No email address? No descripton of looks or services? No tineye hit on the photos?  I would call her up and find out if she was ever reviewed under a different name. Women this hot just don't appear out of nowhere. Something about it just doesn't seem right.

Many agencies advertise girls as independent, not that it's a rip off but it does sound like an agency ad. Real new girls are usually busting their asses to get reviews and they don't know THAT many details and terminology to put in an ad.  New girls sound new and a new girl that hot should have reviews by now even if she didn't want them someone is bound to write one.

BB

PS. Wow, I'm feeling helpful and chatty this morning.

as one of the posters says probably agency ...

Too many sites with same number and different names:
http://www.eros-la.com/files/223711.htm - this one had many hits on images from other websites
http://www.eros-la.com/dynamic-images/223/223711/2275001fs.jpg

http://www.naughtyreviews.com/escorts/christine-luvely-los-angeles-white-female
http://www.naughtyreviews.com/escorts/lisa-los-angeles-white-female-4
http://los-angeles-escorts.cityvibe.com/escorts/list/121183.htm

If they are all true, then you could be singing the tune of Lou Vega's Mambo number 5:
A little bit of Jessica ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uz4eHPD40w4

Thanks for the find on the phone number. And good point BB about the ad's too knowledgeable use of terminology. I'd forgotten to check up on that. One could hope it's an agency madam number and the girl exists amongst the others, but probably TGTBT.

An independent provider does not emphasize on photos, accuracy, upselling, etc. you can tell sn agency post by this statement in an ad "100% real photos." and they always use 100% lol