Los Angeles
Just a couple of issues knawing at me...
as I do my Hobbyist Homework. While perusing the list of Provider attendees for the upcoming
M&G (a number of ladies that I have not met yet), I have gone to their websites to do research
but have been stymied by a couple of trends that have started to appear over the last few years.
#1 Why do I have to pay a premium at the site to view photos of a provider that I am interested in.
Those of you who know me, know I am a conscientious hobbyist & will only choose a provider from
all of our wonderful & beautiful ladies in our area, not solely based on a provider's website or
photos only. I also use M&G's for final decisions(gotta see if we're compatible in a face to face situation
i.e. M & G's). This time there are so many ladies attending the up & coming M&G I needed a little extra
info to decide who to actually meet next week. I really don't see the need to pay to see a photo or
become a member(by giving out my e-mail address to receive unwanted updates from a number of
providers-Ican access updates from providers' availability calendar. And while on the subject of photos
#2 I am tired of looking at photos, that are shot from above,while the provider is lying on her back.
Making an informed decision about a provider is paramount to me. That means as true a picture of a
provider's body type is desired. I understand at least one reason is to minimize body fat. I could care
less if it flattens out by having a photo shot down from above. I will pick you if I like you. Not because
you look like you have an ounce or two less body fat. This has been a trend over the last few years &
bugs me. Early on in my Hobbying I was disappointed by some providers who did not give a true image
of their body type, only because it did not match what I had pictured in my mind from photos on the provider's
website. Now, I will admit that some of those encounters were incredible despite my imagination's disappointment.
I also know this photo issue does not have as much weight as say : airbrushing or substituted photos. I know
that I may catch some flak about this thread, but I truly would like hear from hobbyists & providers alike over these 2 issues.
Stand Tall and be Healthy my TERistas
Shit!!! Wasn't much more than 15 years ago all we had to go by is was 4 line ad and a grainy news-print photo in a hastily produced "trade paper"!
If prostitution was fully legalized in America the Truth In Advertising laws couldn't even approach such supercilious pedantics.
I think every provider needs to have at least a FEW photos openly available to the public and that they look like she will look when you see her! On my new site I will have this as well as a "password protected" area. only because these are showing more and I want to make sure I have controle over who gets to view them. I think it is ok to have members only options as well as charging, however, NOT be the ONLY option to checking out a lady for future appointment request. I will NEVER understand why a provider would over do touching up her photos, some of them look like they literally have PLASTIC skin...eek! I think they are only setting themselves up for bad reviews and possible rejections at the door...God, I would be REALLy embarassed if that happened to me! There is a market for mature ladies as I myself am, We don't NEED to try and compete in the 22 yrs. old market..it is apples and oranges, BOTH are good but DIFFERENT. Represent who you ARE and you are guaranteed that the people who contact you will be happy with what they see when they meet you in person!
I agree on this topic totally. I see it from the provider's viewpoint as a way to have more control over their photos, as well as a way to generate additional income. Nothing wrong with that at all. However, to have a single perhaps not totally representative photo and then the rest are premium is not productive unless your sole purpose is to generate income from the photos themselves. What it does is reduce your reach to clients who aren't going to pay for the premium, and believe me it's not a money issue for those clients, it's a hassle and potentially a waste of money if in the end those pictures don't fit their appetite. I make a very good income, even for L.A., but I'm not going to waste $9.95 to $19.95 just to see some basic photos I can see on thousands of other providers websites I've seen. We don't need to see dozens of photos, but 3 to 6 good photos with clothes and bikinis on, we want to see your shape and style.
I also agree with Eve77kn on the age issue. If you're really late 20s, early 30s or even 40s, don't pretend to be 22 to 25. If you look like most of you do, who cares about your age, but at least I can judge your potential personality maturity and experience more acurately. I recently began seeing a new provider for me, which I hesitated originally because her ad said she was 22 or 24, and when I met her in person it was clear and she confirmed afterwards, she was mid 30s, but who the hell cares. She is gorgeous and has become an ATF of mine now. But beause of my age, 40s, I'm not really interested in seeing the young 20 somethings unless they had someting that really atracted me to them, and it isn't just their physical appearance.
Have fun, play safe.
i have been noticing a trend as well, with providers asking potential clients to pay to view their photos. i do realize that i am no one to say how i feel someone else should run their business, but for me, it seems like shooting yourself in the foot. i mean, pepsi doesnt charge me a buck everytime i choose to watch their commercial, right? just as this business, it is a cost they fork over because it is advertising. i have not heard of many business that will charge their potential clients for their advertising costs, because it is silly. well, to me it is anyway. if my business is to the point of charging people to view pics of me, then i will cut costs somewhere else. maybe taking more snapshots instead of hiring a photographer for my pics?
i also wanted to comment about memberships to girls' websites. i have been updating my own website and i was asked the question about do i want guys to be a member. um, im not sure what the purpose of that really is. i dont want their info nor do i want to be responsible for storing it for no apparrent reason. analytics i suppose, but other than that, i really see no use in it.
as for your second comment...i am lucky to get decent photos at all, so i am not really thinking about how is best going to hide myself. if i want to do that, i will just put clothes on. lol i know i am not 20, nor do i want to be 20 again. there is really no competition between the 2. lol
Honey, us twins are looking forward to seeing you again! xoxo Smile 4 us!
My web site is free my pics are real
along with my 38ff twins
Im a very busty lady and lots of curves still ,, just thinner now!
I will be at the M&G
Kisses Gina
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
We thank you for your purchase!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
