Sunny was just a booker.  She was not an owner.

If you're detective work consists of seeing familiar photos in ads for other cities, I'd say your case is pretty weak. That doesn't mean you are not right.

First, it has yet to be confirmed by anyone I am aware of that "Sunny" or anyone she booked for got busted.  Sure, they closed up shop really quickly, at least temporarily, and someone getting busted would be a prime cause for that.  However, although there's been lots of rumor and innuendo, so far there are precious few facts on the table.

Second, the Seattle "Amber" ad uses "Gia's" old pics, not her latest, which can still be found in her (inactive) CV ad (If those are of her to begin with.  I can't tell).  I would give even odds between whether "Gia" is up there working and that she is letting someone else use her old pics up north.

It wouldn't be the first time that a k-girl has loaned or borrowed pics, and if "Gia" was trying to avoid LE (especially ICE), I would hope that she would be savvy enough not to recycle pics that can be used to track her down.

The same goes for the provider you won't name if they are the same pics she used to use.

Obviously, if your info isn't just based upon the pics in those ads, then that's another story.

That's my take, but I don't know Jack about what may have transpired or who has relocated where, so it's not worth a whole lot.

these girls go up and down the coast, go out to vegas, come back, go back to korea, come back to LA.  Hannah has actually just showed up on CV.

I do agree -- a little too much TMI, this kind of info is best shared via PMs. . . . gotta be careful