Judging from her photos, she has serious acne and stretch marks. Her reviews never mention any, I assume most men were being too nice or too chicken to point it out. I don't believe she is only 19 or 20, more like 19 going on 29.
I wish I could use an alias but I'm no longer VIP. This is a new handle, my old one was blacklisted for giving an honest review. I'm in the same boat again. I reviewed a provider, she did not like my scores and comments. I have been honest and the review was not written in rude or disrespectful language. I sent admin the proof that the provider and I met. End of story.
Later I was browsing Cityvibe Vegas and saw this provider advertising under another name. I looked at BP and a third name came up, same provider. The rates were different. She was $300 on BP, advertised a VIP special on Eros for $400. She also changed her race from black to Native American. The photos are the same provider and it is easy to connect the dots. This calls into question of her integrity.
She also happens to have 3 new reviews under her new alias. The reviewers are the same hobbyists who reviewed her under her old name. Isn't that cheating the system? Should her reviewers get 15 VIP days for reviewing her under a second name? I think not. Damn right I'm reporting it.
I am calling her out by name because she questioned my integrity too. Mikki Moss, aka Michelle Moss, aka Gabrielle Gordeaux, are you trying to pull a fast one on us?
In my review I mentioned that she had some acne and stretch marks. None of her other reviewers mentioned that before. She just posted new photos and they show all those features. See the cityvibe link below for proof of her using 3 names and the acne and stretch marks.
The last I checked TER was a review board. Our job is to review them, tell it like it is. I do not want to be blacklisted again for being honest but if I am, I will restart with another handle. If a provider can have 3 names at once, so can a hobbyist. Learn whatever you will from my example TER breathen.
No PM's please, reply here.
-- Modified on 2/3/2012 6:50:13 PM
Sharing the good, bad, and the ugly. You also did the right thing by reporting this to staff. Well done sir.
I don't know if you saw my previous stings in the general section. I feel like I've been chewed up and shit out by psycho providers and their blacklisting over honest reviews.
Why would your account be deleted?
Just asking
My previous handle had over a dozen reviews but a provider who didn't like my scores blacklisted me. I had other providers refuse to see me because of that. I'm starting over thanks to an insecure and revengeful woman.
In both of her ads under the name Gabrielle (and in the CV link you posted), Mikki mentions both names- it's not a different persona. While I agree that it's unfair that three reviewers got extra VIP time for posting reviews of the same woman under a different name, it definitely doesn't appear that she is trying to be two people.
Moreover- she's mixed, and seeing as how her specific background isn't a checkbox option, I see no problem with her listing herself under two different racial/ethnic categories.
She was Mikki Moss for a year. Why did she suddenly change her name to Michelle? And then change it again to Gabrielle? I tell you why. Her review scores started to go from 9 to 8 to 7.
She advertises as black and French Canadian as Mikki Moss and as Creole and Native American as Gabrielle Gordeaux. I would argue that those are different ethnicities. Why not just use 1 name and say you're black?
her last two reviews (as mikki moss) were 10/10... the 7's look to be anomalies. While I don't know about the Gabrielle part, I'm guessing that she changed her name from Mikki to Michelle because it's more upscale and mature... she was upfront about that and I don't think that is grounds for saying she lacks integrity.
Judging from her photos, she has serious acne and stretch marks. Her reviews never mention any, I assume most men were being too nice or too chicken to point it out. I don't believe she is only 19 or 20, more like 19 going on 29.
I was the reviewer who gave her 7's.
I have many reviews on TER and have always been fair and honest in my reviews. I have never had a problem with any provider I reviewed ever.
Since my review of Mikki I have received a few PM's from her - outraged over the fact that I gave her 7's and she proceeded to basically threaten me and I quote "your review has not only resulted in me DNS you, and blacklisted you".
I guess she also contacted several other providers and said in her PM to me "there are SEVERAL ladies in the LA community that have also chosen not to see you as well."
She demanded I retract my review immediately. I told her that she is an accident waiting to happen and I do not want to be anywhere near her when it does. I also told her that she makes me uneasy and not to contact me again.
I hope I never hear from her again.
I miss you my friend! 
Xoxo,
Nat
hey Nat
Just left you a PM
deek
If a provider gives us trouble, we have a right to let TER know. Providers do the same. Your right about her being an accident waiting to happen. She is a very hot headed young woman.
There recently was an incident in which an asian provider got a really harsh and honest review and she tried to preach to the board that this reviewer was lying and what not. Eventually she had to eat her own words due to the backlash that followed.
I applaud you on your honesty and at least the fortitude to post this here sans an alias.
Beemer
Later I was browsing Cityvibe Vegas and saw this provider advertising under another name. I looked at BP and a third name came up, same provider. The rates were different. She was $300 on BP, advertised a VIP special on Eros for $400. She also changed her race from black to Native American. The photos are the same provider and it is easy to connect the dots. This calls into question of her integrity.
She also happens to have 3 new reviews under her new alias. The reviewers are the same hobbyists who reviewed her under her old name. Isn't that cheating the system? Should her reviewers get 15 VIP days for reviewing her under a second name? I think not. Damn right I'm reporting it.
I am calling her out by name because she questioned my integrity too. Mikki Moss, aka Michelle Moss, aka Gabrielle Gordeaux, are you trying to pull a fast one on us?
In my review I mentioned that she had some acne and stretch marks. None of her other reviewers mentioned that before. She just posted new photos and they show all those features. See the cityvibe link below for proof of her using 3 names and the acne and stretch marks.
The last I checked TER was a review board. Our job is to review them, tell it like it is. I do not want to be blacklisted again for being honest but if I am, I will restart with another handle. If a provider can have 3 names at once, so can a hobbyist. Learn whatever you will from my example TER breathen.
No PM's please, reply here.
-- Modified on 2/3/2012 6:50:13 PM
I can understand confusion on both parts. However, I dont think Mikki was trying to do anything but mature her persona. On the Thursday thread she even makes mention that she is hanging up her ears in favor of the more mature name of Michelle. She has been in biz for a year and is finding her way. And as far as I can tell tell she is doing it quite well. If you read her posts and ads I think she is trying to be honest Give her a break. She's a sweet gal with great service.
and now lets get back to the fuc%#ing and su*%ing and have some fun gents!
Thats my $0.25 (tee hee)
Read all of it. Then read what DEEKER said.
Question: if you are paying for a good time, why on earth would you walk into a room and see something you didn't like and STILL pay for in an industry based upon selection??????? INSANITY!!!!!
Over the past nine months in my expedition into this alternative lifestyle, as a provider who doesn't have the right to review her customers I find it hilarious that a hobbyists would pay for something that deserves a 7 or below when most are at the same rates. Fortunately for me, the clients I have not connected with and have turned down services have not written reviews. If I did not find the person exciting, eventhough they were paying I would kindly decline the donation based upon personal morals and taste. So, it baffles me that the hobbyists WHO might I note are PAYING for a date would EVER see someone they are NOT attracted to and then b***h about it in a review. Dude, rule one of PAYING for someone's time that you don't find attractive .... Bottom line that is dumb and desperate, you would have had a cheaper tab at your local watering hole and could have laughed about it the next day. instead, you actually take the time to ADMIT you paid for a date with an ugly chick and think you have a right to b***h about it. From one human to another what has this world come to??? Kindergarten ring a bell? Last time I checked I learned my ABC's.... 1+1 doesn't equal 10...
Like it or not this is the Truth and the sadness of this business. really...think about it, pussy for thought!
Xoxox
The one and only Eyva Ferrari...
If you are reading thing this, please take the time to reflect as to WHY all the crazy, childish things on in such a liberal, forward thinking lifestyle could be happening. Aren't we all trying to just enjoy ourselves and find satisfaction through amazing like minded people??? That was my mission statement when I started and it remains my purpose in life. Connect with those you wish to connect with, leave the others to someone who finds them beautiful and exciting. Everyone has something special to.offer in life, it is not your job to determine what that is. It is only your job to determine what makes you happy. If she doesn't, the next will. Ladies, if you are not feeling it and the rents not due (eventhough I wouldn't do it)...NEXt. there are always.more fish in the sea, be intelligent don't pay for chopped liver for the price of filet. Duh... Yes, I just went kindegarten status...had to stoop to the level of this idiocy.
I rarely post on a discussion board and the only reason I relied to this subject was the fact that I had just seen Mikki very recently and then 2 days ago received very aggressive PM's from her going off on me about insulting her and writing a false service review. As I mentioned in my first post she then explained that she had already started an action plan which included:
Communication with TER to have my review removed
DNSing me - I have no idea what DNS is but whatever it is I guess I got it now
Blacklisting me - I am not sure what that is either.
She explained she also had contacted several ladies who now after talking with her will not see me now.
Heck, all I did was give her 7's in my review !!
Furthermore she said that I lied about her appearance in my review. She said and I quote "I am NOT 5'3"
and I DO NOT have a hair pussy that was unbearable - especially relative to some of the other ladies you have seen."
Maybe she is not 5'3" as I stated - maybe she is 5'4' or maybe even 5'5" - heck I don't know but like I said to her she advertises 5'7" and she ain't that.
The pussy hair thing and other girls she said I have seen with even more hair - I have no idea what she is talking about
I am telling and warning all you guys on this thread that knowing her and when she reads this blog she is going to erupt and look for revenge.
Even in her PM's to me she never let the facts get in the way of a good story.
Deeker
That's definitely not okay that three guys got double the points for submitting reviews for different personas...good job catching that! ^^;
I don't know both sides of the story and know virtually nothing of the original conflict, but....
I do feel that it doesn't seem fair to publicly challenge a Mikki Moss' or any provider's integrity over the things that were mentioned... for one thing, when I met Mikki she told me she was black AND native american (and french? or something white too I forget). So what if she chooses not to list all the different ethnicity categories that she identifies with in every single ad? Is it really that big of a deal?
And as for the names...it's really not that suspicious to change one's name on occasion as a provider. There are different circumstances, and there may be a ton out there that change their info that are shady and do it for the wrong reasons but there are also some who do it for absolutely no reason at all. I don't know what Mikki's reasons were for wanting to have another name, but it doesn't seem like enough of a reason to not only assume she lacks integrity (which is fine, everyone is entitled to their own opinions and can be suspicious if they want to be), but also then write a post about those assumptions that then influence how others form their own opinions on her in the future. I changed my name once. I just didn't like mine. I was over it. I didn't even have any reviews yet. Now I use that name as my last. it doesn't mean anything. She clearly wasn't trying to hide anything either if she was using the exact same photos.
The rates too...there's no rule saying they must be constant all over the internet...the average hourly rate varies on different sites, there are specials, etc. I just really don't understand what exactly is wrong with those things that make Mikki someone who lacks integrity. I don't know Mikki well, and don't know her intentions, but I still don't see why it's necessary to jump to the most negative conclusions possible and then write about it online publicly, it seems irrational.
(Please don't be mad at me, I'm just saying this because misleading statements about one's integrity to me is just slander. I know unconditional honesty is what makes reviews so valuable to others, but this here is spiteful and serves no purpose)
did you see her if you didnt like what you saw when she opened the door? Why didnt you just say thank you, but no thank you ?
Instead, like a fool, you see her,(even though you find her unattractive) hand over your money, do your "deed", and go your merry way. THEN you give her a bad review Why did you waste your money? Why not leave.
I do not write reviews anymore, but it is only human nature, be it right or wrong, when someone writes something on a public board for everyone to see and read, that person will want to retaliate. And the only way they CAN retaliate is on Blacklists and such. Remember hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. Why not just NOT write the damned review ? Why write reviews with information that is so mean, and really just nastiness on your part.
YOU went through with an appointment with a lady you did not find attractive, pay your money (fool) and THEN you write a bad review? Don't you feel silly admitting to that dude.
I do not know Mikki and have no dog in this fight but reading her past reviews, seems like nobody else had this problem.
Please post this in Las Vegas board. She tours there as well/calls it home etc. I'm sure that everyone will be interested in this info.
Unless TER has a rule against posting on multi boards.
is unfortunately all too common. We have desperate vindictive providers harassing and badgering clients for doing nothing more than reporting on their experience.
If a provider does not like a 7 she should up her game to the next level.
We need more outings of girls to enable us to avoid them.
Later I was browsing Cityvibe Vegas and saw this provider advertising under another name. I looked at BP and a third name came up, same provider. The rates were different. She was $300 on BP, advertised a VIP special on Eros for $400. She also changed her race from black to Native American. The photos are the same provider and it is easy to connect the dots. This calls into question of her integrity.
She also happens to have 3 new reviews under her new alias. The reviewers are the same hobbyists who reviewed her under her old name. Isn't that cheating the system? Should her reviewers get 15 VIP days for reviewing her under a second name? I think not. Damn right I'm reporting it.
I am calling her out by name because she questioned my integrity too. Mikki Moss, aka Michelle Moss, aka Gabrielle Gordeaux, are you trying to pull a fast one on us?
In my review I mentioned that she had some acne and stretch marks. None of her other reviewers mentioned that before. She just posted new photos and they show all those features. See the cityvibe link below for proof of her using 3 names and the acne and stretch marks.
The last I checked TER was a review board. Our job is to review them, tell it like it is. I do not want to be blacklisted again for being honest but if I am, I will restart with another handle. If a provider can have 3 names at once, so can a hobbyist. Learn whatever you will from my example TER breathen.
No PM's please, reply here.
-- Modified on 2/3/2012 6:50:13 PM
It's really not TER, it's TWKR (The White Knight Review) and our job is leave only good reviews or get the backlash of fellow members and providers. Remember, if you leave an honest review and it isn't a great one, your the scum of the earth and should be banned from the industry forever and ever!
Did you get the same girl you saw pictures of when you saw her ad? I did! I have Met Mikki/Michelle/ Gabrielle a few weeks ago in Vegas. Did not notice any stretch marks or acme. To be honest, i was engulphed in the young beautiful women in front of me. That is just sad if that what you remember from your time with her.
What difference does the name make, its not real any way? Same goes for Race! If you cant tell from the picture, it probably doesnt matter. I was aware that she had different names and didnt post a single review, because who really gives a crap about 15 days VIP when your already a member?
I will definetly see her again and again. I have seen several girls during my vegas trip, and Mikki was by far the best! Lets not get caught up in technicalities and semantics.
Later I was browsing Cityvibe Vegas and saw this provider advertising under another name. I looked at BP and a third name came up, same provider. The rates were different. She was $300 on BP, advertised a VIP special on Eros for $400. She also changed her race from black to Native American. The photos are the same provider and it is easy to connect the dots. This calls into question of her integrity.
She also happens to have 3 new reviews under her new alias. The reviewers are the same hobbyists who reviewed her under her old name. Isn't that cheating the system? Should her reviewers get 15 VIP days for reviewing her under a second name? I think not. Damn right I'm reporting it.
I am calling her out by name because she questioned my integrity too. Mikki Moss, aka Michelle Moss, aka Gabrielle Gordeaux, are you trying to pull a fast one on us?
In my review I mentioned that she had some acne and stretch marks. None of her other reviewers mentioned that before. She just posted new photos and they show all those features. See the cityvibe link below for proof of her using 3 names and the acne and stretch marks.
The last I checked TER was a review board. Our job is to review them, tell it like it is. I do not want to be blacklisted again for being honest but if I am, I will restart with another handle. If a provider can have 3 names at once, so can a hobbyist. Learn whatever you will from my example TER breathen.
No PM's please, reply here.
-- Modified on 2/3/2012 6:50:13 PM
Interesting that a new hobbyist with no review history shows up to defend her honor. If she was the best you've ever seen and she is beautiful like you said, why didn't you review her? Let me guess you will now to counter act the assholes like me and Deeker and the other hobbyists who gave an honest review. Or is this your 4th persona Mikki? Did you just sign up as a hobbyist to post this response or is this a shill WK? I'm sick of the WK's and providers defending bad behavior. TER is a review board and we ought to stop rewarding bad behavior from providers. Review retaliation, blacklisting over opinions and scores shouldn't be tolerated. Senator157, your opinion means nothing to me. I know who I saw and what she looked like. For you to say you saw no stretch marks and acne, are you kidding me? Look at her most recent ad photos. It wasn't a deal breaker, I mentioned it because her other reviewers didn't, and in my book she's a 7. End of story. She also has a bad attitude and an inflated ego because of the WK shills. Not good.
I have been sitting on the sidelines but I can no longer bite my tongue. I have seen Mikki/Michelle/Gabrielle several times to say the least;
1. She is most definitely 5'-6". I know how tall I am. I know how she fits in my arms. I don't need a tape measure - end of story.
2. She is most definitely in the 21-25 year old category. Don't believe it? Try buying her a drink at the bar. I know the legal age for drinking. End of story.
3. Last time I checked Mikki/Michelle's TER profile it said "Partially Shaved." if hair down there surprises you learn how to read English.
4. Stretch marks? Everyone has them to some extent. Hell I have them on my legs from when I worked out more than I do now. Noticeable? I've scrutinized every inch of this young lady's body trust me - and there is nothing out of place that shouldn't be there. End of story.
5. Ethnicity? Grow up people! Depending on how far back in time I go I can claim to be several different nationalities. To me, Mikki/Michelle/Gabrielle's heritage is she comes from the DamnFineGorgeous region of Hotsville.
6. Name? As several have already stated - she doesn't hide that there are different personas. And if you don't believe that Gabrielle from Vegas is a totally different Provider experience than Mikki/Michelle in soCal I'll front you so you can see her twice in both venues and then you come tell me that was the "same" Provider. Just like a duo is a different Provider experience even though you saw each of the women individually.
7. VIP points. You know what - if that really gives you grief - take them. Better yet I'll give them to you since you seem kind of hard up for points. Better yet, how about I front you the huge investment so you can PAY for VIP because apparently that escapes you. And canceling your old handle/status - don't believe that can be done - TER owns it just like they own reviews etc.
I cannot comment and will not conjecture on what transpired between the two of you. I will assume you're both adults and something went arry. But don't for a second jump on this Board with some pompous soap box excuse about how you're trying to protect the rest of us from such a dangerous threat to Hobbying as Michelle. We should all be so lucky that she's the biggest danger out there - wouldn't that be nice.
I have seen women with similar or higher ratings and have been woefully disappointed. Either chalk it up to YMMV and keep silent, or grow a pair and write the review and take your lumps.
PS - DNS means Do Not See and means if she is asked that is what she'll say - she would not see you again. It's every Provider's choice to take that info and make their own judgement. Blacklist? If you indeed do have 12 reputable reviews and therefor 12 other ladies to vouch for you, then a Blacklist means nothing. If I was blacklisted tomorrow (and because of a few mutually bad decisions there are probably one or two ladies who might have given it a thought,) then I guess I'd be stuck with only the women I've seen - aw shucks that would suck.
In conclusion, as another Poster commented - go get laid.
shanahanluu
My last post I am going to write on this subject. I read your post and I am little confused with whom you are referring to with your comments. Some of the comments appear to be directed at me which is cool and I wanted to respond. If not, I apologize in advance.
I think I have over 150 TER reviews and never had any issue with any provider I have seen.
As far as her height which is not the main issue anyone is talking about or cares about in this thread (I know how tall I am too) - she is not 5'7" as she advertises. However tall she is only matters to me as I was the one who paid $400. I like tall girls and that is one of the reasons, albeit a minor one, that I choose her.
I never said anything about her age - your guess seems right to me. I also never said anything about acme on her face or stretch marks. Never commented on what names she uses - could care less if she changes her name to Mrs. Shanahanluu
I did not see any stretch marks and her face is not full of acme and I never commented on that in my review.
Your minor league sarcasm comment about me learning how to read English because somewhere on one of her sites it says she is partially shaved. I said fairly in my review she had more hair than I like. Other people probably would not have any problem with it - I did and I am the only one that matters because it is simply my opinion.
My review of Mikki gave her a 7 in looks which means by TER definition she is attractive and I gave her a 7 in performance which means by TER definition a Hot Time. That was and still is my opinion. It is lower numbers than many of her previous reviews.
My objection is she saw the 7's and went off in PM's with me about my review. I have never had this happen before. I do not like to be threatened and she was very clear that if I did not pull the review DNS, blacklist would follow. She also said she had already contacted several other girls in LA about me. I do not like that either. I am not going to be intimated into giving her 10"s.
In my opinion there is no way she is a 10 in looks but others seem to thing differently. All I know is I would never bother to read a review from a person who gave her a 10 because our tastes vastly differ.
With both you and the OP jumping on the bandwagon it was hard to keep track - but most likely the vast majority of my comments we directed at the OP
Great post and very articulate, how refreshing!
That's because us women grow from little girls into curvy sexy women. THATS WHAT WE DO, WE GROW...
Thank you for pointing out that it's human !
Also, your message was uplifting 
Hard to find men in this industry who understand that its not A RIGHT TO SEE US, ITS A PRIVILEGE, and if treated so, they will be WELL REWARDED
Why am I not surprised that you came to WK for her? Can you explain why you reviewed her twice under two names and made it sound like she was two different women?
You know what pal, if I have to choose between being a WK versus misogynist @$$hole ...
I think my post was pretty clear - go back and read it. As I mentioned, I've had disappointing experiences with ladies who did not appear/perform/respond as advertised. For me it becomes a huge dilemma - as much as I pontificate to man up, write the review, and take your lumps, there is a stigma to being blacklisted etc. I have had 3 experiences where I was disappointed. In two of them, I wrote a review that reflected my experience. Both times TER challenged the validity, both times I provided proof of the session, both reviews were posted. The third time I decided it was YMMV and I let it go. I've not yet been blacklisted (to my knowledge) and if any of the ladies trash talked my reviews to other Providers, hasn't hurt me yet. There is also the use of a Review Alias which you might consider in the future.
As I also posted, I cannot comment on what actually happened between you two - wasn't there. But if you want to write off my post as me simply being a White Knight, go for it - I think we all can see that your posts were more about you being pissed off than protecting any one of us. With BBFS and STDs running rampant if you think little Mikki Moss is a serious threat to the Hobby, then give me some of what you're smoking because it must be goooooood!
Now if you'll all excuse me, I'm going to go get laid!
it might be a good idea if providers aren't allowed to see their reviews. I doubt TER would do it but it be a good thing I think.
I've met Mikki through the LA M&G and she is second to none. I've had the pleasure of spending lots of time with her. Not only that, but she went beyond what normally would be considerate as a professional and as a person running a business. I wish more ladies were like her. Heck, I wish more stores, restaurants, car dealerships, etc... would learn from her business sense about keeping clients happy. Just one example, I had set up an extended date with her and she was running 15 min late...okay no big deal, we live in LA traffic happens, and I've been guilty of the same thing. Not only did she offer an extra free hour with me to make it up, but she actually said I could also have a special discounted session the next time too. Now that's what I call customer service!!!!
Now, as for all you who want to give honest reviews I applaud you!!!!
My problem with this thread is that there is so many comments by people who have 2, 1 or no reviews at all trying to preach as if they are the experts or have authority over the whole situation. I know that these are all "fictional accounts" but if your going to complain, please look as if you have some background and footing to stand on.
Mikki is one of the kindest, sweetest people I've met in this hobby. She's a caring, skilled, professional provider focused on ensuring a positive customer experience.
Apart from my personal experiences with her, even if everything the OP claims is true, I just don't see much of a problem with it. I have no problem with providers using multiple names --many do. I also don't think market testing different price points on different websites is unethical; it's just good business sense to see what the market will bear.
As for the comments about physical appearance, her photos are accurate. More accurate and representative than almost any other provider I've met. If she's not your type, well, to each his own. Personally, I think she's been absolutely gorgeous every time I've seen her.
She first started out providing by the name Zimora Jhonson
www.theeroticreview.com/link/link.asp?id=166222
http://www.unitedstatesatnight.com/Nevada-Las-Vegas/escorts/l/nevada-las-vegas-escorts-female-zimora.htm
(goolge the phone number listed on this ad a lot of different pics and bad reviews)
She was caught red handed writing fake reviews on LVF (the review site for Vegas) I can't put the link on here for obvious reasons.
Then she changed her name to Mikki and joined an agency 100 proof probably to avoid the heat.
I noticed an ad on cityvibe under the name Gabrielle Gordeaux. They pics were absolutely Mikki Moss but she cropped the face off and has different dresses and outfits that are not on her site. She was trying to fool!
There was a totally different profile on TER before it was combined as well as preferred411.
The reviews all had something in common they all reviewed Mikki Moss already. So, the guys who reviewed both names knew what they were doing. Did you offer them free time or something?
Also the ad for Gabrielle Gordeaux had a minimum rate of $800 an hour and claims that she doesn't provide often (really?) and at the same time she was running $300 an hour specials under the name Mikki Moss.
Maybe now she's going by Michelle not to fool us again but because she's blacklisted on NBL.
Mikki/Michelle whatever your stage name is now, sweety your a cute young girl and have great reviews but you need to stop trying to fool the guys, we are not dumb. Most of us do our homework before we call providers.
Good work Feather..........You a genius. This girl really tried to play us like fools. I bet she moved to LA after she ran out of her luck in Vegas. You can take a girl out of the hood but can't get the hood out of the girl. She look so washed up at 21, this girl is lying out of her ass. NBL, block this girl for life because we don't want her in LA either.
I wasn't going to post on this thread, but couldn't resist after Surf's remarks. I have no idea of the Hows & Why's of
name changes & don't care. Do your effin' homework-reviews, M&G's especially as you have the opportunity for a face to face,before you plunk down your Benjamins, Who cares if a Provider advertises 2 different rates. I once had an encounter with a very good Provider from her TER ads, who told me during the encounter that she also posted on another non-TER board a tad cheaper rate because she knew for a fact that a lot of the Hobbyists on that board, were not in the same economic level as a lot of TER Hobbyists . She posted only no more than 2hr encounters on that board, but on TER, she offered many levels of encounters with an extra GF level of service. Did this bother me-HELL NO. I actually commended her on her socially aware offer to Hobbyists who are not able to afford the higher level of service. She treated those Hobbyists with the same dignity & compassion that she offered her TER clients. Now to SurfinLA's quote, "You can take a girl out of the hood but you can't get the hood out of the girl". Unfortunately, this quote is indicative of the inherent racism that still permeates throughout our society. These kinds of statements are what I call Soft or Genteel expressions of racism, that have emerged in our society as outright racism is no longer tolerated. Now before you accuse me of calling SurfinLa a racist, I am not. I am however trying to use this as an example of how such Soft or Genteel Racism/Discrimination has infiltrated our culture & idiomatic vocabulary, We need to stay constantly vigilant of such
discriminating coding of Racial attitudes in our own personal vocabulary. And before you judge me, first let me repeat
that I am not specifically attacking SurfinLA, but am pointing out a disturbing trend in cultural language, Second, it doesn't matter what race, sexual persuasion, religious , or ethnic group that utters a Genteel coding of discriminatory language. It applies to any group/individual that continues to further vilify another group/individual. Let's be a little more reflective about our own personal thoughts and vocabulary when dissatisfaction of an encounter & not lower ourselves to base & sometimes unintentional slurs. Call me a White Knight if you like. I don't mind being a WK for culture & socirty in general.
Be Strong & Stand Tall
Then please enlighten me, why would she change her name constantly? I have nothing against Zimora/Mikki/Michell/Gabrielle. Most girls have one name and build their image from there and stick with it. All the highly regard ladies, have one name and one name only. Unless she has something to hide, such as bad reviews or being blacklisted for writing her own reviews or for whatever reasons. I judge people for their integrity, I don't like to be misled or deceive. Do you? Do you enjoy being charge more for same product or service? If I was to find out later, I was being charge more then I will write to tell people about it. You think what you think, my comment wasn't being racist more about how she conduct her business. If she was honest from the get go then this wouldn't happen. She has always been outspoken on this board, but now she staying silence, when I really want to hear her side of story. The way I see it, she silently admit it. If I was wrongly accused, I certainly will go out of my way to prove people wrong. I guess it's not her in this case. I rest my case.