Thank you, Megan, for the thoughtful response and good work you are doing.
The New York Times seems to do a lot of work on this topic. My first exposure to it was when i read a very small part of a long series that ran over a month in the NYT magazine - Google did not help me find it, maybe someone else can find the series. It was quite a while back, but I am not sure exactly when.
It started talking about a handoff of young girls at Disneyland - apparently a great place to exchange girls because they do not look out of place - and then went into some detail about how there are very discrete markets for girls as the age and how the girls are treated and passed around as they age. There was some about boys, too.
At that point, and I was only about one page into a much longer article which was only a part of this series, I just could not take it any more, felt sick. But I have never forgotten it.
In this case, and I hate to say it, the end demand people do have it right - the only true solution is for all of us to stop looking for that Barely Legal hottie, or if we must, go through some form of detailed age verification. Neither of those things will ever happen, so we will continue to see the penalties ratcheted up for indulging that fantasy. At the end of the day, if you pay to have sex with a minor, you are guilty, even if you did not think that was what you are doing. The person who pimped him or her is guilty, too, of course, but I do not see any escape for the hobbyist, and you are going to get crushed. So before you chase that cute, young girl, just consider the risk.
Sex slavery and trafficking as it applies to adults is a lot trickier, and I tend to agree with Andrea on that one - if one is an adult and is willingly engaging in an act, I am hard pressed to see how the sexual partner is guilty of anything more than if they were committing the same act with some other willing adult. Megan or LB - if the person is 18 or older and has been "enslaved" under the law (whatever that means) does the hobbyist have an added legal liability? Moral liability, that I get - if you suspect the person is somehow being coerced and you turn a blind eye to it for fear of getting involved, you are now part of the crime. But it is hard to know what to do, which is why work such as Megan has mentioned is so important.
And as for the last note, the one about people using these issues to further other agendas, be they political, financial, religious or whatever, of course that is true since that is how it works. If you want to get something done, you search for a message that resonates and gets people to do what you want done, and this is one message that will mobilize pretty much everyone. So, yeah, we need to do what we can to make sure the right things are done, otherwise people that would like all P4P to go away, all demand to be stamped out (no matter how crazy that idea is) will continue to gain traction and squeeze all of us.
Thing is, I have no idea what to do, other than make the decision that I will do everything I can to be sure any provider I see is an adult (not a big change for me) and that I will ask if a provider is okay and here willingly if I suspect something is amiss, and am willing to make a sacrifice if I need to act in such a situation. Honestly, though, the provider is unlikely to confess anything to me, and the other signs, whatever they may be, are likely to be sufficiently ambiguous, that I doubt I will ever be obliged to make good on that pledge.
Zig