I never said that they were all tasteful. I said that they were a matter of personal preference. Some ladies really like a number of them, while others have a preference for tiny ones or none. Same goes for clients, it is a matter of personal choice. ie, some people like blondes, some brunettes, others redheads. Some like natural grooming, some landing strips, and others shaven. You are free to choose which you want to be with, so don't make statements that anything is overuse, it is their choice, you have to same choice to do business with them or not. So your original blanket statement is flawed.
Anyone share my sentiments that overuse of tatoos on an otherwise lovely provider is a major turnoff ? My feeling about this is that providers who overdo this "artform" on their bodies ( along with body piercing ), look like "trailer trash bikers" & I won't frequent providers who look that way. Simply looks classless.
I will see a provider with ONE small tatoo discreetly placed, but, my preference is for providers without tatoos.
... is incite an arguement. You knew that when you posted it. I just don't get it. *sigh*
I don't have tattoos. I don't like tattoos. Does that make be better? Of course it does not. That is just simply my preference. That is what makes this hobby so wonderful. We all have our own preferences, and you as gentlemen get to choose "your" preference from amongst some of the greatest providers here in Vegas and in this country.
"Thoughts from the board about this?" How can you ask for thoughts about this, when you say "trailer trash bikers" ... You know exactly what thoughts will be shared. And it will get nothing but ugly ...
I wouldn't say that they look like "trailer trash bikers" cause that isn't very nice. Im not into the whole body being full of tats. A few is alright with me. Like Bombshell Mcgee is fucking gross and I wonder what Jesse James saw in her?
I hate body piercings! Im just not into it at all. But im not going to judge someone because they have a bunch of body piercings or tats. I just wont see them.
I like the piercing where my cock pierces the opening between her legs. Tattoos are OK in small doses. If I'm looking for art, I'll go to the art gallery. I have a different vision of beauty when I'm shopping for pussy.
Just like a 4 door vs a sedan, sushi vs steak, we all have our own preferences. With the options available in Las Vegas, you should be able to find what you are looking for. I also couldn't agree with Lorsha enough. Just asking for an argument.
Its like they say about opinions and as**oles, everybody's got one. This may be yours, but so what? To each his own. I have seen some with and some without. Actually one of my ATF's has quits a few.
Your post is rude to those that have either or, and makes you look like an asshole. Trailer trash bikers? You have something against motorcycles too? You look good wearing your alias. Btw- no one gives a shit about your preference on this board. Take it to the right venue and ask the guys. In my opinion, you just insulted quite a few ladies and that's all you did with your post. I think you are a pretentious pussy from the sounds of it...
You done tested the ire of the exquisite Ashley Jade. Sounds like you had two scoops of stupid ass shit for breakfast when you wrote this thread!
I'll tell you what. If by chance Ash would see you're dumbass, I GUARANTEE the last thing you would be thinking about is her tat which is prominently exposed on her pic.
Shit, you'd probably jizz in your pants when you see her walk in the room, she's THAT HOT!
I was just stating my preferences for providers with limited or no tats, because I think these lovely ladies look better without the overuse of such "body art". Of course, they have the right to display tats or not, as I have the right to see them or not.
Ash took the OP too personally; wasn't a knock against her. Hell------I didn't even know about her until after the OP was posted.
Lastly, I've seen many hot providers with limited or no tats, so I don't have to read any reviews, but, thanks for your help anyway,dude---
Everybody is entitled to there opinion on this subject. I have tattoo's and I have yet to be compaired to a trailer trash biker chick. A lot of people see tattoo's as offensive, some see them as an expression of themselves and others just dont care. The tattoos I have are simply a creative expression and reflection of who I am. Not to mention a great conversation starter "Hi, I love the ink, is there any special meaning to it.." Besides, people say that your body is your temple, so what? We're just decorating our walls. But to not respect people with tattoos? Thats like saying I don't respect people with pierced ears. To each is own. Best Wishes!
Speaking as a hobbiest, as far as tattoos go, it is a matter of personal preference. I know a number of ladies that have them and a like number that do not. Some of the ones that do have them, have them for a reason such as covering injuries from accidents and the like. They have tattoos instead of scars from major accidents or what ever. They are all tasteful, and as stated are a personal decision. If you don't like tattoos, then don't see a lady that has them. You have that choice for yourself, don't make blanket statements that reveal your own prejudices.
talk about a blanket statement. I'd think some would dispute you on that assertion.
I'm just candidly stating an opinion, that overuse of tats & body piercings mar the bodies of some lovely ladies that would look much better without them. If folks want to dispute that opinion, fine, but, I'm sure that quite a number agree with me & quite a few disagree.
We can all agree to disagree on this board, Sarge, which are the "choices we make for ourselves" here.
I never said that they were all tasteful. I said that they were a matter of personal preference. Some ladies really like a number of them, while others have a preference for tiny ones or none. Same goes for clients, it is a matter of personal choice. ie, some people like blondes, some brunettes, others redheads. Some like natural grooming, some landing strips, and others shaven. You are free to choose which you want to be with, so don't make statements that anything is overuse, it is their choice, you have to same choice to do business with them or not. So your original blanket statement is flawed.
If you would care or feel understanding for those who do not have them for a statement. Other than what this might make. Then I would like to speak up for myself.
July 19, 2006 I was in a terrible car accident after leaving a 10,000.00 photo shoot in Santa Monica.
My tire blew out and on the Interstate making my car flip 5 times, I was wearing a seatbelt which was expertly investigated. While the force made the seatbelt come loose, I was thrown out the windshield and flew and hit the ruff turf and laid there until the helicopters came to save my life at around 11:40am on a super HOT summers day.
As of this I was blessed to live and find myself in the need of covering up the 3rd degree burns my back suffered from... it has appeared that 103 dates later, I haven't had any hobbyist have any problems that I have read. Though maybe I am needing to be informed. I dunno maybe I'm clueless!! Keep the apathy INTERESTED?
We need somebody who's got the heart, the empathy, to recognize what it's like to be a young POWERLESS provider/human-being, the empathy to understand what it's like to be poor or less than your without or disabled and that's the criterion by which I'll be selecting my judges.
Having played many roles of scientific intellect I do have an empathy for that world. It's been hard on me because flying the Enterprise for seven years in Star Trek and sitting in Cerebro in X-men has led people to believe that I know what I'm talking about. But I'm still trying to work out how to operate the air conditioning unit on my car.
Visuals are what catches the eye, but I am more interested in what is inside. Unfortunately, the wrapper on the outside does not give much of a glimpse of what is within. I do not buy a Snicker's for the wrapper. However, I do admit I probably would never open it if it were wrapped in newspaper. A tattoo would not have any more significance than being a blonde or brunette.
Boards, reviews, PM's, and emails give clues to the wit, humor, and persona of the person. The visual may get my attention, but it is the what's inside that turns my crank.
Anyone share my sentiments that overuse of tatoos on an otherwise lovely provider is a major turnoff ? My feeling about this is that providers who overdo this "artform" on their bodies ( along with body piercing ), look like "trailer trash bikers" & I won't frequent providers who look that way. Simply looks classless.
I will see a provider with ONE small tatoo discreetly placed, but, my preference is for providers without tatoos.
Thoughts from the board about this ?
They are called tramp stamps for a reason. If I wanted to see Popeye, I would hang around the navy base in Jax. If a provider is all inked up I wont see her. Nor will I see one with implants. There are several providers who I will no longer see due to their addition of tats, impalnts or both.
And yes, too much ink makes one look like trailer trash.
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man."
Actually, B3, above quote NOT my sentiments in re to heavily tatooed providers; I was just being honest about my preferences in that regard & I don't want all hobbyists to think as I do, though several agreed with me on this thread.
Lastly, check historical link below about an ancient group of tatooed Celtic barbarians :
No longer are tattoos the sign of a sailor or trailer trash. Most women you find providing or in your local strip club will have a tattoo of some sort. It is much more rare these days to meet someone aged 18-35 who is ink free. Taking that into consideration, and the fact that you are indulging in this hobby, you must learn to embrace the young ladies generational differences that you are going to visit with.
You will find most ladies will not discriminate against a hobbyist because he has tatts, a beer belly, scars, tagged skin, or any other physical deformity. We are kind to one and all and overlook the physical in order to find a connection that goes beyond the superficial bullshit.
Clearly you are a person who does not like to delve beyond a person's skin and see the person inside. To me, that is sad. I'm sure you miss lots of opportunities to connect with great people in all areas of your life because of this.
However, a really nifty thing about TER's search function is: A hobbyist has the ability to plug in whether or not they would like a provider with tattoos! Imagine that.
It's a shame that due to some art, you find yourself on a high horse with the super power ability to judge others and what type of individual they may be simply because they have made a choice to adorn their body with art and you have not.
My parents taught me at a young age not to judge a book by it's cover. Unfortunately for you, it seems you missed that lesson.
Many tattooed people have them for very personal reasons: to commemorate an important event, a tribute to a loved one who has passed, a clean and sober date...the list goes on!
While I understand your right and reasons for not wanting to see a lady who has tattoos, it is unkind and unfair for you to label someone in a derogatory manner.
It is very simple, elect not to see a lady who is tatted. If she airbrushes the tatts out of her photo, which some do, make it a point to ask that question in an email when you introduce yourself.
I have discreet, well-placed tattoos, and I make no apology for them. I love my ink, and most men I meet are interested in their meaning, even if they don't like them or would not get one themselves.
In life, it is very important to remember: KINDNESS MATTERS!
Although I used an alias, I am loud and proud when it comes to this subject.
I doubt people like it when they get an ingot of gold thrown at their heads, though.
Saying "I prefer ladies without tattoos" doesn't need to involve derogatory terms for those that have them. And that was Shaw's point- Caesar says that line I quoted in response to someone who's blustering and shocked by another culture's traditions, and Shaw was saying what people find offensive isn't really a law of nature- merely what one is socially programmed to find "abnormal".
I mean, really, did you expect people to react nicely about being called "trailer trash"?
that they looked like "Trailer Trash", no way that they WERE trailer trash, which was far from my original point. I just wanted to be candid about how many beautiful providers appearances are marred by overuse of abundant & large tats & I'm sure a fair amount of hobbyists feel the same way. But, I will grant you about this topic, that opinions on "body art & piercings" will vary based on the age & cultural background of the hobbyist, which is a perfect example of "relatavism".
This board should be home to spirited debate from time to time, which doesn't always involve people reacting "nicely".
I had a hunch that my OP would generate controversy, but I made it a point NOT to make PERSONAL attacks against any provider or hobbyist, but, that courtesy was not extended to me. No BFD though, because OP's that are deemed "controversial" alwyays tend to generate ad hominem rebuttals which I was expecting.
"Tattoos make ladies look like trailer trash. Why do they do that?"
"I prefer ladies without tattoos, because that look isn't attractive to me. Why do they do that?"
Do you not see the difference? One is a thinly veiled insult that uses loaded language to indicate your preference, and implies that your preference is a norm people should adhere to (ladies should not get tattoos, otherwise, it makes them look like trailer trash), one states a preference in neutral language and doesn't assume that your preference is a norm people should accept.
You're coming at this from a viewpoint that your preference is actually a norm, by using terms like "marred", "trailer trash" and "overuse". The point I am making is that I think is that your preference is simply that; a preference, the same way you might not like a particular dish like liver and onions. Thus the GB Shaw quote.
look at the models in tattoos magazines they are so beautiful...bottom line it's their bodies and they can do what they like with it. It is classless to look down on ppl for this and that..look at you you have to pay to get laid how classy is that??
it should be disclosed. Many times a provider will not show them in her pics and when i visited her I'm like WTF! I will always find out how many she sports before the appointment. I don't care about the one above the ass crack, but when she is sporting many, then I'm spending my $ on a clean canvas.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
