Please take a look at a thread from the SF board and chime in here or there about the question posed about the difference in norms (i.e., GFE v. non-GFE) and attitudes, as well as the issue of STD rates of GFE providers vs. non-GFE providers.

I'm in a civil debate with another member about it.

the guy asked how I knew GFE providers don't get higher incidents of STDs than non-GFE providers.

He also questioned me on attitudes of SF Bay Area providers who are predominantly non-GFEs vs. LA providers who are more likely GFEs.