I have been researching the LV reviews and board, and I have noticed that a few of the "top tier" providers have reviews all over the score board, 2s to 10s. Is this a case of so many out of towners who come(no pun) to LV with really different expectations? Or, that they see so many calls that they can't always be on top form? I reside in Phoenix and it doesn't seem to be as erratic. The top tier ladies here don't vary that much, mostly 8,9 or 10.

They can all have a bad day, or YMMV, or things did not click.

Happens to every girl, every city, across the fruited plains. Look at the larger pictue and/or move on.

If one were to look are your reviews, it is readily apparent that you started doing reviews in January of this year. And in that time, to your credit you have chosen very well, as all the ladies have pages and pages of 8, 9 and 10's long before you came on the scene.

I suggest you do further studies here in this town, and am sure you will discover the same jackpots at the end of that rainbow. Good luck.

-- Modified on 8/3/2007 1:44:07 PM

I'm not looking to call attention to any lady's bad reviews, but I can't recall any of what I think of our "top tier" getting much in the line of bad reviews.

Wow, who peed in your wheaties today? Move on? Who the fk are you? I asked a simple question I thought.

i also don't know any "top tier" vegas providers with low scores.  who are you referring to?

read his second sentence. I think I have pissed off enough LV people here today without pointing out low reviews, thank you very much.

But, now you are about to mess up the whole bowl.

I thought I was giving you some sound advise. You can take that or leave it as you wish.

Do not expect a lot of assistance when you come in from elsewhere and take a shot at the local ladies for having skewed review numbers. Good luck with that one.

Maybe he read Nikki Avalon's reviews from 2001 that rated her performance a 3 and missed the other 28 pages  LMAO

or

LJ Montana's 5 performance in that same 2001, and missed the remaining 20 pages LOL

or

Brie Michael's 4 appearance and 5 performance back in 03 and missed the other 14 pages

Well I guess you can see the pattern.

Sorry to butt in, I'm not a regular on the Vegas board, just an interested reader from time to time and this seemed to deserve some humor.

A little humor can go a long way here some days.

personally if you ask me to define "top tier", I would say someone with at least 20 reviews and an avg of 9 and higher.

Like Boris78989 pointed out, they may have a rare low score review once in a while. But I would say they are more like the rare exceptions to the rule, than "all over the score board"

and here's a perfect example

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?ID=87358&pnotes=1

You are right - it does deserve humour. (What goes on in bedrooms often is very funny.)

I saw Brie Michael and while I didn;t give her a 4 appearance and 5 performance back in 03 my scores on my visit in 2005 were not as good as her other reports. As I wrote in my long review we just did not quite click - that happens sometimes in this hobby. Try someone else.