"Okays" or TER's "Whitelisting" in deciding on accepting a date with the hobbyist.

I find both resources very helpful.

This is the only place I post so it would have to be TER Whitelist for myself.

over a ter whitelist.Ter whitelist can be great in some cases.
And in a few occasions I have found whitelists to be very questionable.
I like P411 because you can see a gent's profile there as well as the okays and it gives you a little bit more info.

-- Modified on 11/12/2013 12:27:35 AM

hile both are nice to have as an additional screening , it doesn't really matter to me as I have my own way of screening .  
I have screened many gents that didn't have either.  
but I also screen gents with out requesting references .......
so I am probably not the norm LOL LOL LOL  

I can relate to what yo said, although in my case is different as I am in London x

I don't screen by references; meaning I don't require them, nor do I accept them in lieu of other info.  Okays/whitelists can be helpful, but they are never the only thing I use to verify potential clients.  I'm easily able to screen without Okays or whitelists, as well.  My way is quick, simple & works well for me

dr. spice is certainly not the norm!!!

I've only seen one (1) gal who was NOT listed on P411 over the past couple years!  I've only once had a "hesitance" issue with a gal not immediately approving me simply based upon my P411 "okays".   I've also been told by many that P411 "okeys
 have more cred than TER Whitelists.  I think the issue is similar to the fact it's so easy, and unfortunately frequent, for "bogus" reviews to get posted on TER!   But overall, the available online resources we have these days are a tremendous aid.  

I agree totally !

For her to white list you .

But I would have to agree with what was said below p411 is nice because it gives you more information about the gentleman you are going to be spending time with so I would have to say P411 !!!!!!

How is it done in europe?

I just wanted to ask for other opinions.