A few days ago, I saw Eve from Las Vegas Peaches. What a great gal (with great curves)! Buddah proves that agencies can be honest and give great service.Ventana, a satisfied client.

Ventana is a regular and reputable poster on both this board and another Vegas Hobbying Board.  While I have not had a session with any of Buddah's providers, Ventana's review carries alot of weight as to accuracy.  Are there any other reviews of Peaches?  Perhaps not all agencies are the same.-Vegas Moderator

Hmm... perhaps all agencys are not the same, but, and I am not usually one for such strong oppinions in matters that don't concern me, Why, Why, WHY does a man need to pay 450 dollars going in part to pi - man to get a great girl with great service when the independants even in Las Vegas don't make that much an hour??? I don't understand this at all... Why do you need to financially support, in this case, buddah, to see Eve???Baffled,

What's your problem here?  Some guys like to see ladies once, maybe twice.  With an independent, that's a big risk, since each could easily turn out to be a bad experiences.  _GOOD_ Agencies provide a way for guys who are looking for variety to also get some level of quality control without investing large amounts of time in doing research.  On the flip side, some ladies like to have someone arrange their appointments and generally run the business side of things.  This is especially useful to women that only work part time or are just starting and couldn't afford to advertise by themselves.But, some how, I think you already knew that.  I certainly see why you would want to discourage dilution in your market place, but your post seems a bit lame even so.  Buddah seems like a pretty good guy to me, and he doesn't deserve to have you shitting on him like this.  If you don't like the business model, fine don't use it, but don't try to tear down those that do.Falcon

Both Kristina and Falcon raise several good contentions.  Kristina, who is a very reputable independent provider, objects to the business model of an agency as a "pimp" type relationship.  This is not to say that Buddah is a pimp, and I use this term with reluctance. Falcon believes that there is such a thing as a "good agency".  In my experience, and this is not to say that all agencies are like this, but all of them have little quality control and are one step away from being a ripoff. In Vegas, I have used about 5 different agencies, and they all operated in a similar fashion. In fairness, Buddah attempts to guarantee that you will not be ripped off and has no problem answering your questions.  However, I do side with Kristina in that I am still skeptical of agencies and people who "manage" providers.  Time will be the true test, as we get more reviews on Las Vegas Peaches and other agencies.  Only then, will we have a big enough sample to make an educated decision.  In closing, I thank both Kristina and Falcon for their editorial posts, as this Board is all about the free exchange of ideas.-Vegas Moderator

'Both Kristina and Falcon raise several good contentions. Kristina, who is a very reputable independent provider, objects to the business model of an agency as a "pimp" type relationship. This is not to say that Buddah is a pimp, and I use this term with reluctance.'Hmm, reluctant to say it, but more than happy to imply it?I don't get this need to crucify this guy.  Best I can tell, no one that's ever done buisness with him has a problem with him.  Its only those that haven't that do.  (I should admit here that my only interactions with him have been a few posts on message boards and an email or two.)  Yes, most agencies are ripoffs.  Yes, most agentcies are just as much out to ripoff both the customer and the escort.  Does this mean that some good ones _CAN'T_ exist?  Maybe I'm more open to the idea because I have seen a existance proof of a good one.  Of course, since the owner did things like pay her taxes and help her ladies get off drugs, she was a blight on the community and needed to be sent to jail.  God knows we better not let a person like that get away with it!Falcon

First of all, I didn't bring up the "pimp issue", Kristina raised it as a point.  That would be like me saying that you imply that all agencies are good, which would be a butchering of what you contended.  You really need to read more closely before you go on the attack.  Secondly, my objections are again based on personal experience with agencies.  Did I ever mention that there are no good ones?  That would be an unfair generalization.  In fact, I indicated as we get more reviews a more educated opinion can be formulated.  Once again, you need to read more closely before attacking.  Like yourself, the only experience I have with Peaches of Las Vegas are phone calls and e-mails.  Until there are more reviews, like the reviews of independent providers, we will not know if Peaches of Las Vegas is straight up. Geez, now you even got me worked up, I think we all need to take a chill pill.-Vegas Moderator

Having resided in major cities in the U.S., Asia and Europe the past 30 years, I have dealt many reputable agencies who provided excellent service at reasonable prices.     Seattle and our nation's capitol have highly espected agencies and excellent courtesans, including convenient and well-appointed in-call locations.     The nature of this business in Vegas is different for many reasons, the most obvious one being that the bulk of clients is based on visitors.  This and the general free-wheeling, carnival nature of "sin city" make it the most fertile ground for agencies predicated on the rip-off business model.     Good agencies are not pimps - they are the support staff to facilitate an efficient and profitable business model.  The rates at Peaches and many other agencies are in fact more reasonable than the independents.     I am glad to see an agency such as Peaches garner praise and hope it portends more of the same in the future.

OK, Firstof all. You said:    "What's your problem here? Some guys like to see ladies once, maybe twice. With an independent, that's a big risk, since each could easily turn out to be a bad experiences. _GOOD_ Agencies provide a way for guys who are looking for variety to also get some level of quality control without investing large amounts of time in doing research"     You SORT OF have a point but because providers are human beings as are our clients YM will always V because of something called chemistry. So unless the agency owner F**cked you his or her self, and knows just how you like it, and just how their girls like it, how are you to say that that won't be a disaster. OF COURSE the same applies for independants. I feel your chances are better being able to look at a site such as this one to find out everything down to how she shaves, if that happens to be an issue. But whatever. I certainly wouldn't even suggest as to how you should spend your money. It's yours.     As for"But, some how, I think you already knew that. I certainly see why you would want to discourage dilution in your market place, but your post seems a bit lame even so. Buddah seems like a pretty good guy to me, and he doesn't deserve to have you shitting on him like this. If you don't like the business model, fine don't use it, but don't try to tear down those that do."     That part of your post, I don't think #1 that my market place is in any fear of dilution because of any agency or other factor. #2 I certainly didn't and don't intend for my post to "tear down" anybody, "change anybody's oppinion", " take away from anybodys business" or other such implied agendas. I have worked for agency's, I don't like them, I feel if you don't have a p*ssy, stay out of the business... All I did is the same thing every other person who repies to a post on this board did. I read a post, I had an oppinion, I posted it.     Eve and Buddah if you read this I wish you luck in your endeavors and am ( maybe too obviouse to state? In that case, for falcons benefit) in no way trying to cut you down with my OPPINION, and to everyone else who reads this, I apologize for a not a very "lady like" post... BTW, what's up with your other post to the moderator? If you have a problem with my post then you do, but IMHO your responses seem a little irrational, or maybe overexaughsted, or to use you wording... lame.

No, you just called him a "pimp" (or no, you couldn't even bring your delicate self to say it, so you said "pi - man"), I'm sure that was meant in the best possible way.Falcon

Delicate, huh?...*From Merrian Websters colligiate dictionary...     Main Entry: 1pimpPronunciation: 'pimpFunction: nounEtymology: origin unknownDate: 1600: a man who solicits clients for a prostitute *from the American Heritage dictionarySYLLABICATION: pimp PRONUNCIATION:   pmp     NOUN : One who finds customers for a prostitute; a procurer.      INTRANSITIVE VERB : Inflected forms: pimped, pimp·ing, pimpsTo serve as a procurer of prostitutes.      ETYMOLOGY: Origin unknown * from Websters 1913 unabridged...Pimp (Page: 1087)Pimp (?), n. [Cf. F. pimpant smart, sparkish; perh. akin to piper to pipe, formerly also, to excel. Cf. Pipe.] One who provides gratification for the lust of others; a procurer; a pander. Swift. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------Pimp (Page: 1087)Pimp, v. i. [imp. & p. p. Pimped (?); p. pr. & vb. n. Pimping.] To procure women for the gratification of others' lusts; to pander. Dryden. pimp pimp pimp pimp... Which one of these definitions doesn't fit? There, of course, are more, but I thought I would leave some room on this board for people who actually have important issues to discuss...Related link: kristina--modified by kristina at Sun, Apr 29, 2001, 14:43:11

Sundays are always tough on me, being that this is my recovery time for my late night and after hours dance clubbing...... You gotta love techno music.  Hmmmm, what was my train of thought..... oh yes, it has come back to me now.  What I am trying to say is that it is clear here that we have a differering of opinions.  One side objects that most agencies are inherently bad, and the other believes not all agencies are bad.  Both sides have very valid points in this controversial issue.  I believe that most people have some sort of opinion as to agencies.  It has always been an ongoing debate as to whether what is better an agency or an independent.  My thoughts on the matter is that there is still little information out as to Peaches of Las Vegas.  Once more reviews materialize, I am sure that we can all make an educated decision as to what we think.  For myself, it is no secret that I am very anti-agency.  This, however, is not to say that I believe all agencies are maligned.  For myself, I try to judge them more on a case by case basis. In fairness, I have had no provider dealings with Buddah, and I have also heard no complaints from any hobbyists.  But in short, who is correct in this debate?  The answer is that both sides raise valid issues, and leave the reader with information to decide on their own.  This is the whole concept of a free exchange of information.   Thank you to all who have participated in this thread.  Thank you especially to both Falcon for his arguments in support of some agencies, and Krisina's arguments against some agencies. On a side note, how many dictionaries do you own Kristina?.... LMAO.  -Vegas Moderator--modified by Vegas Moderator at Sun, Apr 29, 2001, 17:46:32--modified by Vegas Moderator at Sun, Apr 29, 2001, 17:47:14

I refer to you as a "whore"?  After all the Merriam-Webster OnLine Dictionary defines it as:Main Entry: whore      Pronunciation: 'hOr, 'hor, 'hur      Function: noun      Etymology: Middle English hore, from Old English hOre; akin to Old      Norse hOra whore, hOrr adulterer, Latin carus dear -- more at CHARITY      Date: before 12th century      1 : a woman who engages in sexual acts for money: PROSTITUTE; also : a promiscuous or immoral woman      2 : a male who engages in sexual acts for money      3 : a venal or unscrupulous personOk, I'm done, if you haven't gotten my point now, you never will.Falcon

Your post remains, as I do not like to curtail free speech. You have a point, but your DIRECT personal attacks have no place in this forum.  Personal attacks are the true sign of an absence of intellect, you could of responded to Kristina's post with logical arguments, but instead went the unsophisticated route of personal name calling.  Either grow up, or make sure to take your medication.  See now........ you got me into your bad habit of name calling.  Geez..... I'm gonna put a warm towel on my head..... seems I got a headache now.  There is no room for NAME CALLING on this board, any intelligent posts to this thread are welcome.-Vegas Moderator   --modified by Vegas Moderator at Sun, Apr 29, 2001, 19:34:16--modified by Vegas Moderator at Sun, Apr 29, 2001, 19:36:00

Well, maybe I haven't gotten your point because it is still sitting nicely on the top of your head. No, I do not mind if you call me a : whore, prostitute, 'ho, working girl, provider,ect, ect, ect... like my mother says, a cow is a cow no matter how you dress it. And I am what I am

lol

I've been gone for a couple of days and just ran across this thread.  You did a fine job moderating something that could have gotten out of hand rather quickly.  You did very little or no censoring and stuck to the policy of "no name-calling".Keep up the good work.  I love posting here and on the LA board.  GND does a fine job also.