Las Vegas

Sorry...
maxxx69 1729 reads
posted
1 / 7

Fairly new player on CL, goes by "Amy". Reviews too good, while profile does not reflect the reality. Pics ARE TOTALLY fake. Baby fat is an understatement and a compliment, looks are barely 5 and performance about the same. Nice girl otherwise.

Smarty1101 61 Reviews 1781 reads
posted
2 / 7

but, just where are you getting all your information from that profile?

Three reviewers with many reviews each, does not normally mean fake right off the bat.

How do you know the pics "ARE TOTALLY fake"? Baby fat is always in the eye of the beholder I would think. "Looks are barley 5" based on that one picture? Surely you jest. "Performance about the same"? How did you get that? I do not see a review by you. But she is "nice girl otherwise".

I bet these gals appreciated your critical seasoned eye and spreading the negative word here and in your post below. I agree with BoneBoy, perhaps you need to get all your points accurate.

Give everybody a chance Maxx if they are terrible it will be found out soon enough.

balathazar 1 Reviews 1588 reads
posted
3 / 7

Have you seen Amy and are doing a mini review to contest the reviews already posted for her? Unless you have also seen her and are doing a mini review here then how would you know the pics don't match?

The 3 reviewers have 13/6/10 reviews along with Amy's. Seems pretty legit.

From the pic I saw, she has no fat at all, not even baby fat. And I would say she is WELL above a 5.

b-

boneboybob 34 Reviews 1796 reads
posted
4 / 7

Submit your 5/5 (if you've actually seen her, which apparently you have, since you have such intimate information concerning looks and services- or perhaps you know of this otherwise?) and be done with it, instead of trashing on the boards.

For one thing, a number of people WILL find that provider profile, but will never come to the Vegas TER Board or see your post, so you've done them no service by posting your information here. Staff does NOT read every post here, nor do they take the word of posters with no review history over multiple people with review history. If you want to correct the record, correct the record.

I will say that based on the reviews I read of this lady, I could see how a 5/5 review would be credible (there are some, uh, odd performance scores being handed out in those reviews, and some hints that the picture does not match the person- not so much fake reviews as people who don't quite get the scoring system).... but the fact that you aren't submitting one is telling.

FrankyBoy5150 2 Reviews 2044 reads
posted
5 / 7

If you have seen her where is your review of her? If you haven't seen her how do you know her looks are a 5? Everyone that has reviewed her rates her well. You sound like a hater or perhaps her competition?

maxxx69 1684 reads
posted
6 / 7

Look, guys, I'm sorry for not posting the review. Please, don't "but the fact that you aren't submitting one is telling". I'm really bad about those. Don't know what to say more than I already did that would be any more meaningful. Consider the original post "a mini review". I did see her, and to the person above doing all CAPS, pics are, therefore, TOTALLY FAKE. "Does not match a person" is a euphemism, an understatement. I'd prefer to call it "bait and switch". She is not the girl in the pictures. Period. Mediocre provider, would not see again.

I do not have a good explanation for the reviews in her profile, that's why I said "probably fake". Can't believe that someone who really saw her would rate her like that and say that the pics are real. Only if you're really, really drunk, or legally blind.

So, if anyone still has doubts, and would like to try this girl, feel free. Perhaps, after your encounter/session you'd give me a little more than (unreasonable) doubt.

privatei 1172 reads
posted
7 / 7

Maxxx69 I think you or one of your asian agencies has a problem with this girl and that is why you try to bring a negative tone around her otherwise positive reviews. You are not fooling anyone here!

Register Now!