Las Vegas

The Top 27
winebuddy 16 Reviews 11854 reads
posted
1 / 26

I was just thinking how fortunate we who live in Las Vegas are.  The finest independent escorts in the country choose to live and work here.  So, I decided to do a little ranking of those escorts reviewed here on The Erotic Review.  Here is a list of the Top 27.  Shown are the girls names, average performance score (first number), and average appearance score (second number).  The averages are taken from the most recent 10 reviews.  (Obviously, there is a minimum of 10 reviews to qualify for this list.)  The ranking is based on the average performance review.  In case of a tie, the higher ot the two average appearance scores is listed first. All girls listed are independent, all are primarily escorts (i.e. no "porn stars").  Of course, scoring is subjective to the reviewer.  The girls vary in personality, physical features, services performed, and donation required.  And remember, these are averages, not my scores.  I have not seen all of these girls, at least not yet!

1.  Armani           9.6     8.9
2.  Jackie           9.5     9.0
3.  Tori             9.5     8.5
4.  LJ Montana       9.1     9.2
5.  Mary O'Malley    8.9     7.3
6.  Brie Micheals    8.8     8.3
7.  Alexia Jay       8.6     7.9
8.  Natasha          8.5     9.0
9.  Celtic Lass      8.5     7.5
10. Angelina Amour   8.4     8.5
11. Angella          8.4     8.2
12. Arianna          8.3     8.6
13. Logan            8.3     7.4
14. Roxy             8.2     8.2
15. January          7.9     8.4
16. Cindy Spice      7.9     8.1
17. Roxanne          7.7     8.0
18. Jackie Jewel     7.7     7.9
19. Steevie          7.7     7.5
20. Kit              7.7     7.5
21. Devin Taylor     7.6     7.8
22. Tia              7.3     8.8
23. Amy Jordan       7.2     7.4
24. Jade             7.1     8.0
25. Shannon          7.1     7.7
26. Diana            7.0     6.7
27. Nicole           6.8     5.6                          

 

-- Modified on 1/17/2003 11:20:57 AM

spinner39 35 Reviews 12380 reads
posted
2 / 26

interesting how my top ten would be entirely different than what's posted ... only goes to show that one man's ugly duckling is another man's swan ........ hobby well hobby safe hobby all you can be ......

-- Modified on 1/17/2003 11:49:08 AM

tba 20 Reviews 12050 reads
posted
3 / 26

I know Ashley (of Spokane) has to be in there...if not way up there!

cheesewiz 1 Reviews 12243 reads
posted
4 / 26

I hate using numbers to rate ladies. It's like filling out one of those "how are we doing" cards at Denny's.

Number 6 124 Reviews 14305 reads
posted
5 / 26

Actually, it's not a bad lineup, but there seems to be this badge of honour amoung Vegas girls that like the casinos, you give the client minimum service while extracting maximum dollars. You also missed my pal Rosy R. who services well, my pal Kimberly, who generally hangs out on TBD (possibly her only fault) and Sierra (even though she's very expensive). Give me the LA or SF lineups anytime, there is much more warmth and genuine heartfeltness among the ladies who work there. Here, it's all about the money, which I understand and have no complaint about, but you can't change the way it is where the market caters to tourists and not locals.

Another problem I have is due to the nature of the business I work in, it's hard to see these ladies professionally, since I run into them personally and socially quite a bit more than is comfortable for me. Vegas is becoming the biggest small town I've ever lived in.

winebuddy 16 Reviews 13379 reads
posted
6 / 26

I missed Rosy Rocket due to simple oversite.  However, I can save face.  On her web site she advertises herself as a "porn star."  And as I said, the list I posted excludes "porn stars."  Not that there's anything wrong with porn stars!

Kimberly I'm not familar with.  A search revealed no "Kimberly" under Las Vegas.  Sierra I'm familar with, at least I've seen her web site.  However, she has exactly zero reviews on TER.  But you're right, she is very expensive, at least according to the listed donation on her web site.

You say you run into the ladies personally and socially.  It will take me a while to decide whether I think that's good or bad.

BigPoppaPumplv 15646 reads
posted
7 / 26

I'm assuming by Kim you mean AKA WiggleWomen?   It would be pretty hard to have her in the Vegas list as she's been on the east coast for a bit.   Overall a good list and a good way to rate them.

CelticLass 13252 reads
posted
8 / 26

While I am incredibly flattered by making the Top 10 of this list, since after 3 years I still can't make a Top List on another Board...LOL....I do agree with Spinners assement and Cheesewizs statement that number rankings are like writing a courtesy card at a restraunt.

And while many will not agree with some list rankings because some reviews are seriously over embelished and in some cases written by the providers themselves...it is true that all reviews are subjective and will not truly reflect the time you will spend with each lady.

I have had gents tell me I am the most incredible woman they have ever seen or spent time with and then have had others look at me like a dog listening to a high pitched whistle. Its a matter of taste and preference. And no two men and there wants and desires are the same.

Thank you WB for giving my ego a boost for a minute..it was fun. But reviews should be taken as a chance to see if a lady is true to her site, her claims of companionship and if she is is going to afford you the opportunity to have the kind of experience you are looking for. Rankings really cant give you that.

just my humble .02

xoxox
Lass

Number 6 124 Reviews 14073 reads
posted
9 / 26

Let me put it this way: I have met several of them with the husband or s.o. and kids. Kind of hard to think of them as a sex object when you're meeting the family. It also raises a few more obvious questions which really need not be discussed at all, at least here.

Now, if you're clubbing and everything is cool, then I imagine it's not a problem. But it rarely goes down that way, and certainly not so smoothly. Professional women take great lengths to separate their personal and professional lives. It is very hard to be involved in both, it just doesn't work that way, and after three years of reading the ladies who post on TER, I thought that too would be obvious by now.

Number 6 124 Reviews 12475 reads
posted
10 / 26

miss ya!

I haven't spoken with Kim in a while, but it wasn't THAT long ago she was in town. Great lady, and I wish she'd spend more time here.

GracieLouFreeBush 14323 reads
posted
11 / 26

Kim has been gone from Las Vegas for at least 3 months. And she has never been quiet about her contempt for TER. I wouldn't count on her spending much time here. But then again she might now that her name has been mentioned.

-- Modified on 1/18/2003 10:18:49 AM

brownhound 5 Reviews 11081 reads
posted
12 / 26

And she's in DC tonight  :)  I'm sure glad she moved, I have to get my regular dose of wiggling in  :)  yooooohoooooooo!!!

-- Modified on 1/18/2003 1:37:54 PM

brownhound 5 Reviews 13190 reads
posted
13 / 26

that can fully describe this lifestyle, if we can call it that.  Some people prefer one site, some prefer another, whatever.  If you stick to just one I think you probably miss out on some good information.

Kimberly is on Erosguide.com under DC visitors right now.  She was very vocal and well known in the Las Vegas hobby community for awhile but has moved to the east coast and is now going by Kimberly of NJ.  There is lots of info about her on other sites.

Sierra has reviews on other sites too.  Lots of info on her on www.nvbrothels.com too, she used to work in las Vegas brothels.  I would have posted a review or two of her on here except that she requested that I not do so.  She just doesn't feel comfortable having the "juicy details" posted about her.  Whatever.  I don't really mind respecting a lady's desire for some privacy in that regard.

We're talking about individuals here, all with differing qualities, not manufactured widgets.  They don't all offer themselves to this market in the same manner.  So price is entirely subjective.  What you may characterize as "expensive" may be a great value to someone else.  And what may be a bargain to you may be entirely worthless to someone else.

Hollywood7 12 Reviews 13662 reads
posted
14 / 26

VEry interesting list and sure gets the opinions out!!!  So here is mine.  I have been fortunate to see 3 of the ladies on your list and respectfully disagree with the order(but what the hell).  Cindy Spice too low.  January too high.  I pesonally thought Amy Jordan blew January away.  But again just my opinion.YMMV!!!!  Have fun !!!!!  By the way I am seeing Kayla Kat this week.  any comments?

BigPoppaPumplv 11798 reads
posted
15 / 26

You made a statement that sums up the whole rating deal,  YMMV. I've seen 7 of the ladies on the list and my ATF is the lowest rated of all of the ladies I've seen.  We all have different likes  and dislikes.  To me the one thing that makes a date a 10 is how well you get along with the lady.  There have been a lot of great points made on this thread and it's provided an interseting topic.

Number 6 124 Reviews 10143 reads
posted
16 / 26

It is sort of a shame El Grande Pimperrito got off last week. I was looking so forward to TBD being renamed The Big Doghouse!

scorpiobill 2 Reviews 13296 reads
posted
17 / 26

I agree with BPP's statement.I've heard him and others say it's important to find someone you "click" with.My personal favorite is down towards the bottom of the list.IF I saw someone at the top,the "chemistry" might not be there.I don't know, has ANYONE here taken the time and money to see ALL of them?

brownhound 5 Reviews 16158 reads
posted
18 / 26

that's not a pleasant wish to give someone, and I would post that also in response to a similar but reverse post on the other board.

lewdog 14186 reads
posted
19 / 26

What do people think of Helen Bedd?  Worth the time and money?

Kimmie 13273 reads
posted
20 / 26

Whoever said I'd probably respond once I heard about this thread apparently knows me pretty well - shame I cant tell who they are from the alias to thank them 'properly' =)  In any case, they were also correct in saying this is definately not one of my favorite places. Simple fact being the graphic reviews here just turn my stomach. My friends LJ and Roxy have tried for over a year to convince me that I needed to be over here but I just couldn't bring myself to do it. To my buds, Number 6 and Spinner, please accept my apologies for not contacting you before leaving that god foresaken city more than three months ago. I have no excuse other than $hit happens.  Life's been a real bitch living 300 feet from the beach!! My new site is listed below that has new contact information should you get the urge to say hi!  I'd love to hear from you!

As far as the gentleman searching for my reviews - do a search on the "other board" using city name vegas - escort name "kim" -if you go back as far as 2000 there should be some very interesting reading material =)  

ps...Number 6 I will be back in Vegas in about three weeks to tie up some loose ends. I believe you owe me dinner *wink =)

-- Modified on 1/20/2003 3:32:49 PM

-- Modified on 1/20/2003 3:34:56 PM

Number 6 124 Reviews 13589 reads
posted
21 / 26

One of us should find the other, no? I am RFB at one of El Donaldo's better know establishments. Better he pays than moi.





Cheese Chronicles 11334 reads
posted
22 / 26

I found too many flaws on how this list was compiled:

1) You don't account for those who have recently moved into the area and have been well reviewed - Brooke Butler, Desiree Yum Yum, Sweet Sable are a couple of examples.

2) There is no accounting for no shows - most are not listed in the review section. Do a search on the boards and you will see at least one (Alexia Jay) that is highly rated but has several no show/no calls posted on the message board. And I do personally know at least 2 guys she no-show/no-call.

3) Not everyone has the same criteria for judging. My definition of "model material" might be different than yours. Same goes for service level. Most don't use the guidelines setup by TER:

http://theeroticreview.com/MsgBoard/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=36409&boardID=12&page=1

4) Questionable reviews - I means the ones with 10 for looks and 10 for service by gentleman who have no posting history or other reviews. I don't consider these reviews actuate. They can be embellished/hyped, written to impress the provider and meaningless to the hobbyist, and/or possibly written by the provider herself. Unless I personally know the guy or has several reviews, I don't count them as truly accurate.

5) Bad reviews - Sometimes written to ruin the reputation of the provider, other times the person didn't "click".

6) Number of reviews - While the 10 most recent reviews is a good number. However what about the time frame in which those reviews were written???? Natasha has 16 pages of reviews and she has been here since Sept 2001, others such as Lisa Storm who have zero reviews (by her choice), you have others who are not as active - such as Daisy Lynn, and those new the Internet - such as Tori Anne, Alexis, Paris Layne, Elyse(sp) Taylor, and Sierra (recently unretired). BTW, anyone else curious how Natasha got so many reviews in so little time???


7) What about people like myself - I hate writing reviews and most of the ones I have done are posted on the boards. I'm not comfortable writing reviews into a database.

I'm not trying to discredit you Winebuddy. I think that there should be more factors besides looks and service and not based on inconsistent standards by differnet reviewers to have a ranking system.



-- Modified on 1/21/2003 2:30:51 AM

-- Modified on 1/21/2003 2:44:51 AM

Cheese Chronicles 12150 reads
posted
23 / 26

I have never seen her.

-- Modified on 1/21/2003 2:11:28 AM

povero bianco rifiuti 13197 reads
posted
24 / 26



-- Modified on 1/21/2003 5:01:18 AM

roulotte parco lunatico 11931 reads
posted
25 / 26



-- Modified on 1/21/2003 6:00:21 AM

Kimmie 13333 reads
posted
26 / 26

I'll be in the EWR area tomorrow early afternoon - then heading to A/C both thursday and friday - shall I look for the man wearing a roulette layout sports coat?  LOL

-- Modified on 1/21/2003 11:02:14 PM

Register Now!