My main concern with bareback is that i don't want there to be any chance of seamen getting inside me. Since nothing is shooting out of your fingertips then I don't worry too much about that.
With that being said, I love the fact that you use finger cots. I also am a stickler about clean hands. I am sure i have killed a few moods myself by stopping the makeout session to ask him to go wash his hands. FYI I go into the bathroom when I arrive and check to make sure that the soap has actually been opened and used. Unbelievable how many times the shower and sinks have not been used at all. I'll say, "Did the maid just leave?" And they say "no, she came earlier when I was out." OK, so that guys hands are not going anywhere near me.
So, if your hands are clean and soft, ie your cuticles are not a wreck, then I don't mind being touched everywhere. I actually like it. But, the customer is always right. And if you tell me you don't want to do it then we skip that part altogether. Communication is the key.
Posted By: Ishootcraps
OK, every so often I book a date, we're having a great time, i'm in the middle of the warm up phase, right before starting the big event, i got a mouthful of fun i'm working with when all of a sudden she begs, "please put some fingers in", and I'm like, "errrr, I don't like to do that", and the mood is killed.
Now as I've been doing this for a few years now, i've worked that "issue" into my "5 minute introductory talk" about boundaries and preferences. Now my little "pig sack" of accessories contains "COTS" (see photo below). Still I want to know, "Why is FIV not considered bareback sex"?
As I understand it, one of the reasons why bareback sex is so risky is because intercourse causes "micro-fractures" in the penis that the HIV virus can travel through from the bloodstream. Now I have several tears in my cuticles that compared to a micro fracture are "grand canyons" of openings in the skin. Some of them have minor bleeding. It seems to me that that is more risky than inserting my penis. In my opinion, just because it is not a penis, inserting any body part with out a cover should be considered bareback sex.
And on top of that, how about hang nails, those little pointy things that stick out the side of the cuciles and un manicured finer nails? Don't they scratch the inside? And aren't hands the dirtiest body part of the body?
Please help me understand this apparent contradiction; well, apparent at least to me.