But seriously, I think many people here have an image of LJ as a total wild woman, and while she can be, she also really enjoys a relaxing, evening, of movies, pizza, and, of course, popcorn LOL! Those are the kinds of dates we have together, and despite what TER rules say, she's always a 10 to me.

I gave LJ two 10's. Dont know what happened.

Some of the (select your own derogatory term) who approve reviews are confused as to the rules regarding performance scoring! You had a relatively "tame" session with LJ and you didn't say she performed any extraordinary services. If that were all she normally offered, she would only be eligible for a 7. That is why I think they reduced your rating. However, LJ is really eligible for a 10, because she does offer enough extraordinary services. The fact that your review didn't include any of them should NOT cause them to reduce your score for her performance! It should have been left at 10, since she is elegible for a 10. It was your choice not to take advantage of all of LJ's wldness, lol, but I'm sure it was all available to you. So your score should have stood at 10! But whoever approved your review obviously does not understand that! I had the same problem with my review of Nikki Avalon, but I kept sending TER letters, explaining the rules which are written for everyone to see, and they finally changed my performance score of her back to the 10 I had originally given her. It's funny, my review of LJ, which came later, was posted as a 10-10 and stood up, even though my session with LJ was much like yours, and that was reflected in my review. So it just depends on who approves the reviews, whether the scores are reduced or not. LJ seems to be happy with the 7, but it does reduce her average unfairly, so I would argue with TER a little if I were you.

T.L.