who do not, but I would say the great majority of them do not.
They are still hot! No question about that. Just not as hot as the pics -- again, IMO.
I tend to disagree I find photoshoping tends to be so superficial that is dehumanizes the K-Doll and separates her from her natural beauty which is apparent when you see the K-Doll in person.
I do not finds photoshoped picture to rank as. 9's or10's but rather fake looking, example is one of the latest pictures of Amber , who is regarded by many as a true beauty in person, her current ad picture simply doesn't do her justice ; same with Lita , i presefer their previous ad photos which made them look more natural than the most recent ads that do them no favors.
But again this is subjective and 5 guys can offer 8 opinions.
There are only a small number of ladies who look BETTER in person than they do in those air-brushed, body-altering photos, IMO. Kami and Lohan definitely do look better. I don't want to single out others who do not, but I would say the great majority of them do not.
They are still hot! No question about that. Just not as hot as the pics -- again, IMO.