Los Angeles

Missed 1st gear..confused_smile
Beemer310 35 Reviews 684 reads
posted

But did I just miss two topics on BBFS? I just want to know as I wanted to add my input but if it was taken down by mod or author then I guess I missed the boat on that.

Is the topic of bbfs still not allowed? Anyone can please clear this up with the Beems? Just curious that's all.

Beems trying going in reverse.

surf rat494 reads

two threads taken down. but was the review taken down to go along with the topic?

Not if this is the review in question...

Posted By: surf rat
two threads taken down. but was the review taken down to go along with the topic?

That sounds like a legit review.

Never seen her before and she seems hot.  I'm sure she's done it before.

I'm still 50/50 on the whole thing.  I mean, I know it feels wonderful and great but at the same time....who wants to catch STD's?

Especially if you have a partner and kids.  

Of course we are all men and if she is hot enough, I bet most of us would do it.  But if she is ugly.....hahaha, hell no.



TER has been good to me, and we should be good to TER.

I am not sure why, but two BBFS threads have been deleted.

For our individual health and the health of the hobby, we need to continue to discuss this issue.

In my opinion we can not sweep this under the rug.

If we do not police ourselves to the degree that we can, someone else will police us, or someone someday in the hobby will acquire  something that will frighten us all.

Please continue to let us discuss FFBS pro and con.  We discuss everything else ad nauseum.

uote]

Posted By: Beemer310
But did I just miss two topics on BBFS? I just want to know as I wanted to add my input but if it was taken down by mod or author then I guess I missed the boat on that.

Is the topic of bbfs still not allowed? Anyone can please clear this up with the Beems? Just curious that's all.

Beems trying going in reverse.

NoSeriously409 reads


He acts like he didn't know it was happening, like she surprised him and it went on and on for how long and he couldn't even tell it was happening..  bS.  It's someone fishing for info or with an axe to grind.

Posted By: Beemer310
But did I just miss two topics on BBFS? I just want to know as I wanted to add my input but if it was taken down by mod or author then I guess I missed the boat on that.

Is the topic of bbfs still not allowed? Anyone can please clear this up with the Beems? Just curious that's all.

Beems trying going in reverse.

Read some of the other recent reviews, one especially intimating BBFS.  Of course this review could be BS.   No way to really know, but a PM to the reviewer might garner some info.

surf rat238 reads

review is totally true.  and there have been a couple others in the k-girl world that are clearly BBFS if you read them right.  couple time repeating, girl gets comfortable with you then BBFS.  girl might be thinking it's a way for her to stay in the states?

This is a true statement above. Trust.

Blue.Balls345 reads


Might as well now start putting that info in reviews.
It is informational.  People can weigh the risk of diseases.

I completely disagree.  It's not a public health matter.  Hobbyists are not the general public. If guys want to be completely safe, they shouldn't be in the hobby at all.   You can get an STD without BBFS.   I think it's dangerous for the girls to be reviewed as offering BBFS, because some crazy ass guy will read that and think he will get it, and go looking for it.  That just spells trouble.  I'm not denying that its not available, its a choice that the provider makes, it's not for me to judge.

Blue.Balls204 reads

Good points Froomie, and I agree that some jackass crazy guys will be demanding bbfs from providers who have reviews stating that it's available.  But the point is, you have to block it from all reviews or allow it in all reviews.  It has to be all or none.  Obviously, some reviews are being called out presently as clearly stating bbfs -- those should be removed immediately, or the rules should change so that bbfs is no longer taboo to talk about it and any review can talk about it.

Posted By: FROOMIE
I completely disagree.  It's not a public health matter.  Hobbyists are not the general public. If guys want to be completely safe, they shouldn't be in the hobby at all.   You can get an STD without BBFS.   I think it's dangerous for the girls to be reviewed as offering BBFS, because some crazy ass guy will read that and think he will get it, and go looking for it.  That just spells trouble.  I'm not denying that its not available, its a choice that the provider makes, it's not for me to judge.  

Harpman60209 reads

I agree with Froomie that while it happens  including it in reviews could compromise the safety of outed providers. hobbying is not without risk,to minimize the risk one can always abstain

Posted By: Blue.Balls

Might as well now start putting that info in reviews.
It is informational.  People can weigh the risk of diseases.

Blue.Balls231 reads

Consensus is those reviews should be removed or taken away until edited.

Those are "problem" reviews that are sticking out like a sore thumb and calling unnecessary and dangerous attention to one or two providers.

 

Posted By: Harpman60
I agree with Froomie that while it happens  including it in reviews could compromise the safety of outed providers. hobbying is not without risk,to minimize the risk one can always abstain
Posted By: Blue.Balls

Might as well now start putting that info in reviews.
It is informational.  People can weigh the risk of diseases.

Register Now!